Author
Listed:
- Joeri Rogelj
(ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science)
- Oliver Fricko
(ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))
- Malte Meinshausen
(Australian-German College of Climate & Energy Transitions, The University of Melbourne
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK))
- Volker Krey
(ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))
- Johanna J. J. Zilliacus
(ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))
- Keywan Riahi
(ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Graz University of Technology)
Abstract
The UN Paris Agreement puts in place a legally binding mechanism to increase mitigation action over time. Countries put forward pledges called nationally determined contributions (NDC) whose impact is assessed in global stocktaking exercises. Subsequently, actions can then be strengthened in light of the Paris climate objective: limiting global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C and pursuing efforts to limit it further to 1.5 °C. However, pledged actions are currently described ambiguously and this complicates the global stocktaking exercise. Here, we systematically explore possible interpretations of NDC assumptions, and show that this results in estimated emissions for 2030 ranging from 47 to 63 GtCO2e yr−1. We show that this uncertainty has critical implications for the feasibility and cost to limit warming well below 2 °C and further to 1.5 °C. Countries are currently working towards clarifying the modalities of future NDCs. We identify salient avenues to reduce the overall uncertainty by about 10 percentage points through simple, technical clarifications regarding energy accounting rules. Remaining uncertainties depend to a large extent on politically valid choices about how NDCs are expressed, and therefore raise the importance of a thorough and robust process that keeps track of where emissions are heading over time.
Suggested Citation
Joeri Rogelj & Oliver Fricko & Malte Meinshausen & Volker Krey & Johanna J. J. Zilliacus & Keywan Riahi, 2017.
"Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms15748
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15748
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms15748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.