IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i4p6013-6038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes Toward Gender Parity Initiatives—A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Vasconcelos Furtado
  • António Carrizo Moreira
  • Ricardo José Rodrigues
  • Jorge Humberto Fernandes Mota

Abstract

The struggle for gender parity (sustainable development goal 5) sustains a controversial debate among authors, leaders, and organizations. Studies connecting social dominance orientation, status threat, and attitudes towards gender parity initiatives are scant. This article investigates these relationships and their mediators, focusing on gender parity initiatives in three independent studies—Brazil, Canada, and Portugal—comparing data collected from professors and employees in public and private HEIs. Both social dominance orientation (SDO) and status threat influence employees' attitudes towards gender parity initiatives, with SDO being the most important and significant determinant. Canadian employees are more supportive of gender affirmative actions and share a preference for group‐based inequality. Employees in all three countries perceive their societies as egalitarian, with a gender parity agenda in place, and no longer requiring efforts for gender equity regardless of the respondents' gender. Intriguing insights on the perceptions and attitudes of those self‐identifying as “woman” and “man” were found.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Vasconcelos Furtado & António Carrizo Moreira & Ricardo José Rodrigues & Jorge Humberto Fernandes Mota, 2025. "Attitudes Toward Gender Parity Initiatives—A Comparative Study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6013-6038, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6013-6038
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3438
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6013-6038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.