IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v83y2015icp1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding technological progress and input price as drivers of energy demand in manufacturing industries in India

Author

Listed:
  • Dasgupta, Shyamasree
  • Roy, Joyashree

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of energy demand behaviour of seven energy intensive manufacturing industries and the aggregate manufacturing sector in India during 1973–74 to 2011–12. The policy Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) has mandated energy efficiency targets for these manufacturing industries in India. We focus on two major drivers of energy demand: technological progress and energy price. Productivity growth accounting and estimation of parametric cost function using Annual Survey of Industry data bring out important implications regarding the role of these two drivers. Results suggest that these industries experienced technological progress over the study period (1973–74 to 2011–12) with significant energy-saving bias during 1998–99 to 2011–12. Increase in energy price has led to reduction in energy demand and augmented technological progress in most of the industries. Energy and material inputs are mostly substitutes. During 1998–99 to 2011–12, productivity growth of energy input was induced by both technological progress and increase in energy price. Estimates of inter-factor substitution suggest that price induced reduction in energy demand can be a capital-intensive process in case of some industries. Rebound effect has never taken back full gains of energy efficiency policies in the context of these industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Dasgupta, Shyamasree & Roy, Joyashree, 2015. "Understanding technological progress and input price as drivers of energy demand in manufacturing industries in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151500138X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B.N.Goldar, 2004. "Productivity trends in Indian manufacturing in the pre- and post- reform periods," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 137, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    2. Kim, Bong Chin & Labys, Walter C., 1988. "Application of the translog model of energy substitution to developing countries : The case of Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 313-323, October.
    3. Ernst R. Berndt & Jack E. Triplett, 1991. "Introduction to "Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth"," NBER Chapters, in: Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, pages 1-2, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Bentzen, Jan, 2004. "Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 123-134, January.
    5. Roy, Joyashree, 2000. "The rebound effect: some empirical evidence from India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6-7), pages 433-438, June.
    6. Kevin J. Stiroh, 2001. "What drives productivity growth?," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Mar, pages 37-59.
    7. Charles Blackorby & R. Robert Russell, 1976. "Functional Structure and the Allen Partial Elasticities of Substitution: An Application of Duality Theory," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 43(2), pages 285-291.
    8. Sahu, Santosh & Narayanan, K, 2010. "Determinants of Energy Intensity in Indian Manufacturing Industries: A Firm Level Analysis," MPRA Paper 21646, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Joyashree Roy & Jayant Sathaye & Alan Sanstad & Puran Mongia & Katja Schumacher, 1999. "Productivity Trends in India's Energy Intensive Industries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 33-61.
    10. Dale W. Jorgenson, 1991. "Productivity and Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, pages 19-118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Uri, Noel D., 1979. "Energy demand and interfuel substitution in India," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 181-190, April.
    12. Ethridge, Don, 1973. "The Inclusion of Wastes in the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(6), pages 1430-1441, Nov.-Dec..
    13. Berndt, Ernst R & Wood, David O, 1979. "Engineering and Econometric Interpretations of Energy-Capital Complementarity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(3), pages 342-354, June.
    14. Mongia, Puran & Schumacher, Katja & Sathaye, Jayant, 2001. "Policy reforms and productivity growth in India's energy intensive industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 715-724, July.
    15. Bishwanath Goldar, 2010. "Energy Intensity of Indian Manufacturing Firms: Effect of Energy Prices, Technology and Firm Characteristics," Working Papers id:2483, eSocialSciences.
    16. Sanstad, Alan H. & Roy, Joyashree & Sathaye, Jayant A., 2006. "Estimating energy-augmenting technological change in developing country industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(5-6), pages 720-729, November.
    17. Berndt, Ernst R & Wood, David O, 1975. "Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 57(3), pages 259-268, August.
    18. Diewert, W E, 1971. "An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(3), pages 481-507, May-June.
    19. Krishna, Pravin & Mitra, Devashish, 1998. "Trade liberalization, market discipline and productivity growth: new evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 447-462, August.
    20. Ernst R. Berndt & Jack E. Triplett, 1991. "Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number bern91-1, March.
    21. Williams, Martin & Laumas, Prem S, 1981. "The Relation between Energy and Non-Energy Inputs in India's Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 113-122, December.
    22. William W. Hogan & Dale W. Jorgenson, 1991. "Productivity Trends and the Cost of Reducing CO2 Emissions," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 67-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Kumar, Rajesh & Agarwala, Arun, 2016. "Renewable energy technology diffusion model for techno-economics feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1515-1524.
    3. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Drivers for energy consumption: A comparative analysis of China and India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 954-962.
    4. Qiang Du & Yi Li & Libiao Bai, 2017. "The Energy Rebound Effect for the Construction Industry: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Oak, Hena & Bansal, Sangeeta, 2022. "Enhancing energy efficiency of Indian industries: Effectiveness of PAT scheme," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Li, Zhen & Wu, Baijun & Wang, Danyang & Tang, Maogang, 2022. "Government mandatory energy-biased technological progress and enterprises' environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of cleaner production standards in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Verma, Om Prakash & Manik, Gaurav & Sethi, Sushant Kumar, 2019. "A comprehensive review of renewable energy source on energy optimization of black liquor in MSE using steady and dynamic state modeling, simulation and control," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 90-109.
