IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v69y2025i4p806-819.html

Triggering Ethical Food Choices Through Identity Labelling: Evidence From a Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanna Piracci
  • Elena Radicioni
  • Leonardo Casini
  • Fabio Boncinelli

Abstract

The importance of social and ethical communication as a regulatory instrument to nudge more sustainable consumption patterns is advocated at the European and global policy levels. Little is known about the effectiveness of identity labelling, an innovative form of information provisioning leveraging the individual self‐perception to encourage virtuous behaviours. We conducted a framed field experiment using the Becker‐DeGroot‐Marschak (BDM) mechanism to investigate consumers' responses to social identity labelling, that is, identity labelling hinging upon sensitivity to social issues. This study is the first application to test social identity labelling in an incentive‐compatible food experiment. The results show that overall consumers are indifferent to the presence of social identity labelling, as their willingness to pay for an ethical product does not increase when this information tool is applied. However, environmentally conscious consumers exhibit a premium for products with social identity claims, while social consciousness shows no significant effect. Moreover, the effectiveness of identity labels is not mediated by personality traits conceptualised as the Big Five.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanna Piracci & Elena Radicioni & Leonardo Casini & Fabio Boncinelli, 2025. "Triggering Ethical Food Choices Through Identity Labelling: Evidence From a Field Experiment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(4), pages 806-819, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:4:p:806-819
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70053
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.70053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirotsugu Uchida & Cathy A. Roheim & Hiroki Wakamatsu & Christopher M. Anderson, 2014. "Do Japanese consumers care about sustainable fisheries? Evidence from an auction of ecolabelled seafood," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(2), pages 263-280, April.
    2. Casati, Mirta & Soregaroli, Claudio & Rommel, Jens & Luzzani, Gloria & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2023. "Please keep ordering! A natural field experiment assessing a carbon label introduction," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Grebitus, Carola & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2013. "Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 11-26.
    4. Alina Stankevich, 2017. "Explaining the Consumer Decision-Making Process: Critical Literature Review," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(6), pages 7-14, September.
    5. Pengfei Liu & Xiaohui Tian, 2021. "Downward Hypothetical Bias in the Willingness to Accept Measure for Private Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1679-1699, October.
    6. Machiel J. Reinders & Jos Bartels, 2017. "The roles of identity and brand equity in organic consumption behavior: Private label brands versus national brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 68-85, January.
    7. De Valck, Jeremy & Rolfe, John & Rajapaksa, Darshana & Star, Megan, 2022. "Consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(03), January.
    8. Alicia Entem & Patrick Lloyd‐Smith & Wiktor ( Vic) L. Adamowicz & Peter C. Boxall, 2022. "Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1224-1242, August.
    9. Francesca Gerini & Frode Alfnes & Alexander Schjøll, 2016. "Organic- and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same Consumers?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 471-490, June.
    10. So Young Song & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2018. "Theory of Virtue Ethics: Do Consumers’ Good Traits Predict Their Socially Responsible Consumption?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1159-1175, November.
    11. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Wine consumers' demand for social sustainability labeling: Evidence for the fair labor claim," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1742-1761, December.
    12. Andreas C. Drichoutis & Achilleas Vassilopoulos & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. NaygaJr., 2017. "Consumer preferences for fair labour certification," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(3), pages 455-474.
    13. Ortega, David L. & Sun, Jiayu & Lin, Wen, 2022. "Identity labels as an instrument to reduce meat demand and encourage consumption of plant based and cultured meat alternatives in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Achilleas Vassilopoulos & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2024. "Reference dependence, expectations and anchoring in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 637-683, December.
    15. John A. List, 2003. "Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 41-71.
    16. Flavio Boccia & Rosa Malgeri Manzo & Daniela Covino, 2019. "Consumer behavior and corporate social responsibility: An evaluation by a choice experiment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 97-105, January.
    17. Cristiano Franceschinis & Riccardo Scarpa & Luca Rossetto & Mara Thiene, 2022. "Is local and organic produce less satiating? Some evidence from a field experiment," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(5), pages 1146-1178.
    18. Michael Grimm & Nathalie Luck & Franziska Steinhübel, 2023. "Consumers' willingness to pay for organic rice: Insights from a non‐hypothetical experiment in Indonesia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 83-103, January.
    19. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Klonaris, Stathis & Papoutsi, Georgia S., 2017. "Do Good Things Come in Small Packages? Bottle Size Effects on Willingness to Pay for Pomegranate Wine and Grape Wine," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 84-104, February.
