IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v321y2025ics0360544225011570.html

Climate change and marginal abatement cost: Policy insights on international treaty

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Meiying
  • Shen, Zhi-Yang
  • Baležentis, Tomas
  • Chen, Xueli

Abstract

This study examines the economic implications of climate policies, specifically evaluating the effectiveness of Kyoto Protocol (and the institutional setting emerging from it) in reducing carbon emissions. By analyzing data from 36 OECD countries between 1992 and 2019, we assess marginal abatement costs and evaluate the impact of the Kyoto Protocol. The findings indicate that the protocol relates to an increase in marginal abatement costs, with renewable energy consumption and environmental patents also playing significant roles. Based on these results, we propose policy recommendations that emphasize strict adherence to the Paris Agreement, increased use of renewable energy, and incentives for environmental innovation. By highlighting the economic mechanisms behind climate policy effectiveness, this study enhances our understanding of the challenges and opportunities in mitigating climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Meiying & Shen, Zhi-Yang & Baležentis, Tomas & Chen, Xueli, 2025. "Climate change and marginal abatement cost: Policy insights on international treaty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:321:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225011570
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225011570
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aichele, Rahel & Felbermayr, Gabriel, 2012. "Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 336-354.
    2. Cai, Jinyang & Zheng, Huanyu & Vardanyan, Michael & Shen, Zhiyang, 2023. "Achieving carbon neutrality through green technological progress: evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Lazkano, Itziar & Nøstbakken, Linda & Pelli, Martino, 2017. "From fossil fuels to renewables: The role of electricity storage," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 113-129.
    4. Springer, Urs, 2003. "The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: a survey of model studies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 527-551, September.
    5. Zheng, Li & Yuan, Ling & Khan, Zeeshan & Badeeb, Ramez Abubakr & Zhang, Leilei, 2023. "How G-7 countries are paving the way for net-zero emissions through energy efficient ecosystem?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Westerlund, Joakim & Edgerton, David L., 2007. "A panel bootstrap cointegration test," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 185-190, December.
    7. Ji, D.J. & Zhou, P., 2020. "Marginal abatement cost, air pollution and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Peihao Lai & Minzhe Du & Bing Wang & Ziyue Chen, 2016. "Assessment and Decomposition of Total Factor Energy Efficiency: An Evidence Based on Energy Shadow Price in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Quinn, Barry & Gallagher, Ronan & Kuosmanen, Timo, 2023. "Lurking in the shadows: The impact of CO2 emissions target setting on carbon pricing in the Kyoto agreement period," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Lee, Chia-Yen & Wang, Ke, 2019. "Nash marginal abatement cost estimation of air pollutant emissions using the stochastic semi-nonparametric frontier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 390-400.
    11. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    12. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    13. Zhou, X. & Fan, L.W. & Zhou, P., 2015. "Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 109-117.
    14. James H. Stock & Motohiro Yogo, 2002. "Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression," NBER Technical Working Papers 0284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Grunewald, Nicole & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2016. "Did the Kyoto Protocol fail? An evaluation of the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emissions," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Ahlvik, Lassi & van den Bijgaart, Inge, 2024. "Screening green innovation through carbon pricing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Chen Shi & Yujiao Xian & Zhixin Wang & Ke Wang, 2023. "Marginal abatement cost curve of carbon emissions in China: a functional data analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Trang My Tran, 2022. "International Environmental Agreement and Trade in Environmental Goods: The Case of Kyoto Protocol," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(2), pages 341-379, October.
    19. He, Yiqi & Li, Zhihui & Wang, Xinyue & Chen, Xi, 2025. "Government investment, human capital flow, and urban innovation: Evidence from smart city construction in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Wu, F. & Wang, S.Y. & Zhou, P., 2023. "Marginal abatement cost of carbon dioxide emissions: The role of abatement options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 891-901.
    21. Rahel Aichele & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2013. "The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 731-757, September.
    22. Carraro, Carlo & Siniscalco, Domenico, 1995. "R&D Cooperation and the Stability of International Environmental Agreements," CEPR Discussion Papers 1154, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    23. Jaforullah, Mohammad & King, Alan, 2015. "Does the use of renewable energy sources mitigate CO2 emissions? A reassessment of the US evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 711-717.
    24. Limin Du & Aoife Hanley & Chu Wei, 2015. "Marginal Abatement Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China: A Parametric Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(2), pages 191-216, June.
    25. Ghisetti, Claudia & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Green Technologies and Environmental Productivity: A Cross-sectoral Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects in Italian Regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-13.
