IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/emxxdp/em-dp2017-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beliefs, Exams and Social Media: A Study of Girls and Boys in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Della Giusta

    () (Department of Economics, University of Reading)

  • Sarah Jewell

    () (Department of Economics, University of Reading)

  • Danica Vukadinovic Greetham

    (Centre for the Mathematics of Human Behaviour, University of reading)

Abstract

Social media diffusion amongst tween and teenagers keeps increasing year on year and involving younger and younger children and studies have begun to appear indicating several changes in adolescent behaviour and mental health corresponding with increased social media use (Twenge, 2017; Twenge et al., 2017). Data derived from social media is also increasingly used to predict a variety of outcomes including personality (Youyou at al., 2014) and mental health (De Choudhury et al., 2013). We investigate the determinants of social media use and the connection between social media and teenagers' beliefs about education, which are known to be strongly connected to educational outcomes. We construct a representative sample of UK teenagers from British survey data and a sample of Twitter data specifically collected around the first national secondary school exam taken at age 16, which have important effects for further educational choices. Building on literature addressing the factors influencing teen's educational expectations (Anders and Micklewright, 2015) and the construction of beliefs (Gennaioli and Schleifer, 2010; Corazzini et al, 2010; Oxoby, 2014; Coffman, 2014; Alesina et al, 2015; Bordalo et al, 2016a; Bordalo et al. 2016b), we model social media use in the representative sample. We identify significant associations between differential usage (at both the extensive and intensive margin) and controls (socio-demographics, parental inputs and children cognitive and non-cognitive skills), particularly indicating that intensive social media usage is indeed associated with a range of negative factors as found in research on US teens (Twenge, 2017). We also find that beliefs become more gender stereotypical with age, and more so the more tweens and teens are in social media. We then use social network modelling to investigate dynamics in the Twitter sample, and identify significant gender differences in social media communication patterns and moods pertaining to scientific subjects, which indicate social media contribute to educational beliefs, potentially biasing them through the propagation of gender stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Della Giusta & Sarah Jewell & Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, 2017. "Beliefs, Exams and Social Media: A Study of Girls and Boys in the UK," Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2017-02, Henley Business School, Reading University.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2017-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/economics/emdp2017132.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jake Anders, 2012. "What's the link between household income and going to university?," DoQSS Working Papers 12-01, Department of Quantitative Social Science - UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
    2. Akerlof, George A. & Snower, Dennis J., 2016. "Bread and bullets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PB), pages 58-71.
    3. Haroon Chowdry & Claire Crawford & Lorraine Dearden & Alissa Goodman & Anna Vignoles, 2013. "Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(2), pages 431-457, February.
    4. Alberto Alesina & Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Paola Giuliano, 2015. "Family Values And The Regulation Of Labor," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 599-630, August.
    5. Stefano DellaVigna & Ethan Kaplan, 2007. "The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 122(3), pages 1187-1234.
    6. Jake Anders, 2012. "The Link between Household Income, University Applications and University Attendance," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 185-210, June.
    7. Katherine Baldiga Coffman, 2014. "Evidence on Self-Stereotyping and the Contribution of Ideas," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 129(4), pages 1625-1660.
    8. Jake Anders & John Micklewright, 2013. "Teenagers' expectations of applying to university: how do they change?," DoQSS Working Papers 13-13, Department of Quantitative Social Science - UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
    9. Black, Sandra E. & Devereux, Paul J. & Salvanes, Kjell G., 2009. "Like father, like son? A note on the intergenerational transmission of IQ scores," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 138-140, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    beliefs; social media; education; gender; social networks;

    JEL classification:

    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2017-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marie Pearson). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.