IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v98y2020icp10-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Wen, Chieh-Hua
  • Huang, Chia-Jung
  • Fu, Chiang

Abstract

The passenger volumes of cross-Strait air travel between Taiwan and China have grown rapidly, largely due to the gradual introduction of direct flights. This study captures passengers’ preferences for airlines and flight departure times in the Taiwan–China market. The model structures examined include the multinomial logit, nested logit, and mixed nested logit models. In particular, trigonometric functions are incorporated into choice modeling to identify passenger preferences regarding flight departure times. A stated preference survey was conducted at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport. A mixed nested logit model, which captures substitution patterns among competitive alternatives as well as individual heterogeneity, outperforms the other models. The estimation results indicate high degrees of competition among airlines and flight-departure times, especially highly substitutable departure times within the same airline. The continuous departure-time specification, which uses a series of sine and cosine functions, adequately captured passenger preferences. From the qualitative aspect of airline services, a premium for service improvement is highest for cabin crew service, followed by onboard food and check-in service. Airlines can use these results to improve their service quality and adjust flight schedules.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:98:y:2020:i:c:p:10-20
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X17303773
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2012. "Dissecting preference heterogeneity in consumer stated choices," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 331-339.
    2. Milioti, Christina P. & Karlaftis, Matthew G. & Akkogiounoglou, Eleni, 2015. "Traveler perceptions and airline choice: A multivariate probit approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 46-52.
    3. Borenstein, Severin & Netz, Janet, 1999. "Why do all the flights leave at 8 am?: Competition and departure-time differentiation in airline markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 611-640, July.
    4. Alamdari, Fariba, 1999. "Airline in-flight entertainment: the passengers’ perspective," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 203-209.
    5. Coldren, Gregory M. & Koppelman, Frank S., 2005. "Modeling the competition among air-travel itinerary shares: GEV model development," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 345-365, May.
    6. Teichert, Thorsten & Shehu, Edlira & von Wartburg, Iwan, 2008. "Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 227-242, January.
    7. Brey, Raúl & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "Latent temporal preferences: An application to airline travel," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 880-895, November.
    8. Arunotayanun, Kriangkrai & Polak, John W., 2011. "Taste heterogeneity and market segmentation in freight shippers' mode choice behaviour," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 138-148, March.
    9. Saffarzadeh, Mahmoud & Mazaheri, Akram & Tari, Majid Zabihi & Seyedabrishami, Seyedehsan, 2016. "Analysis of Iranian passengers' behavior in choosing type of carrier in international air travel to East Asia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(PB), pages 123-130.
    10. Navarrete, Francisca Javiera & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2013. "Subjective valuation of the transit transfer experience: The case of Santiago de Chile," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 138-147.
    11. Espino, Raquel & Martín, Juan Carlos & Román, Concepción, 2008. "Analyzing the effect of preference heterogeneity on willingness to pay for improving service quality in an airline choice context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 593-606, July.
    12. Michael Scheidler & Reinhard Hujer & Joachim Grammig, 2005. "Discrete choice modelling in airline network management," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 467-486.
    13. Gayle, Philip G. & Yimga, Jules O., 2018. "How much do consumers really value air travel on-time performance, and to what extent are airlines motivated to improve their on-time performance?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 31-41.
    14. Koppelman, Frank S. & Coldren, Gregory M. & Parker, Roger A., 2008. "Schedule delay impacts on air-travel itinerary demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 263-273, March.
    15. Drabas, Tomasz & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2013. "Modelling air carrier choices with a Segment Specific Cross Nested Logit model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 8-16.
    16. Stephane Hess & Mark Fowler & Thomas Adler & Aniss Bahreinian, 2012. "A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 593-625, May.
    17. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    18. Hossain, Ishrat & Saqib, Najam U. & Haq, Munshi Masudul, 2018. "Scale heterogeneity in discrete choice experiment: An application of generalized mixed logit model in air travel choice," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 85-88.
    19. Balcombe, Kelvin & Fraser, Iain & Harris, Liam, 2009. "Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 221-226.
