IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pda611.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Brent James Davis

Personal Details

First Name:Brent
Middle Name:James
Last Name:Davis
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pda611
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Tarek Jaber-Lopez & Davis Brent J., 2022. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Post-Print hal-03744319, HAL.
  2. Tarek Jaber-Lopez & Alexandra Baier & Davis Brent J., 2020. "In-group, out-group effects in distributional preferences: the case of gender," Post-Print hal-02975903, HAL.
  3. Baier, Alexandra & Davis, Brent J. & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek & Seidl, Michael, 2018. "Gender, competition and the effect of feedback and task: An experiment," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 062, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
  4. Loukas Balafoutas & Matthias Sutter, 2017. "How uncertainty and ambiguity in tournaments affect gender differences in competitive behavior," Working Papers 2017-20, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
  5. Loukas Balafoutas & Brent J. Davis & Matthias Sutter, 2016. "Affirmative action or just discrimination? A study on the endogenous emergence of quotas," Working Papers 2016-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
  6. David Johnson & Brent Davis & Rob Oxoby, "undated". ""Shocks" and Productivity," Working Papers 2014-84, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 10 Nov 2014.

Articles

  1. Baier, Alexandra & Davis, Brent & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek, 2024. "Gender, choice of task, and the effect of feedback on competition: An experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  2. Brent J. Davis & Tarek Jaber‐Lopez, 2023. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 525-540, April.
  3. Jaber-Lopez Tarek & Baier Alexandra & Davis Brent J., 2021. "In-group, out-group effects in distributional preferences: the case of gender," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 199-214, May.
  4. Geoff Woolcott & Dan Chamberlain & Zachary Hawes & Michelle Drefs & Catherine D. Bruce & Brent Davis & Krista Francis & David Hallowell & Lynn McGarvey & Joan Moss & Joanne Mulligan & Yukari Okamoto &, 2020. "The central position of education in knowledge mobilization: insights from network analyses of spatial reasoning research across disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2323-2347, December.
  5. Brent J. Davis, 2018. "Does financial well-being affect portfolio construction? Evidence from an online survey," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 362-366.
  6. Davis, Brent J., 2017. "An experiment on behavior in social learning games with collective preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 93-95.
  7. Brent J. Davis & Rudolf Kerschbamer & Regine Oexl, 2017. "Is reciprocity really outcome-based? A second look at gift-exchange with random shocks," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 149-160, December.
  8. Brent DAVIS, 2016. "Economic Voting and the Clarity of Available Alternatives," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(8), pages 1973-1982.
  9. Brent J. Davis, 2016. "Dispersion of female business students across MBA program rankings," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2192-2202.
  10. Balafoutas, Loukas & Davis, Brent J. & Sutter, Matthias, 2016. "Affirmative action or just discrimination? A study on the endogenous emergence of quotas," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 87-98.
  11. Brent J Davis & David B Johnson, 2015. "Water Cooler Ostracism: Social Exclusion as a Punishment Mechanism," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 126-151, January.
  12. Yakup Doganay & Madina Ashirimbetova & Brent Davis, 2013. "Making Culture Happen in the English Language Classroom," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(10), pages 1-11, October.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Tarek Jaber-Lopez & Davis Brent J., 2022. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Post-Print hal-03744319, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Sorravich Kingsuwankul & Chloe Tergiman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2023. "Why do oaths work? Image concerns and credibility in promise keeping," Working Papers 2316, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.

  2. Baier, Alexandra & Davis, Brent J. & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek & Seidl, Michael, 2018. "Gender, competition and the effect of feedback and task: An experiment," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 062, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Cited by:

    1. Shastry, Gauri Kartini & Shurchkov, Olga & Xia, Lingjun Lotus, 2020. "Luck or skill: How women and men react to noisy feedback," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Claire Mollier & Aurora García-Gallego & Tarek Jaber-López & Sarah Zaccagni, 2024. "Gender of the Opponent and Reaction to Competition Outcomes," Working Papers 2024/08, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    3. Sandor Katona & Anna Lovasz, 2021. "The Role of the Gender Composition of Performance Feedback on Peers in Shaping Persistence and Performance," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2105, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Tarek Jaber-Lopez & Alexandra Baier & Davis Brent J., 2020. "In-group, out-group effects in distributional preferences: the case of gender," Post-Print hal-02975903, HAL.

