IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3906-d1643030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciphering the Intricate Influence of Greenwashing and Environmental Performance on Financial Outcome Through Panel VAR/GMM Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mangenda Tshiaba Sidney

    (School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Gaoke Liao

    (School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

This study explores the intricate interconnections between greenwashing, environmental performance (ESG), firm-specific characteristics, board composition, firm age, size, leverage, carbon emissions (CO 2 ), and financial performance. By applying a combination of panel VAR/GMM estimation, robust least squares regression, and Granger causality tests, the research draws upon comprehensive data spanning from 2009 to 2022 sourced from the Chinese Research Data Services Platform (CNRDS), Bloomberg, and Refinitiv. The dataset comprises 312 listed Chinese firms, yielding a total of 5335 observations. The findings reveal that past return on equity acts as a reinforcing mechanism for both financial performance and ESG outcomes, as it positively affects subsequent returns and environmental engagement. However, its influence on firm size, board structure, and Tobin’s Q is statistically insignificant. Additionally, greenwashing demonstrates a dual character: while it reflects strong internal consistency, it also significantly shapes environmental outcomes and market perceptions. Firm size stands out as a pivotal determinant. It exhibits high persistence over time and plays a crucial role in shaping governance structures and capital allocation decisions. Moreover, board composition is positively associated with firm size. Leverage and return on assets show consistent temporal persistence and exert substantial influence on various firm attributes. Although leverage may contribute positively under favorable conditions, its overall impact on sustainability and governance practices appears limited. Higher carbon emissions are associated with increased ESG disclosures, whereas stronger ESG performance contributes to emission reduction and modestly enhances financial outcomes. Tobin’s Q also emerges as a critical factor, significantly influencing sustainability practices. This suggests that firms respond to investor expectations by improving their ESG performance. Results from the robust least squares regression underscore the dominant roles of firm size, Tobin’s Q, and leverage in driving financial performance. In contrast, ESG scores, CO 2 emissions, and greenwashing do not exhibit any statistically significant direct effects on financial performance. Granger causality tests confirm unidirectional relationships from financial performance to key structural variables such as size, leverage, firm age, and Tobin’s Q. A notable bidirectional causal link is observed between return on assets and return on equity. However, sustainability and governance-related variables show no causal impact on financial performance. Overall, the study acknowledges limitations and offers policy recommendations along with directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mangenda Tshiaba Sidney & Gaoke Liao, 2025. "Deciphering the Intricate Influence of Greenwashing and Environmental Performance on Financial Outcome Through Panel VAR/GMM Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3906-:d:1643030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chih-Hai Yang & Ku-Hsieh Chen, 2009. "Are small firms less efficient?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 375-395, April.
    2. Ioannis Ioannou & George Kassinis & Giorgos Papagiannakis, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 333-347, June.
    3. Alex Coad & Jacob Rubæk Holm & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2018. "Firm age and performance," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    5. Yongbo Sun & Binbin Shi, 2022. "Impact of Greenwashing Perception on Consumers’ Green Purchasing Intentions: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    7. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Newey, Whitney & Rosen, Harvey S, 1988. "Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1371-1395, November.
    8. Boone, Audra L. & Casares Field, Laura & Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Raheja, Charu G., 2007. "The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 66-101, July.
    9. C. Bhattacharya & Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen, 2009. "Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 257-272, April.
    10. Trinks, Arjan & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2020. "An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Laura Chiaramonte & Alberto Dreassi & Claudia Girardone & Stefano Piserà, 2022. "Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(12), pages 1173-1211, August.
    12. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L., 2023. "Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?☆," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    13. Ploypailin Kijkasiwat & Pongsutti Phuensane, 2020. "Innovation and Firm Performance: The Moderating and Mediating Roles of Firm Size and Small and Medium Enterprise Finance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Wei Li & Weining Li & Veikko Seppänen & Timo Koivumäki, 2023. "Effects of greenwashing on financial performance: Moderation through local environmental regulation and media coverage," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 820-841, January.
    15. Love, Inessa & Zicchino, Lea, 2006. "Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 190-210, May.
    16. Jin, Xingye & Li, David Daokui & Wu, Shuyu, 2016. "How will China shape the world economy?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 272-280.