    8. Assi, Ala Fathi & Zhakanova Isiksal, Aliya & Tursoy, Turgut, 2021. "Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN + 3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 689-700.
    9. Li, Ke & Jiang, Zhujun, 2016. "The impacts of removing energy subsidies on economy-wide rebound effects in China: An input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-72.
    10. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Peng, Hua-Rong & Su, Bin, 2017. "Energy rebound effect in China's Industry: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 199-208.
    11. Li, Ke & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Yanchu, 2016. "The energy rebound effects across China’s industrial sectors: An output distance function approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1165-1175.
    12. Chen, Yufen & Liu, Yanni, 2021. "How biased technological progress sustainably improve the energy efficiency: An empirical research of manufacturing industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Idoko Ahmed Itodo & Shahrzad Safaeimanesh & Festus Victor Bekun, 2017. "Energy Use and Growth of Manufacturing Sector: Evidence from Turkey," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 88-96, March.
    14. Prantik Bagchi & Santosh Kumar Sahu, 2020. "Energy Intensity, Productivity and Pollution Loads: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing Sector of India," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 8(2), pages 194-211, December.
    15. Yongchun Huang & Chengmeng Chen & Dejin Su & Shangshuo Wu, 2020. "Comparison of leading‐industrialisation and crossing‐industrialisation economic growth patterns in the context of sustainable development: Lessons from China and India," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1077-1085, September.
    16. Hu, Changshuai & Du, Dan & Huang, Junbing, 2023. "The driving effect of energy demand evolution: From the perspective of heterogeneity in technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    17. Chen, Yu & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "How does infrastructure affect energy services?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    18. Rissman, Jeffrey & Bataille, Chris & Masanet, Eric & Aden, Nate & Morrow, William R. & Zhou, Nan & Elliott, Neal & Dell, Rebecca & Heeren, Niko & Huckestein, Brigitta & Cresko, Joe & Miller, Sabbie A., 2020. "Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    19. Juan Qian & Ruibing Ji, 2022. "Impact of Energy-Biased Technological Progress on Inclusive Green Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Assaad Ghazouani & Wanjun Xia & Mehdi Ben Jebli & Umer Shahzad, 2020. "Exploring the Role of Carbon Taxation Policies on CO 2 Emissions: Contextual Evidence from Tax Implementation and Non-Implementation European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manish Gupta & Ramprasad Sengupta, 2013. "Energy Savings Potential and Policy for Energy Conservation in Selected Indian Manufacturing Industries," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 5(3), pages 363-388, December.
    2. Koetse, Mark J. & de Groot, Henri L.F. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2008. "Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta-analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2236-2251, September.
    3. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xiying & Nguyen, Tue Anh, 2018. "Evaluating the economic impacts and feasibility of China's energy cap: Based on an Analytic General Equilibrium Model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 114-126.
    4. Arora, Vipin, 2016. "Aggregate Productivity under an Energy-Based Approach," EconStor Research Reports 126146, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Woo, C.K. & Liu, Y. & Zarnikau, J. & Shiu, A. & Luo, X. & Kahrl, F., 2018. "Price elasticities of retail energy demands in the United States: New evidence from a panel of monthly data for 2001–2016," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 460-474.
    6. Peter Graeff & Gert Svendsen, 2013. "Trust and corruption: The influence of positive and negative social capital on the economic development in the European Union," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2829-2846, August.
    7. David I. Stern, 2010. "The Role of Energy in Economic Growth," CCEP Working Papers 0310, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. He, Yongda & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Heterogeneity and asymmetric effects in energy resources allocation of the manufacturing sectors in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1019-1035.
    9. David Clive Broadstock, 2010. "Non-linear technological progress and the substitutability of energy for capital: An application using the translog cost function," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(1), pages 84-93.
    10. Steve Sorrell, 2014. "Energy Substitution, Technical Change and Rebound Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Frondel, Manuel & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2004. "Facing the truth about separability: nothing works without energy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3-4), pages 217-223, December.
    12. Mufutau Opeyemi, Bello, 2021. "Path to sustainable energy consumption: The possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Dunbar, Geoffrey R., 2013. "The Family and Medical Leave Act and the labor productivity of parents," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 334-336.
    14. Ewis, Nabil A., 1983. "A Neoclassical Analysis of the Demand for Cereals in Egypt," Working Papers 243426, University of California, Davis, Agricultural Development Systems: Egypt Project.
    15. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2010. "Modelling energy demand of developing countries: Are the specific features adequately captured?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1979-1990, April.
    16. Michelle Turnovsk & Michael Folie & Alistair Ulph, 1982. "Factor Substitutability in Australian Manufacturing with Emphasis on Energy Inputs," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 58(1), pages 61-72, March.
    17. Strobel, Thomas, 2016. "ICT intermediates and productivity spillovers—Evidence from German and US manufacturing sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 147-163.
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Li, Jianglong, 2014. "The rebound effect for heavy industry: Empirical evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 589-599.
    19. Miguel Martín-Retortillo & Vicente Pinilla, 2013. "Patterns and causes of growth of European agricultural production, 1950-2005," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 1302, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
    20. Kim, Jihyo & Heo, Eunnyeong, 2013. "Asymmetric substitutability between energy and capital: Evidence from the manufacturing sectors in 10 OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 81-89.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.