  3. Loukas Balafoutas & Matthias Sutter, 2017. "How uncertainty and ambiguity in tournaments affect gender differences in competitive behavior," Working Papers 2017-20, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.

    Cited by:

    1. François Maublanc & Sébastien Rouillon, 2023. "Contests with an uncertain number of prizes with a fixed total value," Post-Print hal-03898633, HAL.
    2. Buser, Thomas & Ranehill, Eva & van Veldhuizen, Roel, 2017. "Gender Differences in Willingness to Compete: The Role of Public Observability," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 40, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Li, Jiangyan & Fairley, Kim & Fenneman, Achiel, 2024. "Does it matter how we produce ambiguity in experiments?," MPRA Paper 122336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Patricia Esteve‐González & Anwesha Mukherjee, 2023. "Heterogeneity, leveling the playing field, and affirmative action in contests," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 924-974, January.
    5. Loukas Balafoutas & Helena Fornwagner & Brit Grosskopf, 2021. "Predictably competitive? What faces can tell us about competitive behavior," Discussion Papers 2107, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    6. Chi Trieu, 2023. "Who’s who: how uncertainty about the favored group affects outcomes of affirmative action," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 252-292, December.
    7. Helena Fornwagner & Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2020. "Him or her? Choosing competition on behalf of someone else," Discussion Papers 2020-13, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    8. Gomez-Herrera, Estrella & Mueller-Langer, Frank, 2024. "Does information disclosure affect the gender gap in bidding behavior? Empirical evidence from a natural experiment on a large online labor platform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Sarah Necker & Fabian Paetzel, 2022. "The Effect of Losing and Winning on Cheating and Effort in Repeated Competitions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9744, CESifo.
    10. Helena Fornwagner & Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2023. "Choosing Competition on Behalf of Someone Else," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1555-1574, March.

  4. Loukas Balafoutas & Brent J. Davis & Matthias Sutter, 2016. "Affirmative action or just discrimination? A study on the endogenous emergence of quotas," Working Papers 2016-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.

    Cited by:

