IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v145y2025ics0140988325002683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal policy packages under policy and preference heterogeneities to address climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Jia, Zhijie
  • Liu, Yu
  • Wu, Rongxin
  • Wen, Shiyan
  • Zhang, Hongzhi
  • Lin, Boqiang

Abstract

Policies addressing climate change have undergone extensive research; however, the existing literature lacks a comprehensive evaluation of climate policy packages. The “curse of dimensionality” renders it challenging for researchers to concurrently scrutinize policies across multiple dimensions and diverse government preferences. This study introduces a comprehensive assessment framework to address this issue. It considers the heterogeneity associated with five categories comprising 27 policies, constituting a climate policy package, and the heterogeneity related to six government preferences. The study identifies characteristics of the optimal policy package under preference heterogeneity: e.g., in cases where the government prefers addressing climate change, robust implementation of carbon pricing tools and energy subsidies is recommended, alongside moderately reductions in individual income taxes and increases in agricultural subsidies to alleviate economic and social welfare losses. For moderate governments, moderate adoption of carbon pricing measures, coupled with a reduction in energy tax rates, is suggested to mitigate adverse impacts on industries. For other preferences, alternative strategies are also be provided. This study offers robust decision support for global policymakers, assisting them in making optimal strategy under diverse preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia, Zhijie & Liu, Yu & Wu, Rongxin & Wen, Shiyan & Zhang, Hongzhi & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Optimal policy packages under policy and preference heterogeneities to address climate change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:145:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002683
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoci, Angelo & Borghesi, Simone & Iannucci, Gianluca & Sodini, Mauro, 2021. "Should I stay or should I go? Carbon leakage and ETS in an evolutionary model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Lea Berrang-Ford & Robbert Biesbroek & James D. Ford & Alexandra Lesnikowski & Andrew Tanabe & Frances M. Wang & Chen Chen & Angel Hsu & Jessica J. Hellmann & Patrick Pringle & Martina Grecequet & J.-, 2019. "Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 440-449, June.
    3. Mathijs Harmsen & Charlotte Tabak & Lena Höglund-Isaksson & Florian Humpenöder & Pallav Purohit & Detlef Vuuren, 2023. "Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Fang, Guochang & Tian, Lixin & Fu, Min & Sun, Mei, 2013. "The impacts of carbon tax on energy intensity and economic growth – A dynamic evolution analysis on the case of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 17-28.
    5. Stephie Fried, 2018. "Climate Policy and Innovation: A Quantitative Macroeconomic Analysis," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 90-118, January.
    6. Frederick van der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2015. "Global Warming and the Green Paradox: A Review of Adverse Effects of Climate Policies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 285-303.
    7. den Elzen, Michel & Kuramochi, Takeshi & Höhne, Niklas & Cantzler, Jasmin & Esmeijer, Kendall & Fekete, Hanna & Fransen, Taryn & Keramidas, Kimon & Roelfsema, Mark & Sha, Fu & van Soest, Heleen & Vand, 2019. "Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 238-250.
    8. Jianxiao Wang & Haiwang Zhong & Zhifang Yang & Mu Wang & Daniel M. Kammen & Zhu Liu & Ziming Ma & Qing Xia & Chongqing Kang, 2020. "Exploring the trade-offs between electric heating policy and carbon mitigation in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Maria Beger & Jennifer McGowan & Eric A. Treml & Alison L. Green & Alan T. White & Nicholas H. Wolff & Carissa J. Klein & Peter J. Mumby & Hugh P. Possingham, 2015. "Integrating regional conservation priorities for multiple objectives into national policy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, November.
    10. Bowei Guo and David Newbery, 2023. "The Cost of Carbon Leakage: Britain's Carbon Price Support and Cross-border Electricity Trade," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    11. Barragán-Beaud, Camila & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Xylia, Maria & Syri, Sanna & Silveira, Semida, 2018. "Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 287-299.
    12. Vandyck, Toon & Weitzel, Matthias & Wojtowicz, Krzysztof & Rey Los Santos, Luis & Maftei, Anamaria & Riscado, Sara, 2021. "Climate policy design, competitiveness and income distribution: A macro-micro assessment for 11 EU countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Robert O. Keohane & David G. Victor, 2016. "Cooperation and discord in global climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 570-575, June.
    14. He, Ling-Yun & Chen, Kun-Xian, 2023. "Does China's regional emission trading scheme lead to carbon leakage? Evidence from conglomerates," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Zhang, Kun & Xue, Mei-Mei & Feng, Kuishuang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2019. "The economic effects of carbon tax on China’s provinces," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 784-802.
    16. Jia, Zhijie & Liu, Yu & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "The impossible triangle of carbon mitigation policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Fragkiadakis, Kostas & Sovacool, Benjamin & Paroussos, Leonidas & Vrontisi, Zoi & Charalampidis, Ioannis, 2021. "Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    18. Maamoun, Nada, 2019. "The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-256.
    19. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "CEEEA2.0 model: A dynamic CGE model for energy-environment-economy analysis with available data and code," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Carlo Carraro, Emanuele Massetti, Lea Nicita, 2009. "How Does Climate Policy Affect Technical Change? An Analysis of the Direction and Pace of Technical Progress in a Climate-Economy Model," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    21. Guo, Zhengquan & Zhang, Xingping & Zheng, Yuhua & Rao, Rao, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 455-462.
    22. Gao, Yuning & Li, Meng & Xue, Jinjun & Liu, Yu, 2020. "Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    23. Wang, Siquan & Du, Anna Min & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Micro-mechanisms of digitalization-driven financing for renewable energy: Growing capital pools and shifting flows," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    24. James Rising & Marco Tedesco & Franziska Piontek & David A. Stainforth, 2022. "The missing risks of climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 643-651, October.
