IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyzing the Anticipation of Treatments with Data on Notification Dates


  • Bruno Crepon


  • Marc Ferracci


  • Grégory Jolivet


  • Gerard Van Den Berg



When treatments may occur at di®erent points in time, most evaluation methodsassume - implicitly or explicitly - that all the information used by subjects about theoccurrence of a future treatment is available to the researcher. This is often called the\no anticipation" assumption. In reality, subjects may receive private signals aboutthe date when a treatment may start. We provide a methodological and empiricalanalysis of this issue in a setting where the outcome of interest as well as the moment ofinformation arrival (noti¯cation) and the start of the treatment can all be characterizedby duration variables. Building on the \Timing of Events" approach, we show thatthe causal e®ects of noti¯cation and of the treatment on the outcome are identi¯ed.We estimate the model on an administrative data set of unemployed workers in Francewhich provides the date when job seekers receive information from caseworkers abouttheir future treatment status. We ¯nd that noti¯cation has a signi¯cant and positivee®ect on unemployment duration. This result violates the standard \no anticipation"assumption and rules out a \threat e®ect" of training programs in France.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Crepon & Marc Ferracci & Grégory Jolivet & Gerard Van Den Berg, 2010. "Analyzing the Anticipation of Treatments with Data on Notification Dates," Working Papers 2010-41, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-41

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Caliendo, Marco & Künn, Steffen & Uhlendorff, Arne, 2012. "Marginal Employment, Unemployment Duration and Job Match Quality," IZA Discussion Papers 6499, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sri Srikandan). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.