IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v365y2024ics0306261924006603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ecological input-output CGE model for unveiling CO2 emission metabolism under China's dual carbon goals

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, P.P.
  • Huang, G.H.
  • Li, Y.P.
  • Liu, Y.Y.
  • Li, Y.F.

Abstract

Carbon mitigation is essential for combating climate change and its impacts, safeguarding ecosystems, and protecting human health and livelihoods. This study develops an ecological input-output CGE (EIOC) model that integrates computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, input-output analysis (IOA), and ecological network analysis (ENA) to explore the evolution of the CO2 emission metabolism under long-term carbon tax policies. The EIOC model excels not only in intimately depicting economic relationships and evaluating the economic impacts of policy interventions but also in unveiling the complex internal interactions within the context of emission dynamics through multidimensional network perspectives. The EIOC model is employed to analyze CO2 emission flows under carbon tax policies aimed at fulfilling China's dual carbon goals, thereby validating its applicability. It is found that (i) the implementation of carbon tax policies (P25 and P30 scenarios) would lead to economic decline; however, there would emerge potential for recovery in investment and international trade; (ii) adopting an earlier carbon peak target (P25 scenario) would yield more pronounced emission reductions in the early to mid-term (in 2035, reductions in steel, construction, and manufacturing sectors would exceed those under the P30 scenario by 15.74%, 11.89%, and 11.59% respectively); (iii) long-term policies would significantly impact the dynamics of CO2 emission metabolism; chemical sector would display an increased reliance on the system, indicating a heightened need for inputs from the system; transactions exhibiting increased centrality (between chemical and other mining, and between chemical and manufacturing) reveal their elevated significance as transfer pathways of CO2 flows. Identifying significant changes in CO2 emission metabolism can inform incentivizing or constraining measures aimed at further adjusting emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, P.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Liu, Y.Y. & Li, Y.F., 2024. "An ecological input-output CGE model for unveiling CO2 emission metabolism under China's dual carbon goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924006603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924006603
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mardones, Cristian & Ortega, José, 2021. "Are the emissions trading systems’ simulations generated with a computable general equilibrium model sensitive to the nested production structure?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Apoorva Gurtu & Vidhisha Vyas & Amulya Gurtu, 2022. "Emissions Reduction Policies and Their Effects on Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Mohammed Basheer & Victor Nechifor & Alvaro Calzadilla & Claudia Ringler & David Hulme & Julien J. Harou, 2022. "Balancing national economic policy outcomes for sustainable development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Clora, Francesco & Yu, Wusheng, 2022. "GHG emissions, trade balance, and carbon leakage: Insights from modeling thirty-one European decarbonization pathways towards 2050," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Fang, Delin & Chen, Bin, 2019. "Information-based ecological network analysis for carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 45-53.
    6. Lin, Zewei & Wang, Peng & Ren, Songyan & Zhao, Daiqing, 2023. "Economic and environmental impacts of EVs promotion under the 2060 carbon neutrality target—A CGE based study in Shaanxi Province of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    7. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "CEEEA2.0 model: A dynamic CGE model for energy-environment-economy analysis with available data and code," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Zhai, Mengyu & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Zheng, Boyue & Guan, Yuru, 2020. "Inter-regional carbon flows embodied in electricity transmission: network simulation for energy-carbon nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Zhang, Yan & Li, Yaoguang & Hubacek, Klaus & Tian, Xin & Lu, Zhongming, 2019. "Analysis of CO2 transfer processes involved in global trade based on ecological network analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 576-583.
    10. Roberto Basile & Pasquale Commendatore & Ingrid Kubin, 2021. "Complex spatial economic systems: migration, industrial location and regional asymmetries," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, January.
    11. Guo, Zhengquan & Zhang, Xingping & Zheng, Yuhua & Rao, Rao, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 455-462.
