IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10504-d1533383.html

Cooperative Innovation Under the “Belt and Road Initiative” for Reducing Carbon Emissions: An Estimation Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kaicheng Zhang

    (School of History and Culture, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Kai Liu

    (School of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center of Human-Nature and Green Development in Universities of Shandong, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Caihong Huang

    (School of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center of Human-Nature and Green Development in Universities of Shandong, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative holds significant importance for achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goals 9 and 17. Drawing on data from the Web of Science database, the BRI database, and the World Bank database, this study explores the potential carbon emission reduction effects that cooperative innovations may bring to participating countries under the Belt and Road Initiative. The study constructs variable endogenous spatio-temporal weight matrices based on initial spatial weight matrices and, drawing on trends in co-authored publications, innovatively establishes time dummy variables and event dummy variables in a difference-in-differences (DID) model. This approach fully considers the interconnected, shared model of the Belt and Road Initiative and the spatial effects of policy implementation. A spatial DID model was established for 106 BRI participating countries and regions from 2005 to 2021. The results reveal the following: first, cooperative innovation under the BRI significantly reduces carbon emission intensity in participating countries. Second, the BRI primarily achieves carbon reduction through investment, innovation, and trade mechanisms. Third, the results of the global SDID model indicate that cooperative innovation with China negatively impacts carbon emission intensity. Also, this effect exhibits spatial spillover, suggesting that there is a policy spillover effect. Fourth, the decomposition of local policy shock effects indicates that the influences of cooperative innovation exhibit spatial heterogeneity, with varying degrees of direct and indirect effects on carbon emission intensity across different countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaicheng Zhang & Kai Liu & Caihong Huang, 2024. "Cooperative Innovation Under the “Belt and Road Initiative” for Reducing Carbon Emissions: An Estimation Based on the Spatial Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10504-:d:1533383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Sousa, José & Mayer, Thierry & Zignago, Soledad, 2012. "Market access in global and regional trade," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1037-1052.
    2. Delgado, Michael S. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2015. "Difference-in-differences techniques for spatial data: Local autocorrelation and spatial interaction," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 123-126.
    3. Chagas, André L.S. & Azzoni, Carlos R. & Almeida, Alexandre N., 2016. "A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 24-36.
    4. Jean Dubé & Diègo Legros, 2013. "A spatio-temporal measure of spatial dependence: An example using real estate data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 19-30, March.
    5. Changzheng Zhu & Dawei Gao, 2019. "A Research on the Factors Influencing Carbon Emission of Transportation Industry in “the Belt and Road Initiative” Countries Based on Panel Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Song, Yanwu & Zhang, Jinrui & Song, Yingkang & Fan, Xinran & Zhu, Yuqing & Zhang, Chen, 2020. "Can industry-university-research collaborative innovation efficiency reduce carbon emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/10187 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Yan Wu & Chunlai Chen & Cong Hu, 2021. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative Increase the Carbon Emission Intensity of Participating Countries?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(3), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Mirziyoyeva, Ziroat & Salahodjaev, Raufhon, 2022. "Renewable energy and CO2 emissions intensity in the top carbon intense countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 507-512.
    10. Henryk Dzwigol & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Renewable Energy, Knowledge Spillover and Innovation: Capacity of Environmental Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Diao, Mi & Leonard, Delon & Sing, Tien Foo, 2017. "Spatial-difference-in-differences models for impact of new mass rapid transit line on private housing values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 64-77.
    12. Fernando Ascensão & Lenore Fahrig & Anthony P. Clevenger & Richard T. Corlett & Jochen A. G. Jaeger & William F. Laurance & Henrique M. Pereira, 2018. "Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 206-209, May.
    13. Robert Agwot Komakech & Thomas Ogoro Ombati, 2023. "Belt and Road Initiative in Developing Countries: Lessons from Five Selected Countries in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. de Faria, Pedro & Lima, Francisco & Santos, Rui, 2010. "Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1082-1092, October.
    15. Spyros Arvanitis & Thomas Bolli, 2013. "A Comparison of National and International Innovation Cooperation in Five European Countries," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 43(3), pages 163-191, November.
    16. Eric Yongchen Zou, 2021. "Unwatched Pollution: The Effect of Intermittent Monitoring on Air Quality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2101-2126, July.