    26. Zhiyang Shen & Tomas Balezentis, 2023. "Devising evidence-based strategies for progress towards zero-carbon energy at the country level: The by-production approach," Post-Print hal-04277474, HAL.
    27. Pesaran M.H. & Schuermann T. & Weiner S.M., 2004. "Modeling Regional Interdependencies Using a Global Error-Correcting Macroeconometric Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 129-162, April.
    28. Miyamoto, Mai & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2019. "Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1331-1338.
    29. Dogan, Eyup & Chishti, Muhammad Zubair & Karimi Alavijeh, Nooshin & Tzeremes, Panayiotis, 2022. "The roles of technology and Kyoto Protocol in energy transition towards COP26 targets: Evidence from the novel GMM-PVAR approach for G-7 countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    30. Almer, Christian & Winkler, Ralph, 2017. "Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 125-151.
    31. Eren Cifci & Matthew E. Oliver, 2018. "Reassessing the Links between GHG Emissions, Economic Growth, and the UNFCCC: A Difference-in-Differences Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    32. Maamoun, Nada, 2019. "The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-256.
    33. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    34. Baker, Erin & Clarke, Leon & Shittu, Ekundayo, 2008. "Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 2799-2816, November.
    35. Wang, Zhaohua & Song, Yanwu & Shen, Zhiyang, 2022. "Global sustainability of carbon shadow pricing: The distance between observed and optimal abatement costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Fuqing Zhang & Yubo Ding, 2025. "Coupled Assessment of Land Use Changes and Ecological Benefits Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cary, Michael, 2025. "Post-Kyoto emissions in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Cary, Michael & Stephens, Heather M., 2024. "Economic, environmental, and technical gains from the Kyoto Protocol: Evidence from cement manufacturing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Tran, Trang, 2020. "International Environmental Agreement and Trade in Environmental Goods: The Case of Kyoto Protocol," Conference papers 333198, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Cary, Michael, 2023. "Climate policy boosts trade competitiveness: Evidence from timber trade networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Miyamoto, Mai & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2019. "Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1331-1338.
    6. Rios, Vicente & Gianmoena, Lisa, 2018. "Convergence in CO2 emissions: A spatial economic analysis with cross-country interactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 222-238.
    7. Uğur Ayık & Gökhan Erkal & Ömer Yalçınkaya, 2026. "Examining the impact of environmental technologies on carbon emissions in G-20 countries: an alternative environmental hypothesis proposal (EGC)," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1-35, April.
    8. Doan, Nguyen & Doan, Huong & Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Nguyen, Binh Quang, 2024. "From Kyoto to Paris and beyond: A deep dive into the green shift," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Yin, Kai & Yao, Xin, 2025. "How has China's urban compactness affected urban CO2 abatement costs?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    10. Kuriyama, Akihisa & Abe, Naoya, 2018. "Ex-post assessment of the Kyoto Protocol – quantification of CO2 mitigation impact in both Annex B and non-Annex B countries-," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 286-295.
    11. Joel A. Rosado Anastacio, 2018. "Usando el método de control sintético para analizar la efectividad del Protocolo de Kioto para reducir las emisiones de CO2, CH4 y N2O en Espana," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 21(2), pages 341-379.
    12. An, Chao & Zhou, Peng & Ma, Chunbo, 2025. "Regional abatement cost-saving effects of industrial agglomeration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Maamoun, Nada, 2019. "The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-256.
    14. Degirmenci, Tunahan & Yavuz, Hakan, 2024. "Environmental taxes, R&D expenditures and renewable energy consumption in EU countries: Are fiscal instruments effective in the expansion of clean energy?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    15. Almer, Christian & Winkler, Ralph, 2017. "Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 125-151.
    16. Appiah, Michael & Li, Mingxing & Sehrish, Saba & Abaji, Emad Eddin, 2023. "Investigating the connections between innovation, natural resource extraction, and environmental pollution in OECD nations; examining the role of capital formation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Wen, Xiaojie & Yao, Shunbo & Sauer, Johannes, 2022. "Shadow prices and abatement cost of soil erosion in Shaanxi Province, China: Convex expectile regression approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Feng, Yanchao & Yan, Tong & Zhang, Ci & Zhang, Zhenhua & Pan, Yuxi, 2025. "Assessing the internal nexus of energy transition at the global level: Insights from triple aspects of scale, structure, and efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    19. Destek, Mehmet Akif, 2019. "Investigation on the role of economic, social and political globalization on environment: Evidence from CEECs," MPRA Paper 106937, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Philip Kerner & Torben Klarl & Tobias Wendler, 2021. "Green Technologies, Environmental Policy and Regional Growth," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2104, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:321:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225011570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.