Author
Listed:
- Leogrande, Angelo
- Di Molfetta, Mauro
- Nortarnicola, Valeria
- Trotta, Maria Giovanna
Abstract
Voluntary certification policies — which let firms self-nominate for innovative or privileged status — increasingly channel fiscal, financial, and regulatory support, yet evaluating them is deceptively hard: certified firms may outperform because certification works, or simply because firms apply when already rising. We show that voluntary certification can certify winners precisely because rational firms time entry to moments of transitory expansion: the measured premium largely reflects when firms participate, not what participation does. We formalise this as anticipatory take-up: because the benefits are most valuable while a firm scales, forward-looking firms register at the crest of a growth run-up. The mechanism yields three predictions — a cross-sectional premium, a premium that largely predates certification, and entry driven by recent growth, not profitability. We test them in the Italian innovative-SME regime, linking panel data for roughly 2,900 certified and 1,200 non-certified SMEs to each firm's registration date and sector, and treating performance as a six-dimensional vector. Certified firms grow far faster than balanced peers yet are financially less solid, especially when smaller and capital-intensive. Once registration timing is exploited through event-study and staggered difference-in-differences designs, the premium proves largely selection: about 81 per cent of the revenue advantage predates registration, and the residual merely continues a pre-existing trend. A hazard model confirms it — entry rises with recent growth and smaller size, not profitability. The paper reframes the evaluation of voluntary certification from average effects to observable dynamic selection: such schemes mark firms already on distinctive trajectories rather than create them. The lesson generalises — robustness to omitted variables is not robustness to selection on trends, and cross-sectional evaluations mislead unless they exploit the timing of take-up.
Suggested Citation
Leogrande, Angelo & Di Molfetta, Mauro & Nortarnicola, Valeria & Trotta, Maria Giovanna, 2026.
"Picking Winners or Marking Them? Timing-Based Evaluation of Innovation Certification,"
SocArXiv
t4rxy_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:socarx:t4rxy_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/t4rxy_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:t4rxy_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.