IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/5t2f9_v1.html

Ranking Data in Political Science

Author

Listed:
  • Atsusaka, Yuki

    (University of Houston)

  • Singh, Shubhangi

Abstract

Across scientific disciplines, researchers use ranking data to study people's comparative judgments, preferences, and decision-making over a range of items, from medical treatments to political values. Yet existing data repositories have largely overlooked the rich and diverse ranking data collected and analyzed in social science research. In this work, we introduce a database of standardized rankings based on various studies from leading political science journals. Our first release covers 52 datasets from 27 original studies published between 2005 and 2025. Our database demonstrates notable variation in substantive topics and forms of ranking data that go well beyond canonical examples of candidate evaluations and value orientations, enabling researchers to perform comparative analyses, replication, reanalysis, methodological evaluation, and new substantive research with real-world political rankings. Along with validating our database, we illustrate it by replicating key findings in four selected studies, including those of multiple identities in American politics, the representation of Muslims in India, factional leaning in the Syrian civil war, and legislative accountability for affordable health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Atsusaka, Yuki & Singh, Shubhangi, 2026. "Ranking Data in Political Science," SocArXiv 5t2f9_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:5t2f9_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/5t2f9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a5ec8203979a65cc4f5ffa6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/5t2f9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pradel, Franziska & Zilinsky, Jan & Kosmidis, Spyros & Theocharis, Yannis, 2024. "Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 118(4), pages 1895-1912, November.
    2. Searing, Donald D. & Jacoby, William G. & Tyner, Andrew H., 2019. "The Endurance of Politicians’ Values Over Four Decades: A Panel Study," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(1), pages 226-241, February.
    3. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    4. Pedersen, Helene Helboe, 2025. "Legislator or Representative? Politicians’ Tasks According to Voters," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56, pages 1-4, January.
    5. Chris Hanretty & Benjamin E. Lauderdale & Nick Vivyan, 2020. "A Choice‐Based Measure of Issue Importance in the Electorate," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 519-535, July.
    6. Atsusaka, Yuki, 2025. "Analyzing Ballot Order Effects When Voters Rank Candidates," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 64-72, January.
    7. Dietrich, Simone, 2016. "Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(1), pages 65-102, January.
    8. Michael A. Clemens, 2017. "The Meaning Of Failed Replications: A Review And Proposal," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 326-342, February.
    9. Atsusaka, Yuki & Kim, Seo-young Silvia, 2025. "Addressing Measurement Errors in Ranking Questions for the Social Sciences," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 339-360, October.
    10. Patrick Flavin & Michael T. Hartney, 2017. "Racial Inequality in Democratic Accountability: Evidence from Retrospective Voting in Local Elections," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 684-697, July.
    11. McCauley, John F. & Posner, Daniel N., 2019. "The Political Sources of Religious Identification: Evidence from the Burkina Faso–Côte d’Ivoire Border," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 421-441, April.
    12. Rathbun, Brian C. & Pomeroy, Caleb, 2022. "See No Evil, Speak No Evil? Morality, Evolutionary Psychology, and the Nature of International Relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 656-689, March.
    13. Mcmurry, Nina, 2022. "From Recognition to Integration: Indigenous Autonomy, State Authority, and National Identity in the Philippines," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(2), pages 547-563, May.
    14. Doshi, Rush & Kelley, Judith G. & Simmons, Beth A., 2019. "The Power of Ranking: The Ease of Doing Business Indicator and Global Regulatory Behavior," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 611-643, July.
    15. McMurry, Nina, 2022. "From Recognition to Integration: Indigenous Autonomy, State Authority, and National Identity in the Philippines," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 116(2), pages 547-563.
    16. Daniel Corstange & Erin A. York, 2018. "Sectarian Framing in the Syrian Civil War," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(2), pages 441-455, April.
    17. Bakker, Bert N. & Lelkes, Yphtach & Malka, Ariel, 2021. "Reconsidering the Link Between Self-Reported Personality Traits and Political Preferences," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1482-1498, November.
    18. Jacoby, William G., 2014. "Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(4), pages 754-771, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altamirano Rayo, Giorleny & Mosinger, Eric S. & Thaler, Kai M., 2024. "Statebuilding and indigenous rights implementation: Political incentives, social movement pressure, and autonomy policy in Central America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Cheng, Leilei & Yin, Changbin & Chien, Hsiaoping, 2015. "Demand for milk quantity and safety in urban China: evidence from Beijing and Harbin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(2), April.
    3. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
    4. Johannes Buggle & Thierry Mayer & Seyhun Orcan Sakalli & Mathias Thoenig, 2023. "The Refugee’s Dilemma: Evidence from Jewish Migration out of Nazi Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 1273-1345.
    5. Christelis, Dimitris & Dobrescu, Loretti I. & Motta, Alberto, 2020. "Early life conditions and financial risk-taking in older age," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    6. Ortega, David L. & Wang, H. Holly & Wu, Laping & Hong, Soo Jeong, 2015. "Retail channel and consumer demand for food quality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 359-366.
    7. Tina Birgitte Hansen & Jes Sanddal Lindholt & Axel Diederichsen & Rikke Søgaard, 2019. "Do Non-participants at Screening have a Different Threshold for an Acceptable Benefit–Harm Ratio than Participants? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(5), pages 491-501, October.
    8. Doyle, Orla & Fidrmuc, Jan, 2006. "Who favors enlargement?: Determinants of support for EU membership in the candidate countries' referenda," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 520-543, June.
    9. Tovar, Jorge, 2012. "Consumers’ Welfare and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from the Car Industry in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 808-820.
    10. Dumbrell, Nikki P. & Kragt, Marit E. & Gibson, Fiona L., 2016. "What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 29-37.
    11. Yamada, Katsunori & Sato, Masayuki, 2013. "Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-57.
    12. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan & Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez Barroso, Jose-Luis, 2015. "The supply of personal information: A study on the determinants of information provision in e-commerce scenarios," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127174, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Bergtold, Jason & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Caldas, Marcellus & Granco, Gabriel, 2021. "Deal or No Deal? Analysis of Bioenergy Feedstock Contract Choice with Multiple Opt-out Options and Contract Attribute Substitutability," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315289, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Mark Morrison & Craig Nalder, 2009. "Willingness to Pay for Improved Quality of Electricity Supply Across Business Type and Location," The Energy Journal, , vol. 30(2), pages 117-134, April.
    15. Mtimet, Nadhem & Ujiie, Kiyokazu & Kashiwagi, Kenichi & Zaibet, Lokman & Nagaki, Masakazu, "undated". "The effects of Information and Country of Origin on Japanese Olive Oil Consumer Selection," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114642, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Chavez, Daniel E. & Palma, Marco A. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Mjelde, James W., 2020. "Product availability in discrete choice experiments with private goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    17. Dohmen, Thomas & Meyer, Frauke & Walkowitz, Gari, 2026. "Basic Needs Satisfaction as a Fundamental Distributive Principle: Evidence from the Lab and the Field," IZA Discussion Papers 18409, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    19. Choi, Andy S., 2013. "Nonmarket values of major resources in the Korean DMZ areas: A test of distance decay," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 97-107.
    20. Doherty, Edel & Campbell, Danny, 2011. "Demand for improved food safety and quality: a cross-regional comparison," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108791, Agricultural Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:5t2f9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.