Author
Listed:
- Altamirano Rayo, Giorleny
- Mosinger, Eric S.
- Thaler, Kai M.
Abstract
What explains when states strengthen, maintain, or erode political-territorial Indigenous autonomy regimes? Indigenous activists around the world have fought for the right to govern their own lands and communities and have sometimes won major legal concessions from national governments. Yet initial breakthroughs often give way to lackluster state implementation or even erosion of Indigenous autonomy rights. We examine how statebuilding incentives structure governments’ implementation of autonomy, drawing on cases in Central America. Under some circumstances government officials may perceive Indigenous autonomy regimes as the best option to promote state influence over otherwise difficult-to-reach territories and populations. Autonomy regimes may improve governability, for example, in regions where criminal organizations or other armed actors operate. Autonomy regimes may also lead Indigenous peoples to increasingly identify themselves with the national state. Finally, autonomy regimes may further integrate Indigenous communities into markets by creating property relations and consultation mechanisms that defuse Indigenous opposition to extractive projects. When these statebuilding incentives to advance governability, identification, and extraction are absent, however, government officials are more likely to erode autonomy regimes. Through comparisons of the trajectories of Indigenous autonomy regimes in Honduras, Panama, and Nicaragua, we show how these statebuilding concerns shaped state policies towards Indigenous autonomy across governments’ ideologies and regime types. Our findings highlight the importance of examining social movements’ practical consequences, and how aligning movement demands with statebuilding interests may shape whether gains can be defended and sustained, an especially pressing concern for Indigenous movements facing extractive projects, land invasions, and climate change.
Suggested Citation
Altamirano Rayo, Giorleny & Mosinger, Eric S. & Thaler, Kai M., 2024.
"Statebuilding and indigenous rights implementation: Political incentives, social movement pressure, and autonomy policy in Central America,"
World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:175:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x23002863
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106468
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:175:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x23002863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.