IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ememar/v65y2025ics1566014124001456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the impact of employee-friendly practices on performance volatility in African banks: A textual analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Adeabah, David
  • Andoh, Charles
  • Mensah, Lord

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between managerial attention to employee-friendly practices (EFPs) and performance volatility in banks. Using data from 30 public banks in four emerging African economies from 2005 to 2021, we utilize a text-based measure of managerial attention to EFPs based on keywords related to employee relations. We decompose performance volatility into inherent and residual components. The findings reveal a positive relationship between managerial attention to EFPs and inherent cashflow and earnings volatility. We also find a negative association of EFPs with residual cashflow volatility and positive association with earnings volatility. In cross-sectional analysis, we find that the positive link between managerial attention to EFPs and cashflow (earnings) volatility is more pronounced in large (small) banks, and in banks with lower levels of capital. Our results suggest that EFPs may encourage prudent liquidity risk management behavior, but greater uncertainty in equity capital levels, potentially weakening the overall soundness of banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeabah, David & Andoh, Charles & Mensah, Lord, 2025. "Examining the impact of employee-friendly practices on performance volatility in African banks: A textual analysis approach," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:65:y:2025:i:c:s1566014124001456
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014124001456
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:65:y:2025:i:c:s1566014124001456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620356 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.