    1. Banerjee, Ritwik & Datta Gupta, Nabanita & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2016. "The Spillover Effects of Affirmative Action on Competitiveness and Unethical Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 10394, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Victoire Girard, 2021. "Stabbed in the back? Mandated political representation and murders," Post-Print hal-03557730, HAL.
    3. Astrid Kunze & Katrin Scharfenkamp, 2022. "Gender Diversity, Gender in the Boardroom and Gender Quotas," CESifo Working Paper Series 10077, CESifo.
    4. Victoire GIRARD, 2017. "Stabbed in the back: Does sabotage follow mandated political representation?," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2544, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    5. Catherine Eckel & Lata Gangadharan & Philip J. Grossman & Nina Xue, 2021. "The gender leadership gap: insights from experiments," Chapters, in: Ananish Chaudhuri (ed.), A Research Agenda for Experimental Economics, chapter 7, pages 137-162, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Felix Koelle, 2016. "Affirmative Action and Team Performance," Discussion Papers 2016-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    7. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Patricia Esteve‐González & Anwesha Mukherjee, 2023. "Heterogeneity, leveling the playing field, and affirmative action in contests," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 924-974, January.
    8. Chi Trieu, 2023. "Who’s who: how uncertainty about the favored group affects outcomes of affirmative action," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 252-292, December.
    9. Zenou, Yves & Islam, Asad & Pakrashi, Debayan & Sahoo, Soubhagya & Wang, Liang Choon, 2021. "Gender inequality and caste: Field experimental evidence from India," CEPR Discussion Papers 16736, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Marco A. Schwarz & Chi Trieu & Jana Willrodt & Marco Alexander Schwarz, 2022. "Perceived Fairness and Consequences of Affirmative Action Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 10198, CESifo.
    11. Francesco Fallucchi & Simone Quercia, 2016. "Affirmative action and retaliation in experimental contests," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-03, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    12. Julia Vasconcelos Furtado & António Carrizo Moreira & Ricardo José Rodrigues & Jorge Humberto Fernandes Mota, 2025. "Attitudes Toward Gender Parity Initiatives—A Comparative Study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6013-6038, August.
    13. Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah & Trieu, Chi & Willrodt, Jana, 2020. "Perceived fairness and consequences of affirmative action policies," DICE Discussion Papers 338, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Lina Marcela Ram√≠rez Leguizam√≥n, 2019. "The paradox of equality policies and meritocracy in female leadership," Documentos CEDE 17371, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    15. Eszter Czibor & Silvia Dominguez Martinez, 2019. "Never too Late: Gender Quotas in the Final Round of a Multistage Tournament," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 319-363.
    16. Ou, Kai & Pan, Xiaofei, 2021. "The effect of task choice and task assignment on the gender earnings gap: An experimental study," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Petters, Lea M. & Schröder, Marina, 2020. "Negative side effects of affirmative action: How quotas lead to distortions in performance evaluation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Getik, Demid & Islam, Marco & Samahita, Margaret, 2021. "The Inelastic Demand for Affirmative Action," Working Papers 2021:7, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    19. Kunze, Astrid & Scharfenkamp, Katrin, 2022. "Gender Diversity, Labour in the Boardroom and Gender Quotas," IZA Discussion Papers 15691, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Ji‐Hung Choi & Hannah Oh & John Bae & Sang‐Joon Kim, 2021. "Affirmative action and team performance: An agency theoretic perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1183-1193, July.
    21. Kunze, Astrid & Katrin Scharfenkamp, Katrin, 2022. "Gender diversity, labour in the boardroom and gender quotas," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 16/2022, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    22. Trieu, Chi, 2023. "Who's who: How uncertainty about the favored group effects outcomes of affirmative action," DICE Discussion Papers 405, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    23. Neschen, Albena & Hügelschäfer, Sabine, 2021. "Gender bias in performance evaluations: The impact of gender quotas," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    24. Bieberstein, Frauke von & Jaussi, Stefanie & Vogel, Claudia, 2020. "Challenge-seeking and the gender wage gap: A lab-in-the-field experiment with cleaning personnel," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 251-277.
    25. Getik, Demid & Islam, Marco & Samahita, Margaret, 2024. "The inelastic demand for affirmative action," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    26. Hanson, Andrew, 2017. "Do college admissions counselors discriminate? Evidence from a correspondence-based field experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 86-96.
    27. Kölle, Felix, 2017. "Affirmative action, cooperation, and the willingness to work in teams," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 50-62.
    28. Jeffrey A. Flory & Andreas Leibbrandt & Christina Rott & Olga Stoddard, 2018. "Increasing Workplace Diversity: Evidence from a Recruiting Experiment at a Fortune 500 Company," CESifo Working Paper Series 7025, CESifo.
    29. Rastad, Mahdi & Dobson, John, 2022. "Gender diversity on corporate boards: Evaluating the effectiveness of shareholder activism," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 446-461.
    30. Edwin Ip & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2018. "How Do Gender Quotas Affect Hierarchical Relationships? Complementary Evidence from a Respresentative Survey and Labor Market Experiments," CESifo Working Paper Series 6915, CESifo.
    31. Fernandes, Mario & Hilber, Simon & Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Walter, Andreas, 2023. "Closing the gender gap in academia? Evidence from an affirmative action program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).