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/10187 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Natalia A. Chernysheva & Victoria V. Perskaya & Alexander M. Petrov & Anna A. Bakulina, 2019. "Green Energy for Belt and Road Initiative: Economic Aspects Today and in the Future," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 178-185.
    19. Hamid Jafarzadeh & Dongfeng Yang, 2023. "Impacts of the Belt and Roads Initiative on Sustainability: Local Approaches to Spatial Restructuring in the Aras Special Economic Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Hunt, Jennifer & Cockburn, Iain & Bessen, James, 2024. "Is distance from innovation a barrier to the adoption of artificial intelligence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Wang, H. & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2017. "A Multi-region Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global CO2 Emission Intensity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 163-176.
    22. Yingzhi Xu & Biying Dong & Zihao Chen, 2022. "Can foreign trade and technological innovation affect green development: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 1063-1090, May.
    23. Fan, Jing-Li & Da, Ya-Bin & Wan, Si-Lai & Zhang, Mian & Cao, Zhe & Wang, Yu & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "Determinants of carbon emissions in ‘Belt and Road initiative’ countries: A production technology perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 268-279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reinhold Kosfeld & Timo Mitze & Johannes Rode & Klaus Wälde, 2021. "The Covid‐19 containment effects of public health measures: A spatial difference‐in‐differences approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 799-825, September.
    2. Nicolas Debarsy & Julie Le Gallo, 2025. "Identification of Spatial Spillovers: Do's and Don'ts," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 2152-2173, December.
    3. Shanxia Sun & Michael S. Delgado, 2024. "Local spatial difference-in-differences models: treatment correlations, response interactions, and expanded local models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2077-2107, November.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-04549691 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bardaka, Eleni & Delgado, Michael S. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2018. "Causal identification of transit-induced gentrification and spatial spillover effects: The case of the Denver light rail," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-31.
    6. Xiao, Zhaohua & Du, Limin & Wang, Zheng, 2023. "The Belt, the Road, and the carbon emissions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Shen, Jianfu & Peng, Daoju & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Fan, Kwok Yuen, 2025. "Performance measurability, local government’s incentives, and regional air pollution reduction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Qiu, Feng & Tong, Qingmeng, 2021. "A spatial difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the impact of light rail transit on property values," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Bardaka, Eleni & Delgado, Michael S. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2019. "A spatial multiple treatment/multiple outcome difference-in-differences model with an application to urban rail infrastructure and gentrification," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 325-345.
    10. Zhu, Chen & Xia, Yuqing & Liu, Qing & Hou, Bojun, 2023. "Deregulation and green innovation: Does cultural reform pilot project matter," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-105.
    11. Zhang, Yaoyu & Liu, Jin & Wang, Bo, 2022. "The impact of High-Speed Rails on urban expansion: An investigation using an SDID with dynamic effects method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    12. Calvert Jump, Robert & Scavette, Adam, 2024. "JUE Insight: The labor market effects of place-based policies: Evidence from England’s Neighbourhood Renewal Fund," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Xiaoying Zhong & Guanghai Liu & Peng Chen & Kaili Ke & Ruhe Xie, 2022. "The Impact of Internet Development on Urban Eco-Efficiency—A Quasi-Natural Experiment of “Broadband China” Pilot Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Thais Waideman Niquito & Fernando Pozzobon & Vinícius Halmenschlager & Felipe Garcia Ribeiro, 2021. "Human-made disasters and economic impact for a developing economy: evidence from Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2313-2341, December.
    15. Spyros Arvanitis & Areti Gkypali & Kostas Tsekouras, 2014. "Knowledge Base, Exporting Activities, Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 14-361, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    16. Shiqin Su & Siying Li, 2025. "Energy efficiency suppression and spatial spillover effect: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6397-6422, March.
    17. Aparicio, Genoveva & Camacho, Maximo & Maté-Sánchez-Val, Mariluz, 2024. "Quantifying the impact: Are coastal areas impoverished by marine pollution?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. João Augusto Ferreira Freire & Eduardo Gonçalves, 2022. "Cooperation in Innovative Efforts: a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3364-3400, December.
    19. Zhang, Yiren & Ran, Congjing, 2023. "Effect of digital economy on air pollution in China? New evidence from the “National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Area” policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 986-1004.
    20. Wang, Changjian & Miao, Zhuang & Chen, Xiaodong & Cheng, Yu, 2021. "Factors affecting changes of greenhouse gas emissions in Belt and Road countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    21. Parady, Giancarlos & Chikaraishi, Makoto & Oyama, Yuki, 2025. "A walker's paradise ain't a driver's hell: Evaluating the causal effect of temporary road pedestrianization on traffic conditions of surrounding roads," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10504-:d:1533383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.