Author
Abstract
This study aims to examine the long-term efficiency pattern of Indian banks. To gauge efficiency scores, we employed a non-parametric DEA-based technique using metafrontier framework and estimated three efficiency measures, namely, overall technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency, for the period from 2000 to 2023. We have used two approaches viz. intermediation and operating approaches to estimate the efficiency. Further, we have evaluated the technology gap ratio (TGR) to assess the technology differences among the ownership groups. Moreover, in the second stage, dynamic panel data regression using Generalised methods of moment (GMM) is applied to link the variation in technical efficiency to various explanatory variables. The results obtained suggest that the performance of the Indian banks is inefficient under both approaches during the period of study. We found that foreign banks are the most efficient group under the intermediation approach, while the operating approach exhibits PSBs as the most efficient. The TGR values show that foreign banks (FBs) lead the Indian banking sector in production technology, indicating significant opportunities for both public and private sector banks to enhance their efficiency through the adoption of metatechnology. Further, we found that both the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and COVID-19 hurt the efficiency of Indian banks. The result shows that the decline in efficiency is more abrupt under the intermediation approach than the operating approach. The GMM results indicate persistence in efficiency performance, with profitability positively affecting and capitalization negatively impacting the bank's efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Sayed Mohammad Minhaj Uddin & Shakeb Akhtar & Furqan Qamar & Habiba Mughairi, 2025.
"Dynamics of technical efficiency in the Indian banking sector: a metafrontier DEA approach,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 2475-2510, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02058-1
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02058-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02058-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.