IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_121_5_6137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'utilité est-elle relative ? Analyse à l'aide de données sur les ménages

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Clark

Abstract

[spa] ¿ La utilidad es acaso relativa ? análisis mediante datos sobre las familias, . por Andrew Clark.. . En este estudio los datos recientes sacados de una encuesta hecha ante familias británicas se utilizan para contribuir al análisis de los efectos de comparaciones en el seno de la función de utilidad individual. La satisfacción en el trabajo es fuerte y negativamente en correlación con el salario del cónyuge, así como con el salario medio de los demás asalariados de la familia. Además, existe un "codo" en cuantoal nivel de salario propio del individuo : un salario bajo es tante menos satisfactorio cuanto que se sitúa por debajo del salario del cónjuge o del salarie medio de los demás asalariados de la familia. Estos resultados son coherentes con una evaluación relativa del ingreso, en donde el grupo de referencia incluye a los demás asalariados del hogar. [eng] Is Utility Relative? An Analysis Based on Household Data, . by Andrew Clark.. . This study uses recent data from a survey of British households to help analyze the effects of comparisons within the individual utility function. Job satisfaction is strongly and negatively correlated with the spouse's wage as well as with the average wage of the other wage earners in the household. Moreover, there is a kink at the level of the individual's wage: a low wage is all the more unsatisfactory when it is lower than the spouse's wage or the average wage of the other wage earners in the household. These results are consistent with a relative evaluation of income in which the reference group includes the other wage earners in the household. [fre] L'utilité est-elle relative ? Analyse à l'aide de données sur les ménages, . par Andrew Clark.. . Dans cette étude, les données récentes issues d'une enquête auprès des ménages britanniques sont utilisées pour contribuer à l'analyse des effets de comparaisons au sein de la fonction d'utilité individuelle. La satisfaction dans le travail est fortement et négativement corrélée avec le salaire du conjoint, ainsi que avec le salaire moyen des autres salariées du ménage. En outre, il existe un coude au niveau du salaire propre de l'individu : un salaire bas est d'autant moins satisfaisant lorsqu'il se situe au-dessous du salaire du conjoint ou du salaire moyen des autres salariés du ménage. Ces résultats sont cohérents avec une évaluation relative du revenu, où le groupe de référence comprend les autres salariés du ménage. [ger] Ist der Nutzen relativ? Eine Analyse anhand von Daten über die Privathaushalte, . von Andrew Clark.. . In dieser Studie werden die jüngsten Daten aus einer Erhebung bei britischen Privathaushalten für die Analyse der Vergleichseffekte in der Funktion des individuellen Nutzens verwandt. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Arbeit steht in einem engen und negativen Bezug zum Lohn des Ehepartners sowie zum Durchschnittslohn der anderen Arbeitnehmerinnen eines Privathaushaltes. Ferner gibt es beim eigenen Lohn des Individuums einen Knick, da ein niedriger Lohn um so weniger zufriedenstellt, als er unterhalb des Lohns des Ehepartners oder des Durchschnittslohns der anderen Arbeitnehmer des Haushaltes liegt. Diese Ergebnisse sind kohärent zu einer relativen Einkommensbewertung, wo die Bezugsgruppe auch die anderen Arbeitnehmer des Haushalts umfaßt.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Clark, 1995. "L'utilité est-elle relative ? Analyse à l'aide de données sur les ménages," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 121(5), pages 151-164.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_121_5_6137
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1995.6137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1995.6137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_121_5_6137
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Paul W, 1990. "Trade Unions and Job Satisfaction," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(55), pages 226-248, December.
    2. Michael J. Boskin & Eytan Sheshinski, 1978. "Optimal Redistributive Taxation When Individual Welfare Depends upon Relative Income," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 589-601.
    3. Clark, Andrew E & Oswald, Andrew J, 1994. "Unhappiness and Unemployment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(424), pages 648-659, May.
    4. Gronau, Reuben, 1977. "Leisure, Home Production, and Work-The Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(6), pages 1099-1123, December.
    5. Clark, Andrew E. & Oswald, Andrew J., 1996. "Satisfaction and comparison income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 359-381, September.
    6. Browning, Martin, 1992. "Children and Household Economic Behavior," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 1434-1475, September.
    7. Layard, Richard, 1980. "Human Satisfactions and Public Policy," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(363), pages 737-750, December.
    8. Kare Johansen & Bjarne Strom, 2001. "Efficiency Wages, Interfirm Comparison, and Unemployment," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 387-402, October.
    9. Clark, Andrew E., 1999. "Are wages habit-forming? evidence from micro data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 179-200, June.
    10. Clark, Andrew E., 1997. "Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 341-372, December.
    11. Kanbur, Ravi & Haddad, Lawrence, 1994. "Are Better Off Households More Unequal or Less Unequal?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 445-458, July.
    12. Oswald, Andrew J., 1983. "Altruism, jealousy and the theory of optimal non-linear taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 77-87, February.
    13. P. J. Sloane & H. Williams, 2000. "Job Satisfaction, Comparison Earnings, and Gender," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 14(3), pages 473-502, September.
    14. Tinbergen, Jan, 1991. "On the measurement of welfare," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1-2), pages 7-13, October.
    15. Seidl, Christian, 1994. "How sensible is the Leyden individual welfare function of income?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1633-1659, October.
    16. Freeman, Richard B, 1978. "Job Satisfaction as an Economic Variable," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 135-141, May.
    17. Gary S. Becker, 1981. "A Treatise on the Family," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck81-1.
    18. Agell, Jonas & Lundborg, Per, 1992. "Fair wages, involuntary unemployment and tax policies in the simple general equilibrium model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 299-320, April.
    19. Ruut Veenhoven, 1991. "Is happiness relative?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-34, February.
    20. Andrew E. Clark, 1996. "Job Satisfaction in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 189-217, June.
    21. Clark, Andrew E. & Oswald, Andrew J. & Warr, Peter B., 1994. "Is job satisfaction u-shaped in age ?," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9407, CEPREMAP.
    22. George A. Akerlof & Andrew K. Rose & Janet L. Yellen, 1988. "Job Switching and Job Satisfaction in the U.S. Labor Market," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 19(2), pages 495-594.
    23. Frank, Robert H, 1984. "Are Workers Paid Their Marginal Products?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(4), pages 549-571, September.
    24. Wright, Robert E & Ermisch, John F, 1991. "Gender Discrimination in the British Labour Market: A Reassessment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(406), pages 508-522, May.
    25. George J. Borjas, 1979. "Job Satisfaction, Wages, and Unions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 14(1), pages 21-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Clark & Nathalie Colombier & David Masclet, 2008. "Never the same after the first time: the satisfaction of the second-generation self-employed," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(7), pages 591-609, November.
    2. Clark, Andrew E., 2001. "What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 223-242, May.
    3. Claudia Senik & Andrew E. Clark, 2007. "La croissance rend-elle heureux ? La réponse des données subjectives," PSE Working Papers halshs-00588314, HAL.
    4. Leonardo Becchetti & Luisa Corrado & Fiammetta Rossetti, 2008. "Easterlin-types and Frustrated Achievers: the Heterogeneous E¤ects of Income Changes on Life Satisfaction," CEIS Research Paper 127, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Sep 2008.
    5. Leonardo Becchetti & Luisa Corrado & Fiammetta Rossetti, 2011. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Income Changes on Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 387-406, December.
    6. Clark, Andrew E., 1997. "Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 341-372, December.
    7. Clark, Andrew E., 1999. "Are wages habit-forming? evidence from micro data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 179-200, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1995_num_121_5_6137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.