IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Demand for Production Inputs as the Reflection of the Level of Property Rights Protection


  • Lyubimov, Ivan L.

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Kazakova, Maria V.

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)


In this paper, we discuss a mechanism linking the quality of institutions and the composition of demand for production inputs. We construct a simple theoretical model when a company can either produce a capital-intensive, or a labour-intensive good. In the former case, it uses physical and human capital as inputs while in the latter case, it employs human capital and labour to produce output. If property rights are wellprotected the company has higher incentives to start a capital-intensive production, as with a reliable enforcement of the property rights it can acquire a higher return from investing into physical capital. On the contrary, a less reliable protection of the property rights creates a potential threat to the firm as physical capital can be expropriated or arrested to urge the company to share its profits with rent-seekers. Thus, by not investing into physical capital, the company increases its bargaining power vis-a-vis the rentseekers. But in this case, it also needs less human capital, as the latter is in high demand when it complements physical capital. As a result, the insufficiently protected property rights reduce the demand for physical and human capital. And due to the fact that alongside the imperfectly protected property rights the company prefers to produce a labour-intensive product, it demands more labour. We illustrate this result with the case of Venezuela under the presidency of Hugo Chavez where an exogenous institutional shock resulted in sharp deterioration of business environment and led to withdrawal of capital from the country followed by exodus of entrepreneurs, scientists, physicians, journalists, etc. A lot of capital-intensive companies were shut down while the retail and wholesale sectors started playing a more prominent role.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyubimov, Ivan L. & Kazakova, Maria V., 2017. "The Demand for Production Inputs as the Reflection of the Level of Property Rights Protection," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 30-59, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1742

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Nathan Nunn, 2007. "Relationship-Specificity, Incomplete Contracts, and the Pattern of Trade," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 122(2), pages 569-600.
    2. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    3. Rajan, Raghuram G & Zingales, Luigi, 1998. "Financial Dependence and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(3), pages 559-586, June.
    4. Commission on Growth and Development, 2008. "The Growth Report : Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 6507, 05-2018.
    5. T. Natkhov & L. Polishchuk., 2012. "Engineers or Lawyers? Institutions and Demand for Higher Education," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 10.
    6. David H. Autor & Lawrence F. Katz & Melissa S. Kearney, 2006. "The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 189-194, May.
    7. Andrei A. Levchenko, 2007. "Institutional Quality and International Trade," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 791-819.
    8. David H. Autor, 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 3-30, Summer.
    9. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, Elsevier.
    10. V. Mau., 2016. "Anti-crisis measures or structural reforms: Russia’s economic policy in 2015," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
    11. Leamer, E.E., 1995. "The Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice," Princeton Studies in International Economics 77, International Economics Section, Departement of Economics Princeton University,.
    12. Ricardo Hausmann & Bailey Klinger & Rodrigo Wagner, 2008. "Doing Growth Diagnostics in Practice: A 'Mindbook'," CID Working Papers 177, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    13. Lyubimov, Ivan, 2016. "Corrupt bureaucrats, bad managers, and the slow race between education and technology," BOFIT Discussion Papers 12/2016, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    14. Dani Rodrik, 2010. "Diagnostics before Prescription," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 33-44, Summer.
    15. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James A., 2005. "Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth," Handbook of Economic Growth,in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 385-472 Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    property rights; human capital; investments; Venezuela.;

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.