IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v24y2017i18p1294-1297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee treatment and the choice of liquidity: lines of credit versus cash holdings

Author

Listed:
  • Kiyoung Chang
  • Hyeongsop Shim

Abstract

By examining the relation between the employee welfare index and the choice between lines of credit (LC) and cash holdings, we provide empirical findings consistent with monitored liquidity insurance, agency, and tax theories. There is a negative relation between the LC-to-cash ratio and the employee treatment index, which is more pronounced for firms with large intangible assets. Additionally, this negative relation is observed only in low agency firms, which is consistent with the prediction of agency theory of cash holdings. Firms increase LC to meet future investment opportunities rather than increasing cash holdings when their marginal tax rates are high.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiyoung Chang & Hyeongsop Shim, 2017. "Employee treatment and the choice of liquidity: lines of credit versus cash holdings," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(18), pages 1294-1297, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:18:p:1294-1297
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1273478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2016.1273478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2016.1273478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:18:p:1294-1297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.