IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v102y2023i3p589-612.html

Urban crisis vs. urban success in the era of 4.0 technologies: Baumol's model revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Camagni
  • Roberta Capello
  • Camilla Lenzi
  • Giovanni Perucca

Abstract

The advent of 4.0 technologies allows a footloose location for firms and people, apparently suggesting a “flat world.” In this perspective, cities lose their attractiveness and undergo an urban decline. The aim of this paper is to reflect on urban growth opportunities provided by 4.0 technologies, detaching the analysis from a narrative and speculative explanation. The paper revisits the well‐known Baumol model on urban crisis, and all its criticisms and refinements, introducing the adoption of digital technologies in the theoretical reasoning. Expectations arise in favour of a re‐launch of urban economies in a spatial income distribution setting. An econometric analysis on Italian provinces proves the validity of the expectations. La aparición de las tecnologías 4.0 permite una localización sin ataduras de las empresas y las personas, lo que sugiere aparentemente la existencia de un “mundo plano”. Desde esta perspectiva, las ciudades pierden su atractivo y experimentan un declive urbano. El objetivo de este artículo es reflexionar sobre las oportunidades de crecimiento urbano que brindan las tecnologías 4.0, desvinculando el análisis de una explicación narrativa y especulativa. El artículo revisa el conocido modelo de Baumol sobre la crisis urbana, así como todas sus críticas y perfeccionamientos, e introduce la adopción de las tecnologías digitales en el razonamiento teórico. Surgen expectativas a favor de un relanzamiento de las economías urbanas en un contexto de distribución espacial de la renta. Un análisis econométrico sobre las provincias italianas demuestra la validez de las expectativas. 4.0テクノロジーの出現により、企業や人々のフットルースな立地行動が可能となり、これが「フラット化した世界」を示唆しているように考えられる。こうした観点からでは、都市はその魅力を失い、そして衰退を迎えることになる。本稿の目的は、物語的かつ思弁的な説明から分析を切り離し、4.0テクノロジーによって提供される都市の成長機会について熟考することである。本稿では、よく知られた都市危機に関するボーモル(Baumol)モデルと、それに対するすべての批判と改良すべき点を再考し、理論的推論にデジタル技術を採用することを紹介する。空間的な所得分布の設定における都市経済の再生を支持する期待が生じる。イタリアの州の計量経済学的分析から、期待の妥当性が示される。