    12. Li, Jizhe & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong, 2018. "Ecological network analysis for urban metabolism and carbon emissions based on input-output tables: A case study of Guangdong province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 383(C), pages 118-126.
    13. Younes Ahmadi & Akio Yamazaki & Philippe Kabore, 2022. "How Do Carbon Taxes Affect Emissions? Plant-Level Evidence from Manufacturing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(2), pages 285-325, June.
    14. Wang, Meng & Yu, Hang & Yang, Yikun & Lin, Xiaoyu & Guo, Haijin & Li, Chaoen & Zhou, Yue & Jing, Rui, 2021. "Unlocking emerging impacts of carbon tax on integrated energy systems through supply and demand co-optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Na & Yao, Xilong & Wan, Fang & Han, Yunfei, 2023. "Are tax revenue recycling schemes based on industry-differentiated carbon tax conducive to realizing the “double dividend”?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Gao, Zhiyuan & Zhao, Ying & Li, Lianqing & Hao, Yu, 2024. "Economic effects of sustainable energy technology progress under carbon reduction targets: An analysis based on a dynamic multi-regional CGE model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    3. Chen, Dongxu & Huang, Yin & Tan, Nairong & Hong, Tao & Ma, Tao, 2024. "Cross-regional economic impact of carbon emission regulations: A quantitative spatial equilibrium model for China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 438-462.
    4. Zhai, Mengyu & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Guo, Zhengquan & Su, Shuai, 2021. "Segmented carbon tax may significantly affect the regional and national economy and environment-a CGE-based analysis for Guangdong Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Li, Jizhe & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Yongping & Zhai, Mengyu & Xu, Xinli, 2021. "Projections of carbon metabolism in 2035 and implications for demand-side controls under various scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Mazen A. Al-Sinan & Abdulaziz A. Bubshait & Fatimah Alamri, 2023. "Saudi Arabia’s Journey toward Net-Zero Emissions: Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Niu, Tong & Yao, Xilong & Shao, Shuai & Li, Ding & Wang, Wenxi, 2018. "Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: An estimated DSGE model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 9-17.
    8. Tan, Xiujie & Sun, Qian & Wang, Meiji & Se Cheong, Tsun & Yan Shum, Wai & Huang, Jinpeng, 2022. "Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    9. Christos Ap. LADIAS & Filipos RUXHO & Fernando Jos? Calado e Silva Nunes TEIXEIRA & Susana Soares Pinheiro Vieira PESCADA, 2023. "The Regional Economic Indicators And Economic Development Of Kosovo," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 73-83, June.
    10. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Mohammed Basheer & Victor Nechifor & Alvaro Calzadilla & Solomon Gebrechorkos & David Pritchard & Nathan Forsythe & Jose M. Gonzalez & Justin Sheffield & Hayley J. Fowler & Julien J. Harou, 2023. "Cooperative adaptive management of the Nile River with climate and socio-economic uncertainties," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 48-57, January.
    12. Mardones, Cristian & Flores, Belén, 2018. "Effectiveness of a CO2 tax on industrial emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 370-382.
    13. Li, Aihong & Li, Shuyan & Chen, Shuai & Sun, Xiaoqin, 2024. "The role of Fintech, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption in Shaping environmental sustainability in China: A NARDL perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Huang, Charley Z. & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2019. "Integrated GHG emissions and emission relationships analysis through a disaggregated ecologically-extended input-output model; A case study for Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 97-109.
    15. Kwang Il Kim, 2019. "Investigation of Japanese electricity industry using a CGE model of translog function," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Wei, Weixian & Zhao, Yurong & Wang, Jianlin & Song, Malin, 2019. "The environmental benefits and economic impacts of Fit-in-Tariff in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 401-410.
    17. Yao Wang & Qiang Yang & Xuenan Wu & Ruichen Wang & Tilei Gao & Yuntong Liu, 2023. "A Study of Trends in Low-Energy Development Patterns in China: A Data-Driven Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Cui, Lianbiao & Li, Rongjing & Song, Malin & Zhu, Lei, 2019. "Can China achieve its 2030 energy development targets by fulfilling carbon intensity reduction commitments?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 61-73.
    19. Yingbin Zhou & Siqi Lv & Jianlin Wang & Junbo Tong & Zhong Fang, 2022. "The Impact of Green Taxes on the Carbon Emission Efficiency of China’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Steinhauser Dušan & Kittová Zuzana & Khúlová Lucia, 2024. "Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Trade: The Case of the EU," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 41-47, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924006603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.