    25. Christoph Böhringer & Carolyn Fischer & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Thomas Fox Rutherford, 2022. "Author Correction: Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(4), pages 408-408, April.
    26. Boqiang Lin & Zhijie Jia, 2020. "Supply control vs. demand control: why is resource tax more effective than carbon tax in reducing emissions?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    27. Wang, Siquan & Du, Anna Min & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Market mechanisms for energy transition: Fossil energy price shocks and irrational renewable energy financing," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    28. Jessica Jewell & Vadim Vinichenko & David McCollum & Nico Bauer & Keywan Riahi & Tino Aboumahboub & Oliver Fricko & Mathijs Harmsen & Tom Kober & Volker Krey & Giacomo Marangoni & Massimo Tavoni & Det, 2016. "Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(6), pages 1-9, June.
    29. Orlov, Anton & Aaheim, Asbjørn, 2017. "Economy-wide effects of international and Russia's climate policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 466-477.
    30. Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Steckel & Stephan Klasen & Jann Lay & Nicole Grunewald & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Sebastian Renner & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2014. "Feasible mitigation actions in developing countries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 961-968, November.
    31. Joeri Rogelj & Oliver Fricko & Malte Meinshausen & Volker Krey & Johanna J. J. Zilliacus & Keywan Riahi, 2017. "Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, August.
    32. Tu, Qiang & Betz, Regina & Mo, Jianlei & Fan, Ying, 2019. "The profitability of onshore wind and solar PV power projects in China - A comparative study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 404-417.
    33. Wang, Yizhong & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei, 2022. "Joint or separate? An economic-environmental comparison of energy-consuming and carbon emissions permits trading in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    34. Edward B. Barbier, 2023. "Three climate policies that the G7 must adopt — for itself and the wider world," Nature, Nature, vol. 617(7961), pages 459-461, May.
    35. Bowei Guo & Newbery David, 2023. "The Cost of Carbon Leakage: Britain’s Carbon Price Support and Cross-border Electricity Trade," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(1), pages 9-32, January.
    36. Bednar-Friedl, Birgit & Schinko, Thomas & Steininger, Karl W., 2012. "The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S2), pages 168-180.
    37. Fischer, Carolyn & Fox, Alan K., 2012. "Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 199-216.
    38. Kompas, Tom & Van Ha, Pham, 2019. "The ‘curse of dimensionality’ resolved: The effects of climate change and trade barriers in large dimensional modelling," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 103-110.
    39. Shilong Piao & Philippe Ciais & Yao Huang & Zehao Shen & Shushi Peng & Junsheng Li & Liping Zhou & Hongyan Liu & Yuecun Ma & Yihui Ding & Pierre Friedlingstein & Chunzhen Liu & Kun Tan & Yongqiang Yu , 2010. "The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7311), pages 43-51, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua, Jiawen & Wang, Kai & Lin, Jun & Qian, Yanjun, 2024. "Carbon Tax vs. Carbon Cap-and-Trade: Implementation of carbon border tax in cross-regional production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Huang, Ying & Fang, Kai & Liu, Gengyuan & Guo, Sujian, 2025. "Has the carbon emission trading scheme induced investment leakage in China? Firm-level evidence from China's stock market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Lewis C. King & Jeroen C. J. M. Bergh, 2021. "Potential carbon leakage under the Paris Agreement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Jia, Zhijie & Wu, Rongxin & Liu, Yu & Wen, Shiyan & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Can carbon tariffs based on domestic embedded carbon emissions reduce more carbon leakages?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Jia, Zhijie & Liu, Yu & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "The impossible triangle of carbon mitigation policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Misch, Florian & Wingender, Philippe, 2024. "Revisiting carbon leakage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Xu, Qi & Liu, Kui, 2024. "Hero or Devil: A comparison of different carbon tax policies for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    8. Hua, Jiawen & Lin, Jun & Wang, Kai & Qian, Yanjun, 2025. "Levying carbon tariffs considering foreign competition and technology choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Wang, P.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Liu, Y.Y. & Li, Y.F., 2024. "An ecological input-output CGE model for unveiling CO2 emission metabolism under China's dual carbon goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    11. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Kuik, Onno & Paglialunga, Elena, 2016. "Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-259.
    12. Ren, Xiaohang & An, Yaning & Jin, Chenglu & Yan, Cheng, 2024. "Weathering the policy storm: How climate strategy volatility shapes corporate total factor productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Branger, Frédéric & Quirion, Philippe, 2014. "Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-39.
    14. Fan, Dian & Chen, Shaoqing, 2024. "No pain, no gain? Simulation of carbon reduction potential and socioeconomic effects of voluntary carbon trading in China during 2021–2060," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    15. Bellora, Cecilia, 2020. "Carbon Border Adjustment and Alternatives," Conference papers 333210, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Pan, Wenqi & Kim, Man-Keun & Ning, Zhuo & Yang, Hongqiang, 2020. "Carbon leakage in energy/forest sectors and climate policy implications using meta-analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Adrien Bilal & James H. Stock, 2025. "A Guide to Macroeconomics and Climate Change," NBER Working Papers 33567, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Zhang, Yue & Zhao, Xin-gang & Zhou, Ying & Wang, Hui, 2025. "Impact of combined environmental policies on carbon emission reduction: A system dynamics analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Marc Baudry & Alienor Cameron, 2022. "The case for a Carbon Border Adjustment: Where do economists stand?," Working Papers hal-04159819, HAL.
    20. Ning Yan & Shenhai Huang & Yan Chen & Daini Zhang & Qin Xu & Xiangyi Yang & Shiyan Wen, 2025. "Co-Benefits of Carbon Pricing and Electricity Market Liberalization: A CGE Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:145:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.