IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v7y2015i5p37.html

Productive Efficiency of Crop Farms in Viet Nam: A DEA with a Smooth Bootstrap Application

Author

Listed:
  • Truong Linh
  • Teruaki Nanseki
  • Yosuke Chomei

Abstract

Rice and maize are the two most important annual crops in Viet Nam. Rice production is sufficient for self-consumption and exportation, whereas maize production is insufficient and must be imported because of the growing feed industry. In Son La, the largest area in the Northwest with the greatest production of maize, maize is cultivated continuously all year, whereas paddy rice is cultivated mostly in the spring. To our knowledge, this article is the first study to estimate farm-level technical and scale efficiencies and to identify the factors influencing them. This study first applied a standard and smooth bootstrap DEA method to estimate the technical and scale efficiencies, then used a Tobit regression method to identify factors influencing these efficiencies among farms. The results showed that the opportunity for both technical and scale inefficiencies of maize and rice crops is insignificant. Findings from the second stage indicated that the age of the head of household, the numbers of family, the national electricity source, the distance to the nearest market, and the access to credit, extension services and milling machines are the main factors affecting the technical and scale efficiencies of rice and maize crops. The findings suggest continuing improvement of management, co-operation in cultivation, crop diversity and optimal use rice plots. The results also recommend expanding the national electricity source, emphasizing policies for adjusting customs and knowledge, using credit in appropriate ways and continuing to enhance extension services.

Suggested Citation

  • Truong Linh & Teruaki Nanseki & Yosuke Chomei, 2015. "Productive Efficiency of Crop Farms in Viet Nam: A DEA with a Smooth Bootstrap Application," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(5), pages 1-37, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/44921/25576
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/44921
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leopold Simar & Paul Wilson, 2000. "A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 779-802.
    2. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 1998. "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 49-61, January.
    3. Laure Latruffe & Kelvin Balcombe & Sophia Davidova & Katarzyna Zawalinska, 2005. "Technical and scale efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland : does specialization matte r?," Post-Print hal-02392195, HAL.
    4. Luckmann, Jonas & Ihle, Rico & Grethe, Harald & Kleinwechter, Ulrich, 2011. "Can Vietnamese Upland Farmers Profit from High World Market Prices? A Price Transmission Analysis," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114376, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Tim Coelli & Sanzidur Rahman & Colin Thirtle, 2002. "Technical, Allocative, Cost and Scale Efficiencies in Bangladesh Rice Cultivation: A Non‐parametric Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 607-626, November.
    6. Alexander Gocht & Kelvin Balcombe, 2006. "Ranking efficiency units in DEA using bootstrapping an applied analysis for Slovenian farm data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 35(2), pages 223-229, September.
    7. Binam, Joachim Nyemeck & Tonye, Jean & wandji, Njankoua & Nyambi, Gwendoline & Akoa, Mireille, 2004. "Factors affecting the technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone of Cameroon," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 531-545, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abatania, Luke N. & Hailu, Atakelty & Mugera, Amin W., 2012. "Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in Northern Ghana using bootstrap DEA," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124211, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Sokol, Ondřej & Frýd, Lukáš, 2023. "DEA efficiency in agriculture: Measurement unit issues," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Osti, Surendra & Bampasidou, Maria & Fannin, J. Matthew, "undated". "Revisiting Farm efficiency of Rice-Crawfish farmers: Accounting for the H-2A program," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274339, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Karin Larsén, 2010. "Effects of machinery‐sharing arrangements on farm efficiency: evidence from Sweden," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(5), pages 497-506, September.
    5. Bright O. Asante & Renato A. Villano & Omphile Temoso, 2024. "Drivers of integrated crop–livestock farming system’s efficiency for smallholder farmers in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29429-29451, November.
    6. ANANG, Benjamin Tetteh, . "Two-stage DEA estimation of technical efficiency: comparison of different estimators," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 25(01).
    7. Thibbotuwawa, Manoj & Mugera, Amin W. & White, Benedict, 2012. "A Non-Parametric Analysis of Rice Production Efficiency in Sri Lanka," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124423, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Le Thi Thu Huong & Luu Van Duy & Bui Phung Khanh Hoa & Bui Thi Nga & Nguyen Van Phuong, 2025. "Does Formal Contract Farming Improve the Technical Efficiency of Livestock Farmers? A Case Study of Fattening Pig Production in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Geissler, Bernhard & Mew, Michael C. & Weber, Olaf & Steiner, Gerald, 2015. "Efficiency performance of the world's leading corporations in phosphate rock mining," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PB), pages 246-258.
    10. Le Thi Thu Huong & Yoshifumi Takahashi & Luu Duy & Pham Bao Duong & Do Kim Chung & Cao Truong Son & Nguyen Hai Nui & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2025. "Feeding modes and technical efficiency of small pig holders in Vietnam: a case study in Hanoi," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 14419-14435, June.
    11. Vu Hoang Linh, 2012. "Efficiency of rice farming households in Vietnam," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 60-73, April.
    12. Glynn T. Tonsor & Allen M. Featherstone, 2009. "Production Efficiency of Specialized Swine Producers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 493-510, September.
    13. Ahmed, Nesar & Zander, Kerstin K. & Garnett, Stephen T., 2011. "Socioeconomic aspects of rice-fish farming in Bangladesh: opportunities, challenges and production efficiency," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(2), pages 1-21.
    14. Fleur Wouterse, 2010. "Migration and technical efficiency in cereal production: evidence from Burkina Faso," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(5), pages 385-395, September.
    15. Tamer Işgın & Remziye Özel & Abdulbaki Bilgiç & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Mehmet Reşit Sevinç, 2020. "DEA Performance Measurements in Cotton Production of Harran Plain, Turkey: A Single and Double Bootstrap Truncated Regression Approaches," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499.
    18. Léopold Simar & Paul Wilson, 2000. "Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 49-78, January.
    19. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2015. "Measuring Seaports' Productivity: A Malmquist Productivity Index Decomposition Approach," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(2), pages 355-376, April.
    20. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2018. "Productivity and efficiency in high-potential areas," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 7, pages 149-180, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.