IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/resene/v83y2025ics0928765525000351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Something for nothing? The effect of voluntary environmental program on energy intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, En-Ze
  • Xu, Jiangchuan

Abstract

The environmental outcomes of voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) remain a controversial issue, especially in developing countries. We advance this subject by examining the impact of the ISO14001 Environmental Management System on firm-level energy intensity in China. The paper applies a difference-in-differences approach combined with propensity score matching to a unique panel dataset including all manufacturing firms obtaining ISO14001 certification during the period of 2008–2016. The results indicate that although VEP increases both energy consumption and output, the impact on output is significantly greater, leading to a reduction in energy intensity. This reduction is primarily achieved through capital upgrades and innovation rather than foreign trade. Furthermore, VEP exhibits spillover effects at the supply chain level, primarily benefiting upstream firms through mercantile credit rather than downstream firms. Finally, firms continue to benefit from VEP even after exiting this program, as their energy intensity does not increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, En-Ze & Xu, Jiangchuan, 2025. "Something for nothing? The effect of voluntary environmental program on energy intensity," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:resene:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0928765525000351
    DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765525000351
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:resene:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0928765525000351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505569 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.