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi & Giovanni Perucca, 2023. "Urban crisis vs. urban success in the era of 4.0 technologies: Baumol's model revisited," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(3), pages 589-612, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:102:y:2023:i:3:p:589-612
    DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pirs.12729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre‐Philippe Combes & Gilles Duranton & Laurent Gobillon & Diego Puga & Sébastien Roux, 2012. "The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration From Firm Selection," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(6), pages 2543-2594, November.
    2. Oulton, Nicholas, 2001. "Must the Growth Rate Decline? Baumol's Unbalanced Growth Revisited," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 605-627, October.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Timo Boppart & Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2019. "Missing Growth from Creative Destruction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2795-2822, August.
    4. Liu, Sitian & Su, Yichen, 2021. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for density: Evidence from the U.S. housing market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Di Liberto, Adriana & Sideri, Marco, 2015. "Past dominations, current institutions and the Italian regional economic performance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 12-41.
    6. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Giovanni Perucca, 2022. "Beyond productivity slowdown: Quality, pricing and resource reallocation in regional competitiveness," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(6), pages 1307-1330, December.
    7. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2004. "The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(3), pages 526-556, June.
    8. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Duranton, Gilles & Gobillon, Laurent, 2008. "Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters!," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 723-742, March.
    9. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello, 2020. "Contributions by Italian scholars to regional science," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(2), pages 359-388, April.
    10. Gokan, Toshitaka & Kichko, Sergey & Matheson, Jesse & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2022. "How the rise of teleworking will reshape labor markets and cities," CEPR Discussion Papers 17672, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    11. repec:hal:pseose:hal-00812695 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2020. "The Economics of Urban Density," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 3-26, Summer.
    13. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    14. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Michiel Gerritse, 2022. "Continuous vs. Discrete Urban Ranks: Explaining the Evolution in the Italian Urban Hierarchy over Five Decades," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(5), pages 438-463, October.
    15. Nicholas Oulton, 2016. "The Mystery of TFP," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 31, pages 68-87, Fall.
    16. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson & Brendan Price, 2014. "Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 394-399, May.
    17. Rafael Fernandez & Enrique Palazuelos, 2012. "European Union Economies Facing ‘Baumol's Disease’ within the Service Sector," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 231-249, March.
    18. Althoff, Lukas & Eckert, Fabian & Ganapati, Sharat & Walsh, Conor, 2022. "The Geography of Remote Work," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Pavitt, Keith, 1984. "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 343-373, December.
    20. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    21. Ciccone, Antonio, 2002. "Agglomeration effects in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 213-227, February.
    22. Djellal, Faridah & Gallouj, Faïz & Miles, Ian, 2013. "Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 98-117.
    23. Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2014. "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2509-2526, August.
    24. Giovanni Perucca, 2014. "The Role of Territorial Capital in Local Economic Growth: Evidence from Italy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 537-562, March.
    25. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    26. Capello, Roberta & Lenzi, Camilla & Perucca, Giovanni, 2022. "The modern Solow paradox. In search for explanations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 166-180.
    27. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Caragliu & Paolo Landoni, 2024. "Firm cooperation policies: the impact of territorial spillovers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(1), pages 363-396, June.
    2. Roberta Capello & Roberto Dellisanti & Giovanni Perucca, 2024. "At the territorial roots of global processes: Heterogeneous modes of regional involvement in Global Value Chains," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 833-848, May.
    3. Camilla Lenzi & Giovanni Perucca, 2026. "Cities, Inequalities and the Geography of Societal Discontent in European Regions," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 131-147, February.
    4. Roberta Capello & Simona Ciappei & Camilla Lenzi, 2024. "Unveiling the automation—wage inequality nexus within and across regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1729-1756, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koster, Hans R.A. & Ozgen, Ceren, 2021. "Cities and tasks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    3. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    4. Du, Longzheng & Lin, Weifen, 2022. "Does the application of industrial robots overcome the Solow paradox? Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Patrick Bennett & Aline Butikofer & Kjell G. Salvanes & Darina Steskal, 2022. "Changes in Urban Wages, Jobs, and Workers from 1958-2017," Working Papers 202214, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    6. Camilla Lenzi & Elisa Panzera, 2025. "Income and wage inequalities from automation. A European perspective," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(3), pages 395-420, September.
    7. Mario Pianta, 2018. "Technology and Employment: Twelve Stylised Facts for the Digital Age," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 61(2), pages 189-225, June.
    8. Anderton, Robert & Jarvis, Valerie & Labhard, Vincent & Morgan, Julian & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vivian, Lara, 2020. "Virtually everywhere? Digitalisation and the euro area and EU economies," Occasional Paper Series 244, European Central Bank.
    9. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    11. Heyman, Fredrik & Olsson, Martin, 2022. "Long-Run Effects of Technological Change: The Impact of Automation and on Intergenerational Mobility," Working Paper Series 1451, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 12 Dec 2025.
    12. Battisti & M. Del Gatto & A. Gravina & C. Parmeter, 2021. "Robots versus labor skills: a complementarity/substitutability analysis," Working Paper CRENoS 202104, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    13. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    14. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence, Income Distribution and Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 13606, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Martin Lábaj & Tomáš Oleš & Gabriel Procházka, 2025. "Impact of robots and artificial intelligence on labor and skill demand: evidence from the UK," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 953-1001, December.
    16. Goos, Maarten & Rademakers, Emilie & Röttger, Ronja, 2021. "Routine-Biased technical change: Individual-Level evidence from a plant closure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    17. Brambilla, Irene & César, Andrés & Falcone, Guillermo & Gasparini, Leonardo, 2023. "The impact of robots in Latin America: Evidence from local labor markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Włoch, Renata & Śledziewska, Katarzyna & Rożynek, Satia, 2025. "Who's afraid of automation? Examining determinants of fear of automation in six European countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    20. Alex Chernoff & Gabriela Galassi, 2023. "Digitalization: Labour Markets," Discussion Papers 2023-16, Bank of Canada.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:102:y:2023:i:3:p:589-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.