IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial targeting of agri-environmental policy using bilevel evolutionary optimization


  • Whittaker, Gerald
  • Färe, Rolf
  • Grosskopf, Shawna
  • Barnhart, Bradley
  • Bostian, Moriah
  • Mueller-Warrant, George
  • Griffith, Stephen


In this study we describe the optimal designation of agri-environmental policy as a bilevel optimization problem and propose an integrated solution method using a hybrid genetic algorithm. The problem is characterized by a single leader, the agency, that establishes a policy with the goal of optimizing its own objectives, and multiple followers, the producers, who respond by complying with the policy in a way that maximizes their own objectives. We assume that the leader has perfect knowledge of policy outcomes for all parameterizations of agri-environmental policy. We use a hybrid genetic algorithm to simulate perfect knowledge of all policy outcomes in a bilevel optimization. Our hybrid genetic algorithm integrates a biophysical model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool; SWAT) with an economic model (profit maximization; DEA). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is included to specify agency environmental objectives, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to model producer behavior in response to agri-environmental policy. We applied the resulting integrated modeling system to the analysis of an input tax on fertilizer in the Calapooia watershed in Oregon, USA. Application of the incentive policy at different geographical resolutions showed that bilevel optimization is effective for calculating optimal spatial targeting of agri-environmental policy. Surprisingly, the presented algorithm found multiple different policy configurations that achieved nearly identical results for the upper level (agency) objectives. This observation raises the possibility that additional objectives could incorporate equity, equality of outcome, and policy initiatives such as support for small farms at no additional cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Whittaker, Gerald & Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Barnhart, Bradley & Bostian, Moriah & Mueller-Warrant, George & Griffith, Stephen, 2017. "Spatial targeting of agri-environmental policy using bilevel evolutionary optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 15-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:66:y:2017:i:pa:p:15-27
    DOI: 10.1016/

