IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rae/jourae/v90y2009i1p23-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contractualisation et diffusion spatiale des mesures agro-environnementales herbagères

Author

Listed:
  • Gilles Allaire

    () (Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, INRA Toulouse, chemin de Borde-Rouge, BP 52627, 31326 Auzeville)

  • Eric Cahuzac

    (Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural, INRA Toulouse)

  • Michel Simioni

    (Toulouse School of Economics, GREMAQ-INRA, Toulouse)

Abstract

Cet article propose une analyse de la contractualisation des mesures agro-environnementales herbagères par les éleveurs et de la diffusion géographique du processus de contractualisation. Les données individuelles mobilisées sont géo-référencées et concernent l'ensemble des éleveurs de bovins ou ovins/caprins français bénéficiant d'au moins une mesure PAC du premier pilier et ayant contracté ou non une telle mesure. Une base de données territorialisées de contexte (Observatoire des programmes communautaires de développement rural) est utilisée pour compléter l'information. Dans une première étape, les résultats provenant de l'estimation de modèles probit sur ces données individuelles montrent que l'introduction de variables de contexte en complément des caractéristiques individuelles permet d'obtenir une bonne prédiction des taux de contractualisation à un niveau géographique fin (infra-cantonal). Dans une deuxième étape, la localisation des individus est prise en compte au travers d'un effet de voisinage dans un modèle probit spatial. Les résultats montrent que les effets de proximité spatiale dus à la diversité géographique des systèmes de production et aux réseaux sociaux s'expriment essentiellement au niveau de la commune et de micro-zones (infra-cantonales).

Suggested Citation

  • Gilles Allaire & Eric Cahuzac & Michel Simioni, 2009. "Contractualisation et diffusion spatiale des mesures agro-environnementales herbagères," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 90(1), pages 23-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:rae:jourae:v:90:y:2009:i:1:p:23-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/207796/2/RAEStud-90-1-23-50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edi Defrancesco & Paola Gatto & Ford Runge & Samuele Trestini, 2008. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 114-131, February.
    2. N. Turpin & P. Dupraz & C. Thenail & A. Joannon & J. Baudry & S. Herviou & P. Verburg, 2009. "Shaping the landscape: agricultural policies and local biodiversity schemes," Post-Print hal-00453894, HAL.
    3. Pinkse, Joris & Slade, Margaret E., 1998. "Contracting in space: An application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 125-154, July.
    4. Holloway, Garth & Shankar, Bhavani & Rahman, Sanzidur, 2002. "Bayesian spatial probit estimation: a primer and an application to HYV rice adoption," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 383-402, November.
    5. Lapar, Ma. Lucila A. & Holloway, Garth J. & Ehui, Simeon K., 2003. "How Big Is Your Neighborhood? Spatial Implications Of Market Participation By Smallholder Livestock Producers," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25860, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Anselin, Luc, 2007. "Spatial econometrics in RSUE: Retrospect and prospect," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 450-456, July.
    7. Murdoch, James C. & Sandler, Todd & Vijverberg, Wim P. M., 2003. "The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: a spatial probit analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 337-362, February.
    8. Case, Anne, 1992. "Neighborhood influence and technological change," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 491-508, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coralie Calvet & Philippe Le Coënt & Claude Napoleone & Fabien Quetier, 2017. "Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes: evidence from an empirical study in Southern France »," Working Papers 17-05, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier.
    2. Kuhfuss, Laure & Jacquet, Florence & Preget, Raphaële & Thoyer, Sophie, 2012. "Le dispositif des MAEt pour l’enjeu eau : une fausse bonne idée ?," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 93(04), pages 395-422, December.
    3. Anne GASSIAT & Sylvain ROUSSET & Frèdèric ZAHM, 2011. "Improving water quality with a territorial agro-environmental policy? Insights from the new generation AES in South-West France," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1569, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agri-environmental schemes; Rural Development Program; Common Agriculture Policy; Bayesian probit; spatial dependence; social networks; geographic diffusion;

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jourae:v:90:y:2009:i:1:p:23-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Saux-Nogues). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.