IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_ncomms15748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Joeri Rogelj

    (ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
    Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science)

  • Oliver Fricko

    (ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))

  • Malte Meinshausen

    (Australian-German College of Climate & Energy Transitions, The University of Melbourne
    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK))

  • Volker Krey

    (ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))

  • Johanna J. J. Zilliacus

    (ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA))

  • Keywan Riahi

    (ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
    Graz University of Technology)

Abstract

The UN Paris Agreement puts in place a legally binding mechanism to increase mitigation action over time. Countries put forward pledges called nationally determined contributions (NDC) whose impact is assessed in global stocktaking exercises. Subsequently, actions can then be strengthened in light of the Paris climate objective: limiting global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C and pursuing efforts to limit it further to 1.5 °C. However, pledged actions are currently described ambiguously and this complicates the global stocktaking exercise. Here, we systematically explore possible interpretations of NDC assumptions, and show that this results in estimated emissions for 2030 ranging from 47 to 63 GtCO2e yr−1. We show that this uncertainty has critical implications for the feasibility and cost to limit warming well below 2 °C and further to 1.5 °C. Countries are currently working towards clarifying the modalities of future NDCs. We identify salient avenues to reduce the overall uncertainty by about 10 percentage points through simple, technical clarifications regarding energy accounting rules. Remaining uncertainties depend to a large extent on politically valid choices about how NDCs are expressed, and therefore raise the importance of a thorough and robust process that keeps track of where emissions are heading over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Joeri Rogelj & Oliver Fricko & Malte Meinshausen & Volker Krey & Johanna J. J. Zilliacus & Keywan Riahi, 2017. "Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms15748
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15748
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms15748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luís M. Fazendeiro & Sofia G. Simões, 2021. "Historical Variation of IEA Energy and CO 2 Emission Projections: Implications for Future Energy Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Hélène Benveniste & Olivier Boucher & Céline Guivarch & Hervé Le Treut & Patrick Criqui, 2018. "Impacts of nationally determined contributions on 2030 global greenhouse gas emissions: uncertainty analysis and distribution of emissions," Post-Print hal-01662799, HAL.
    3. den Elzen, Michel & Kuramochi, Takeshi & Höhne, Niklas & Cantzler, Jasmin & Esmeijer, Kendall & Fekete, Hanna & Fransen, Taryn & Keramidas, Kimon & Roelfsema, Mark & Sha, Fu & van Soest, Heleen & Vand, 2019. "Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 238-250.
    4. Salman, Muhammad & Long, Xingle & Wang, Guimei & Zha, Donglan, 2022. "Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Jiancheng Qin & Hui Tao & Chinhsien Cheng & Karthikeyan Brindha & Minjin Zhan & Jianli Ding & Guijin Mu, 2020. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Carbon Emissions in the Energy Base, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Wachsmuth, Jakob & Schaeffer, Michiel & Hare, Bill, 2018. "The EU long-term strategy to reduce GHG emissions in light of the Paris Agreement and the IPCC Special Report on 1,5°C," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S22/2018, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Xinhao Hu & Zhongbin Zhang & Dandan Cai, 2020. "A Mathematical Tightening of Instantaneous Indoor and Outdoor Dry-Bulb and Wet-Bulb Temperature Tolerances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. M.J. Mace & Claire L. Fyson & Michiel Schaeffer & William L. Hare, 2021. "Large‐Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal to Meet the 1.5°C Limit: Key Governance Gaps, Challenges and Priority Responses," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 67-81, April.
    9. Yang, Jun & Hao, Yun & Feng, Chao, 2021. "A race between economic growth and carbon emissions: What play important roles towards global low-carbon development?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Sferra, Fabio & Krapp, Mario & Roming, Niklas & Schaeffer, Michiel & Malik, Aman & Hare, Bill & Brecha, Robert, 2019. "Towards optimal 1.5° and 2 °C emission pathways for individual countries: A Finland case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Thorstensen, Vera & Hernandez, Ariel Macaspac & de Oliveira Corrêa, Rogerio & Teixeira de Brito, Dolores & Arima Júnior, Mauro Kiithi & Mota, Catherine Rebouças & Megale, Tiago Matsuoka & Zuchieri, Am, 2024. "Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) and the "greening" of high-emitting industry sectors in Brazil: Mapping the sustainability efforts of the private sector," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2024, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Yuhe Ji & Guangsheng Zhou & Qijin He & Lixia Wang, 2018. "The Effect of Climate Change on Spring Maize ( Zea mays L.) Suitability across China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    13. Timilsina, Raja R & Kotani, Koji & Nakagawa, Yoshinori & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, 2021. "Concerns for future generations in societies: A deliberative analysis of the intergenerational sustainability dilemma," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Marcucci, Adriana & Panos, Evangelos & Kypreos, Socrates & Fragkos, Panagiotis, 2019. "Probabilistic assessment of realizing the 1.5 °C climate target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 239-251.
    15. Marian Leimbach & Anastasis Giannousakis, 2019. "Burden sharing of climate change mitigation: global and regional challenges under shared socio-economic pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 273-291, July.
    16. Daniel Puig & Fatemeh Bakhtiari, 2019. "Incorporating uncertainty in national-level climate change-mitigation policy: possible elements for a research agenda," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 86-89, March.
    17. Håkon Sælen, 2020. "Under What Conditions Will the Paris Process Produce a Cycle of Increasing Ambition Sufficient to Reach the 2°C Goal?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(2), pages 83-104, May.
    18. Marian Leimbach & Nico Bauer, 2022. "Capital markets and the costs of climate policies," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(3), pages 397-420, July.
    19. Motlaghzadeh, Kasra & Schweizer, Vanessa & Craik, Neil & Moreno-Cruz, Juan, 2023. "Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms15748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.