IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v203y2025ics0301421525001375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do high power prices slow electrification? Some panel data evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Huntington, Hillard

Abstract

Electrifying household and economic activity remain a cornerstone of the transition towards deep decarbonization. This analysis conducts a cross-country evaluation through a pooled mean-group model based upon 33 OECD nations since 1980. Electrification is defined as electricity's share of the total energy system. The results show that electrification would have decreased by approximately 13–31 percent below other countries if the electricity price level had increased above other countries by 100 percent. Additional sensitivities show that symmetry between this response between price increases and price decreases depends upon whether GDP is exogenous. These estimates highlight the critical importance of finding new generation, transmission and distribution technologies that both reduce emissions and remain cost competitive. They also emphasize that any successful transition pathway must price electric power competitively based upon the opportunity costs of providing power. Efforts to bundle costly social programs and other expenses into power prices should be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Huntington, Hillard, 2025. "Do high power prices slow electrification? Some panel data evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001375
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001375
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.