Articles

  1. Baier, Alexandra & Davis, Brent & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek, 2024. "Gender, choice of task, and the effect of feedback on competition: An experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Claire Mollier & Aurora García-Gallego & Tarek Jaber-López & Sarah Zaccagni, 2024. "Gender of the Opponent and Reaction to Competition Outcomes," Working Papers 2024/08, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    2. Fu, Jingcheng & Zhong, Songfa, 2025. "Visceral influences and gender difference in competitiveness," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Barigozzi, Francesca & Domínguez, José J. & Montinari, Natalia, 2024. "Entering a gender-neutral workplace? College students’ expectations and the impact of information provision," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

  2. Brent J. Davis & Tarek Jaber‐Lopez, 2023. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 525-540, April. See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Davis, Brent J., 2017. "An experiment on behavior in social learning games with collective preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 93-95.

    Cited by:

    1. Diefeng Peng & Yulei Rao & Xianming Sun & Erte Xiao, 2019. "Optional Disclosure and Observational Learning," Monash Economics Working Papers 05-18, Monash University, Department of Economics.

  4. Brent J. Davis & Rudolf Kerschbamer & Regine Oexl, 2017. "Is reciprocity really outcome-based? A second look at gift-exchange with random shocks," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 149-160, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Fooken, Jonas, 2023. "Trusting when risk and ambiguity create opportunities for exploitation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Cason, Timothy N. & Friesen, Lana & Gangadharan, Lata, 2020. "Inter-firm social dilemmas with agency risk," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Andrea Guido & Alejandro Martinez-Marquina & Ryan Rholes, 2020. "Information Asymmetry and Beliefs Reveal Self Interest Not Fairness," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-53, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    4. Matthew Chao, 2018. "Intentions-Based Reciprocity to Monetary and Non-Monetary Gifts," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Rudolf Kerschbamer & Regine Oexl, 2023. "The effect of random shocks on reciprocal behavior in dynamic principal-agent settings," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 468-488, April.
    6. Serhiy Kandul & Bruno Lanz & Evert Reins, 2020. "Reciprocity and gift exchange in markets for credence goods," IRENE Working Papers 20-09, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.
    7. Bejarano, Hernán & Corgnet, Brice & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín, 2021. "Economic stability promotes gift-exchange in the workplace," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 374-398.
    8. Andrea Guido & Alejandro Martinez-Marquina & Ryan Rholes, 2022. "Reference Dependence and the Role of Information Frictions," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-17, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. Kujansuu, Essi & Schram, Arthur, 2021. "Shocking gift exchange," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 783-810.

  5. Balafoutas, Loukas & Davis, Brent J. & Sutter, Matthias, 2016. "Affirmative action or just discrimination? A study on the endogenous emergence of quotas," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 87-98.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Brent J Davis & David B Johnson, 2015. "Water Cooler Ostracism: Social Exclusion as a Punishment Mechanism," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 126-151, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Alice Solda & Marie Claire Villeval, 2017. "Exclusion and Reintegration in a Social Dilemma," Working Papers halshs-01579216, HAL.
    2. Alexandra Baier & Loukas Balafoutas & Tarek Jaber-Lopez, 2023. "Ostracism and theft in heterogeneous groups," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(1), pages 193-222, March.
    3. David Blake Johnson, 2016. "(Please Don't) Say It to My Face! The Interaction of Feedback and Distance: Experiments with Vulgar Language," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 336-368, May.
    4. Astrid Dannenberg & Corina Haita-Falah & Sonja Zitzelsberger, 2020. "Voting on the threat of exclusion in a public goods experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 84-109, March.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 3 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (3) 2016-05-21 2017-09-24 2017-09-24
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (1) 2017-09-24
  3. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2016-05-21
  4. NEP-GEN: Gender (1) 2017-09-24
  5. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2017-09-24
  6. NEP-LTV: Unemployment, Inequality and Poverty (1) 2017-09-24
  7. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2017-09-24

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Brent James Davis should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.