    17. Nirino, Niccolò & Santoro, Gabriele & Miglietta, Nicola & Quaglia, Roberto, 2021. "Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Knez, Peter J & Ready, Mark J, 1997. "On the Robustness of Size and Book-to-Market in Cross-Sectional Regressions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(4), pages 1355-1382, September.
    19. Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Zhou, Ping & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2006. "The emergence of China as a leading nation in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 83-104, February.
    21. Nikolaos Sariannidis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Grigoris Giannarakis & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2013. "CO2 Emissions and Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Firms: An Empirical Survey," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 109-120, February.
    22. Bhagat, Sanjai & Bolton, Brian, 2008. "Corporate governance and firm performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 257-273, June.
    23. Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Jakub Horák & Liudmyla Starchenko & Waldemar Gajda, 2020. "Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing under Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    24. Moeller, Sara B. & Schlingemann, Frederik P. & Stulz, Rene M., 2004. "Firm size and the gains from acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 201-228, August.
    25. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    26. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lips, Johannes, 2018. "Debt and the Oil Industry - Analysis on the Firm and Production Level," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181504, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2013. "Fiscal Policy And Asset Prices," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 154-177, April.
    3. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2011. "Can Fiscal Policy Stimulus Boost Economic Recovery?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 62(6), pages 1045-1066.
    4. Joan Costa-Font & Cristina Vilaplana-Prieto, 2023. "‘Investing’ in care for old age? An examination of long-term care expenditure dynamics and its spillovers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Medina-Durango, Carlos Alberto & Posso Suárez, Christian Manuel & Tamayo, Jorge A. & Monsalve, Emma, 2012. "Dinámica de la demanda laboral en la industria manufacturera colombiana 1993-2009 : una estimación panel VAR," Chapters, in: Arango-Thomas, Luis Eduardo & Hamann-Salcedo, Franz Alonso (ed.), El mercado de trabajo en Colombia : hechos, tendencias e instituciones, chapter 7, pages 289-330, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    6. Al-Jahwari, Salim Ahmed Said, 2021. "Does the Twin-Deficits doctrine apply to the Gulf Cooperation Council? A dynamic panel VAR-X model approach," MPRA Paper 111232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jan Babecky & Tomas Havranek & Jakub Mateju & Marek Rusnak & Katerina Smidkova & Borek Vasicek, 2011. "Early Warning Indicators of Economic Crises: Evidence from a Panel of 40 Developed Countries," Working Papers 2011/08, Czech National Bank.
    8. Wintoki, M. Babajide & Linck, James S. & Netter, Jeffry M., 2012. "Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 581-606.
    9. Baldwin, Kenneth & Alhalboni, Maryam, 2023. "A value-based measure of market power for the participatory deposits of Islamic banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Ryan H. Murphy & Colin O’Reilly, 2019. "Applying panel vector autoregression to institutions, human capital, and output," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 1633-1652, November.
    11. Baiju Pallayil & Sunil Kumar Ambrammal, 2022. "Size and performance of Indian manufacturing firms: new evidence from dynamic panel system GMM approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(12), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Sigmund, Michael & Ferstl, Robert, 2021. "Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 693-720.
    13. Björn Brey & Matthias S. Hertweck, 2023. "The dynamic effects of monsoon rainfall shocks on agricultural yield, wages, and food prices in India," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(3), pages 616-654, July.
    14. Timo MITZE & Björn ALECKE & Gerhard UNTIEDT, 2008. "Determinants of Interregional Migration Among German States and its Implications for Reducing East-West Disparities: Results from a Panel VAR Using Efficient GMM Estimation," EcoMod2008 23800089, EcoMod.
    15. Marcello Pagnini & Paola Rossi & Valerio Vacca & Michael Sigmund & Ulrich Gunter & Gerald Krenn, 2017. "How Do Macroeconomic and Bank-specific Variables Influence Profitability in the Austrian Banking Sector? Evidence from a Panel Vector Autoregression Analysis," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 46(3), pages 555-586, November.
    16. Dwyer, Gerald P. & Gilevska, Biljana & Nieto, Maria J. & Samartín, Margarita, 2023. "The effects of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policies from 2011 to 2018 on banking assets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Björn Alecke & Timo Mitze & Gerhard Untiedt, 2010. "Internal migration, regional labour market dynamics and implications for German East-West disparities: results from a Panel VAR," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 30(2), pages 159-189, September.
    18. Kacou Yves Thierry Kacou & Yacouba Kassouri & Andrew Adewale Alola & Mehmet Altuntaş, 2022. "Examining the sustainable development approach of migrants' remittances and financial development in sub‐Saharan African countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 804-816, October.
    19. Tuomas A. Peltonen & Ricardo M. Sousa & Isabel S. Vansteenkiste, 2011. "Fundamentals, Financial Factors, and the Dynamics of Investment in Emerging Markets," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(0), pages 88-105, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3906-:d:1643030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.