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Sergey S. Rabotyagov & Adriana M. Valcu & Catherine L. Kling, 2014. "Reversing Property Rights: Practice-Based Approaches for Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint-source Water Pollution When Emissions Aggregate Nonlinearly," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(2), pages 397-419.
    2. Liu, Ruimin & Zhang, Peipei & Wang, Xiujuan & Chen, Yaxin & Shen, Zhenyao, 2013. "Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 9-18.
    3. Aftab, Ashar & Hanley, Nick & Baiocchi, Giovanni, 2010. "Integrated regulation of nonpoint pollution: Combining managerial controls and economic instruments under multiple environmental targets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 24-33, November.
    4. Marco Di Zio & Mauro Scanu & Lucia Coppola & Orietta Luzi & Alessandra Ponti, 2004. "Bayesian networks for imputation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 309-322, May.
    5. Christine N. Kohnen & Jerome P. Reiter, 2009. "Multiple imputation for combining confidential data owned by two agencies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 511-528, April.
    6. Helming, John, 1998. "Effects of nitrogen input and nitrogen surplus taxes in Dutch agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 49.
    7. John Helming, 1998. "Effects of nitrogen input and nitrogen surplus taxes in Dutch agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 49, pages 5-31.
    8. Wen-yuan Huang & Michael LeBlanc, 1994. "Market-Based Incentives for Addressing Non-Point Water Quality Problems: A Residual Nitrogen Tax Approach," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 16(3), pages 427-440.
    9. Erica Gaddis & Alexey Voinov & Ralf Seppelt & Donna Rizzo, 2014. "Spatial Optimization of Best Management Practices to Attain Water Quality Targets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(6), pages 1485-1499, April.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Choi, E. Kwan & Feinerman, Eli, 1995. "Regulation Of Nitrogen Pollution: Taxes Versus Quotas," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Philip W. Gassman & Manuel R. Reyes & Colleen H. Green & Jeffrey G. Arnold, 2007. "Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 07-wp443, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    13. Renan-Ulrich Goetz & Hansjörg Schmid & Bernard Lehmann, 2006. "Determining the economic gains from regulation at the extensive and intensive margins," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 1-30, March.
    14. Balana, Bedru Babulo & Vinten, Andy & Slee, Bill, 2011. "A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1021-1031, April.
    15. S. S. Rabotyagov & C. L. Kling & P. W. Gassman & N. N. Rabalais & R. E. Turner, 2014. "The Economics of Dead Zones: Causes, Impacts, Policy Challenges, and a Model of the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 58-79, January.
    16. John Helming, 1998. "Effects of nitrogen input and nitrogen surplus taxes in Dutch agriculture," Post-Print hal-01200911, HAL.
    17. Liang Liang & Zhao-Qiong Li & Wade Cook & Joe Zhu, 2011. "Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 309-322.
    18. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    19. Petsakos, Athanasios & Jayet, Pierre-Alain, 2010. "Evaluating the efficiency of a N-input tax under different policy scenarios at different scales," 120th Seminar, September 2-4, 2010, Chania, Crete 109397, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2013. "Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 111-138, June.
    21. Ribaudo, Marc & Horan, Richard D. & Smith, Mark E., 1999. "Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice," Agricultural Economic Reports 33913, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    22. Amacher, Gregory S. & Malik, Arun S., 1998. "Instrument Choice When Regulators and Firms Bargain," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 225-241, May.
    23. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    24. Whittaker, Gerald & Confesor Jr., Remegio & Griffith, Stephen M. & Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Steiner, Jeffrey J. & Mueller-Warrant, George W. & Banowetz, Gary M., 2009. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for multiobjective problems with activity analysis-based local search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 195-203, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Juan F. Monge, 2020. "A Well-Defined Composite Indicator: An Application to Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 299-323, July.
    2. Matthew C. LaFevor & Alexandra G. Ponette-González & Rebecca Larson & Leah M. Mungai, 2021. "Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Maravillo, Héctor & Camacho-Vallejo, José-Fernando & Puerto, Justo & Labbé, Martine, 2020. "A market regulation bilevel problem: A case study of the Mexican petrochemical industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Kropp, Ian & Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan & Deb, Kalyanmoy & Abouali, Mohammad & Roy, Proteek C. & Adhikari, Umesh & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2019. "A multi-objective approach to water and nutrient efficiency for sustainable agricultural intensification," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 289-302.
    6. Han, Jialin & Hu, Yaoguang & Mao, Mingsong & Wan, Shuping, 2020. "A multi-objective districting problem applied to agricultural machinery maintenance service network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1120-1130.
    7. Wang, Delu & Liu, Yifei & Wang, Yadong & Shi, Xunpeng & Song, Xuefeng, 2020. "Allocation of coal de-capacity quota among provinces in China: A bi-level multi-objective combinatorial optimization approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Zou, Juan & Yang, Xu & Liu, Zhongbing & Liu, Jiangyang & Zhang, Ling & Zheng, Jinhua, 2021. "Multiobjective bilevel optimization algorithm based on preference selection to solve energy hub system planning problems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Müller, Berndt & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2020. "Aufbau und Bewertung des Agrarumwelt- und Biodiversitätskonzeptes (AUBI) im Maßnahmenraum Südhessen," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305585, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann, M. & Hediger, W. & Peter, S., 2008. "Reducing nitrogen losses from agricultural systems – an integrated economic assessment," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    2. Hongxing Liu & Wendong Zhang & Elena Irwin & Jeffrey Kast & Noel Aloysius & Jay Martin & Margaret Kalcic, 2020. "Best Management Practices and Nutrient Reduction: An Integrated Economic-Hydrologic Model of the Western Lake Erie Basin," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(4), pages 510-530.
    3. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Philippe Le Goffe & Julien Salanie, 2005. "Pricing manure spreading rights: measure from the land market," Post-Print hal-02338151, HAL.
    5. Cyril Bourgeois & Nosra Ben-Fradj & Mélissa Clodic & Pierre-Alain Jayet, 2011. "How cost-effective is a mixed policy targeting the management of three pollutants from N-fertilizers," Working Papers 2011/03, INRA, Economie Publique.
    6. Philippe Le Goffe & Dominique Vermersch, 2004. "Le marché de l'épandage peut-il réduire le coût de la résorption des excédents d'azote ?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 279(1), pages 20-32.
    7. Cyril Bourgeois & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Florence Habets & Pascal Viennot, 2018. "Estimating the Marginal Social Value of Agriculturally Driven Nitrate Concentrations in an Aquifer: A Combined Theoretical-Applied Approach," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Grenestam, Erik & Nordin, Martin, 2018. "Estimating the impact of agri-environmental payments on nutrient runoff using a unique combination of data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 388-398.
    9. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Aftab, Ashar & Hanley, Nick & Baiocchi, Giovanni, 2017. "Transferability of Policies to Control Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution in Relatively Similar Catchments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 11-21.
    11. Li, Wanghong & Li, Zhepeng & Liang, Liang & Cook, Wade D., 2017. "Evaluation of ecological systems and the recycling of undesirable outputs: An efficiency study of regions in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 77-86.
    12. Adenuga, Adewale Henry & Davis, John & Hutchinson, George & Patton, Myles & Donnellan, Trevor, 2020. "Analysis of the effect of alternative agri-environmental policy instruments on production performance and nitrogen surplus of representative dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Chu, Junfei & Zhu, Joe, 2021. "Production scale-based two-stage network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 283-294.
    14. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 3-15.
    15. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Jun Zhuang, 2018. "Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: a two-stage DEA-based approach," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 23-68, January.
    16. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.
    17. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    18. Imanirad, Raha & Cook, Wade D. & Aviles-Sacoto, Sonia Valeria & Zhu, Joe, 2015. "Partial input to output impacts in DEA: The case of DMU-specific impacts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 837-844.
    19. H. Pierre Hsieh & Yueh‐Cheng Wu & Wen‐Min Lu & Yao‐Chieh Chen, 2020. "Assessing and ranking the innovation ability and business performance of global companies in the aerospace and defense industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 952-963, September.
    20. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:66:y:2017:i:pa:p:15-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.