IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v16y2024i1p26-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Methods for Validating and Testing Entrepreneurial Ideas: A New Product Development Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zlatko BEZHOVSKI

    (Faculty of Economics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia)

  • Tamara JOVANOV APASIEVA

    (Faculty of Economics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia)

  • Riste TEMJANOVSKI

    (Faculty of Economics, Goce Delcev University, Stip, North Macedonia)

Abstract

In the new digital and dynamic world, the validation and testing of business ideas could be crucial for the entrepreneurial success. This paper explores the transformative role of online methods and tools within the framework of the 8 stage New Product Development (NPD), highlighting their role and indicating an iterative, customer-centric approach. Drawing on academic literature and contemporary online resources, the study classifies and analyzes various online methods, differentiating between validation (understanding market demand and customer needs) and testing (gauging customer responses to concrete concepts). Search interest tools, competitor analysis platforms, and customer feedback mechanisms enable early-stage validation. For concept testing, methods like crowdfunding, pre-sales, and simulated sales provide valuable feedback before product development begins. Finally, product testing utilizes prototypes, minimum viable products (MVPs), beta versions, and test marketing to refine the offering before broad market launch. While acknowledging challenges like potential biases and the digital divide, the study underscores the advantages of online tools in democratizing market research and enabling rapid idea validation. Looking ahead, the study calls for further research to explore the evolving landscape of online tools and methods for idea validation and testing, and their applicability across different industries and contexts. It also highlights the potential of AI and big data to enhance predictive analytics and further refine the business idea validation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Zlatko BEZHOVSKI & Tamara JOVANOV APASIEVA & Riste TEMJANOVSKI, 2024. "Online Methods for Validating and Testing Entrepreneurial Ideas: A New Product Development Perspective," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 26-45, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:26-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/v16i1/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Golden & John Joseph Horton, 2021. "The Effects of Search Advertising on Competitors: An Experiment Before a Merger," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 342-362, January.
    2. Jelassi, Tawfik & Leenen, Stefanie, 2003. "An E-Commerce Sales Model for Manufacturing Companies:: A Conceptual Framework and a European Example," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 38-47, February.
    3. Simeon Vosen & Torsten Schmidt, 2011. "Forecasting private consumption: survey‐based indicators vs. Google trends," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 565-578, September.
    4. Schaer, Oliver & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Fildes, Robert, 2019. "Demand forecasting with user-generated online information," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 197-212.
    5. Stevenson, Regan & Allen, Jared & Wang, Tang, 2022. "Failed but validated? The effect of market validation on persistence and performance after a crowdfunding failure," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2).
    6. Rembrand Koning & Sharique Hasan & Aaron Chatterji, 2022. "Experimentation and Start-up Performance: Evidence from A/B Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6434-6453, September.
    7. Junge, Louise Bech & Laursen, Iben Cleveland & Nielsen, Kristian Roed, 2022. "Choosing crowdfunding: Why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Siliverstovs, Boriss & Wochner, Daniel S., 2018. "Google Trends and reality: Do the proportions match?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Olivier Toubia & Laurent Florès, 2007. "Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 342-360, 05-06.
    10. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    11. David R. Keith & John D. Sterman & Jeroen Struben, 2017. "Supply constraints and waitlists in new product diffusion," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 33(3-4), pages 254-279, July.
    12. Chumnumpan, Pattarin & Shi, Xiaohui, 2019. "Understanding new products’ market performance using Google Trends," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bezhovski Zlatko, 2024. "“Business Concept Proofing 3.0” - A New Model for Validating and Testing Product Ideas in the Digital Environment," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 75-89.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caperna, Giulio & Colagrossi, Marco & Geraci, Andrea & Mazzarella, Gianluca, 2022. "A babel of web-searches: Googling unemployment during the pandemic," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Dimitrios Anastasiou & Konstantinos Drakos, 2021. "Nowcasting the Greek (semi‐) deposit run: Hidden uncertainty about the future currency in a Google search," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1133-1150, January.
    3. Takahashi, Carlos Kazunari & Figueiredo, Júlio César Bastos de & Scornavacca, Eusebio, 2024. "Investigating the diffusion of innovation: A comprehensive study of successive diffusion processes through analysis of search trends, patent records, and academic publications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Serhan Cevik, 2022. "Where should we go? Internet searches and tourist arrivals," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4048-4057, October.
    5. Schaer, Oliver & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Fildes, Robert, 2019. "Demand forecasting with user-generated online information," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 197-212.
    6. Anastasiou, Dimitrios & Bragoudakis, Zacharias & Giannoulakis, Stelios, 2021. "Perceived vs actual financial crisis and bank credit standards: Is there any indication of self-fulfilling prophecy?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Caperna, Giulio & Colagrossi, Marco & Geraci, Andrea & Mazzarella, Gianluca, 2020. "Googling Unemployment During the Pandemic: Inference and Nowcast Using Search Data," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2020-04, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    8. Paul Gift, 2020. "Moving the Needle in MMA: On the Marginal Revenue Product of UFC Fighters," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(2), pages 176-209, February.
    9. Martin Obschonka & Mingjie Zhou & Yixin Zhou & Jianxin Zhang & Rainer K. Silbereisen, 2019. "“Confucian” traits, entrepreneurial personality, and entrepreneurship in China: a regional analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 961-979, December.
    10. Brodeur, Abel & Clark, Andrew E. & Fleche, Sarah & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2021. "COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Yang, Xin & Pan, Bing & Evans, James A. & Lv, Benfu, 2015. "Forecasting Chinese tourist volume with search engine data," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 386-397.
    12. Sansone, Dario, 2019. "Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Jasmine D. Haynes & Khalilah Louis Caines, 2024. "Unveiling Curriculum Shadows of Systemic Adversity among Black Youth: Pathways to Eliminate Anti-Black Macroaggressions in Schools," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Jacques Bughin, 2015. "Google searches and twitter mood: nowcasting telecom sales performance," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 87-105, August.
    16. Fu, Chun & Miller, Clayton, 2022. "Using Google Trends as a proxy for occupant behavior to predict building energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    17. Robert Lehmann, 2021. "Forecasting exports across Europe: What are the superior survey indicators?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 2429-2453, May.
    18. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2024. "Toward an extended framework of exhaust data for predictive analytics: An empirical approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), June.
    19. Grechyna, Daryna, 2025. "Raising awareness of climate change: Nature, activists, politicians?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Vosen, Simeon & Schmidt, Torsten, 2012. "A monthly consumption indicator for Germany based on Internet search query data," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(7), pages 683-687.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:26-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.