    20. Brianne Eby & Amanda R. Carrico & Heather Barnes Truelove, 2019. "The influence of environmental identity labeling on the uptake of pro-environmental behaviors," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 563-580, August.
    21. Ortega, David L. & Sun, Jiayu & Lin, Wen, 2022. "Identity labels as an instrument to reduce meat demand and encourage consumption of meat alternatives in China," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322089, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    22. Osburg, Victoria-Sophie & Akhtar, Pervaiz & Yoganathan, Vignesh & McLeay, Fraser, 2019. "The influence of contrasting values on consumer receptiveness to ethical information and ethical choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 366-379.
    23. Giovanna Piracci & Emilia Lamonaca & Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2024. "On the willingness to pay for food sustainability labelling: A meta‐analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 329-345, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Rao Yuan & Shaosheng Jin & Lin Zhou & Hsiaoping Chien & Wenchao Wu, 2025. "Promoting eco‐labeled food consumption in China: The role of information," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 401-423, April.
    3. Bazzani, Claudia & Scarpa, Riccardo & Begalli, Diego & Capitello, Roberta, 2025. "Reporting nutritional information on wine packaging: Does it affect consumers’ choices? Evidence from a choice experiment in Italy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Rao Yuan & Zhengmin Tang, 2025. "Does carbon labelling encourage the consumption of low‐emission meat products? Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(1), pages 80-99, January.
    5. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Investigating Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Packaging Through a Different Behavioural Approach: A Random Regret Minimization Application," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Nouve, Yawotse & Zheng, Yuqing & Zhao, Shuoli & Kaiser, Harry M. & Dong, Diansheng, 2024. "A detailed demand analysis of plant-based meat alternatives vs. animal-based meat in the United States," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343798, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Sunil P. Dhoubhadel & William Ridley, 2025. "China's meat sector growth and U.S. grain and oilseed exports," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 275-303, March.
    8. Anne O. Peschel & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John Thøgersen, 2026. "True pricing – guiding consumers within a new pricing paradigm," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Ji Yong Lee & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Cary Deck & Andreas C. Drichoutis, 2020. "Cognitive Ability and Bidding Behavior in Second Price Auctions: An Experimental Study," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1494-1510, October.
    10. Mercy Mwambi & Pepijn Schreinemachers & Naphtal Habiyaremye & Lyda Hok & Uon Bonnarith & Paul Ebner, 2026. "Willingness‐to‐Pay for Safe Vegetables: A Comparative Analysis Between Wet Market and Supermarket Shoppers in Urban Cambodia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(1), pages 222-238, January.
    11. Caterina Contini & Fabio Boncinelli & Giovanna Piracci & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Can blockchain technology strengthen consumer preferences for credence attributes?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Hongsha Wang & Qihui Chen & Bhagyashree Katare, 2023. "Nudging Chinese consumers to embrace sustainable milk consumption: How should information be provided?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1512-1534, December.
    13. Eleonora Sofia Rossi & Luca Cacchiarelli & Simone Severini & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2024. "Consumers preferences and social sustainability: a discrete choice experiment on ‘Quality Agricultural Work’ ethical label in the Italian fruit sector," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Espey, Amelia & Schuenemann, Franziska & Weinrich, Ramona, 2026. "Just another food fad? Expert insights and future scenarios for the plant-based alternative sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Fang, Yingkai & Asche, Frank & Gao, Zhifeng, 2020. "Can ecolabel certifications for restaurants influence consumer choices away from home?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304268, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Stefanella, Stranieri & Mirta, Casati & Claudio, Soregaroli & Alessandro, Varacca, 2025. "Nutriscore’s impact on purchase intention for products with geographical indications: a Bayesian causal mediation analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Lijia Shi & Jing Xie & Zhifeng Gao, 2018. "The impact of deal†proneness on WTP estimates in incentive†aligned value elicitation methods," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 353-362, May.
    18. Moon, DongWhoi & Wang, H. Holly & Hao, Na, 2023. "Consumer behavior in choosing microplastic contaminated seafood across different countries: The role of cultural and attitudinal factors," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 290-306.
    19. Reis, Germano Glufke & Martins da Silva, Beatrice de Freitas & Hartmann, Anna Loraine & Venus, Terese E., 2025. "Promises and uncertainties in the cultivated proteins market: Perspectives from Germany and Brazil," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Cristiano Franceschinis & Riccardo Scarpa & Mara Thiene & Roselinde Kessels, 2025. "Individual preferences for food items within couples: Validating choice experiments predictions with real purchases data," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(1), pages 7-24, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:4:p:806-819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.