Evaluating the "threat" effects of grade repetition. Exploiting the 2001 reform by the French-speaking Community of Belgium
In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5
Like active labour market programmes (ALPMs), grade repetition could generate two types of effects. Better/worse outcomes due to programme participation (i.e. the fact that pupils repeat a particular grade). This is what the existing literature on grade repetition has focused on. Another potential outcome is the ‘threat’ effect of grade repetition. Pupils and/or their family could make significant efforts to avoid grade repetition and its important opportunity cost. Learning effort by pupils could be a function of the risk of grade repetition. This paper attempts to assess that relationship by exploiting a reform introduced in 2001 in the French-Speaking Community of Belgium. That year, policymakers reinstated the possibility to repeat grade 7, putting an end to the regime of “social promotion” that existed before. We use data from two waves of the PISA study (corresponding to periods before and after the reform) to evaluate the medium-term effects of the reform. The first measure of performance we consider is the position in the curriculum (or grade) reached at the age of 15, and we show that it deteriorated after 2001. We also consider the reform’s impact on test scores. Focusing on grade 10, we fail to verify the necessary condition for grade repetition threat to lead to higher test scores. The tentative conclusion is that an enhanced threat of grade retention after 2001 did not lead to better outcomes, even among the segments of the population the most at risk of grade repetition.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by Asociación de Economía de la Educación in its series Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 5 with number
05-09.||Handle:|| RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-09||Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.economicsofeducation.com|
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael Rosholm & Michael Svarer, 2004.
"Estimating the Threat Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes,"
CAM Working Papers
2004-14, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics.
- Michael Rosholm & Michael Svarer, 2004. "Estimating the Threat Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes," Economics Working Papers 2004-6, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus.
- Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2004. "Estimating the Threat Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes," IZA Discussion Papers 1300, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Brian A. Jacob & Lars Lefgren, 2004.
"Remedial Education and Student Achievement: A Regression-Discontinuity Analysis,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics,
MIT Press, vol. 86(1), pages 226-244, February.
- Brian A. Jacob & Lars Lefgren, 2002. "Remedial Education and Student Achievement: A Regression-Discontinuity Analysis," NBER Working Papers 8918, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bart, COCKX & Muriel, DEJEMEPPE, 2007.
"IIs the Notification of Monitoring a Threat to the Unemployed ? A Regression Discontinuity Approach,"
Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques)
2007016, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
- Bart Cockx & Muriel Dejemeppe, 2007. "Is the Notification of Monitoring a Threat to the Unemployed? A Regression Discontinuity Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 2042, CESifo Group Munich.
- Cockx, Bart & Dejemeppe, Muriel, 2007. "Is the Notification of Monitoring a Threat to the Unemployed? A Regression Discontinuity Approach," IZA Discussion Papers 2854, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Geerdsen, Lars Pico & Holm, Anders, 2007. "Duration of UI periods and the perceived threat effect from labour market programmes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 639-652, June.
- Dan A. Black & Jeffrey A. Smith & Mark C. Berger & Brett J. Noel, 2003. "Is the Threat of Reemployment Services More Effective Than the Services Themselves? Evidence from Random Assignment in the UI System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1313-1327, September.
- Lars Pico Geerdsen, 2006. "Is there a Threat Effect of Labour Market Programmes? A Study of ALMP in the Danish UI System," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(513), pages 738-750, 07.
- Eide, Eric R. & Showalter, Mark H., 2001. "The effect of grade retention on educational and labor market outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 563-576, December.
- Michael Rosholm & Michael Svarer, 2008. "The Threat Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(2), pages 385-401, 06.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.