    20. Rose, John M. & Hensher, David A. & Greene, William H., 2005. "Recovering costs through price and service differentiation: Accounting for exogenous information on attribute processing strategies in airline choice," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 400-407.
    21. Seelhorst, Michael & Liu, Yi, 2015. "Latent air travel preferences: Understanding the role of frequent flyer programs on itinerary choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-61.
    22. Bubalo, Branko & Gaggero, Alberto A., 2015. "Low-cost carrier competition and airline service quality in Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 23-31.
    23. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Lai, Shan-Ching, 2010. "Latent class models of international air carrier choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 211-221, March.
    24. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2015. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity and desired substitution pattern in exit choices of pedestrian crowd evacuees using a mixed nested logit model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 58-68.
    25. Hensher, David A. & Stopher, Peter R. & Louviere, Jordan J., 2001. "An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 373-379.
    26. Wuyang Hu, 2008. "Modeling discrete choices with augmented perception hurdles," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(2), pages 257-267, September.
    27. Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A. & Higgins, Matthew J. & Newman, Jeffrey P. & Schyns, Michael, 2018. "Modeling competition among airline itineraries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 157-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krakover, Shaul & Corsale, Andrea, 2021. "Sieving tourism destinations: Decision-making processes and destination choice implications," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 33-43.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cho, Woohyun & Windle, Robert J. & Dresner, Martin E., 2017. "The impact of operational exposure and value-of-time on customer choice: Evidence from the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 455-471.
    2. Koo, Tay T.R. & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Park, Jin-Woo & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2017. "The effect of enhanced international air access on the demand for peripheral tourism destinations: Evidence from air itinerary choice behaviour of Korean visitors to Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 116-129.
    3. Kurtulmuşoğlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Tolon, Metehan, 2016. "A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 130-137.
    4. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    5. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Wang, Wei-Chung & Fu, Chiang, 2012. "Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 545-554.
    6. Redondi, Renato & Birolini, Sebastian & Morlotti, Chiara & Paleari, Stefano, 2021. "Connectivity measures and passengers’ behavior: Comparing conventional connectivity models to predict itinerary market shares," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    8. Tsai, Tsung-Hsien, 2016. "Homogeneous service with heterogeneous products: Relationships among airline ticket fares and purchase fences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 164-175.
    9. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2013. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity in railway passenger choice models based on internet booking data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Balcombe, Kelvin & Fraser, Iain & Harris, Liam, 2009. "Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 221-226.
    11. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2020. "Shippers’ willingness to delegate modal control in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Shao, Shuai & Kauermann, Göran & Smith, Michael Stanley, 2020. "Whether, when and which: Modelling advanced seat reservations by airline passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 490-514.
    13. Tay T. R. Koo & Carlo Caponecchia & Ann Williamson, 2018. "How important is safety in making flight choices? Evidence from simple choice experiments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 159-175, January.
    14. Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Luigi dell’Olio & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla, 2020. "Passengers’ Expectations on Airlines’ Services: Design of a Stated Preference Survey and Preliminary Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Cho, Woohyun & Dresner, Martin E., 2018. "The impact of a baggage fee waiver on airline choice: Evidence from the Washington-Baltimore region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 4-17.
    16. Juan Carlos Martín & Concepción Román & Raquel Espino, 2007. "Willingness to Pay for Airline Service Quality," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 199-217, July.
    17. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2014. "A latent class choice based model system for railway optimal pricing and seat allocation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    18. Birolini, Sebastian & Cattaneo, Mattia & Malighetti, Paolo & Morlotti, Chiara, 2020. "Integrated origin-based demand modeling for air transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Medina-Muñoz, Diego Ramón & Medina-Muñoz, Rita Dolores & Suárez-Cabrera, Miguel à ngel, 2018. "Determining important attributes for assessing the attractiveness of airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    20. Maertens, Sven, 2011. "The market potential of all-premium class services on medium haul leisure routes from Germany," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 181-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:98:y:2020:i:c:p:10-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nithya Sathishkumar). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.