IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v126y2022icp292-305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiated pricing for airline ancillary services considering passenger choice behavior heterogeneity and willingness to pay

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Xinhui
  • Pan, Na
  • Jiang, Hong

Abstract

Under the differentiated service reform of Chinese airlines in 2021, it is an inevitable trend to design and develop differentiated ancillary products, which is the optimization scheme of the supply-side for airlines starting from user demands. The trend of domestic air passengers paying for seat selection is becoming increasingly prevalent. By taking the seat selection fee as an example, this study examines the formulation of ancillary service fees based on passengers' willingness to pay. Using a stated preference (SP) experiment method, this study investigates passengers' seat selection behavior and uses the latent class conditional logit model (LCL) to classify passengers based on seat selection preference. Then, considering the passengers' socioeconomic characteristics, travel characteristics, flight characteristics, seat categories, and passenger categories, this study constructs a model of willingness to pay for seat selection through logit regression. Finally, this study further explores the influencing factors that affect passengers' willingness to pay by using the model and conducting a confirmatory analysis between the model results and the investigation data. The research results show that: (1) passengers' cabin seat selection preferences are heterogeneous, and passengers are divided into three categories; (2) the passenger's personal characteristics (gender, age, etc.) have no significant influence on the willingness to pay for the three categories of passengers; however, the flight purpose for business and leisure travel, day flight, flight duration, the number of luggage, person accompanied, person unaccompanied, and preferred seat have a significant impact on it; (3) the model of willingness to pay has strong correctness and practicability, so in practice, with this method, airlines can predict the willingness to pay for seat selection according to passenger categories and then provide differentiated services and charge fees. It provides theory and decision support for airlines to conduct seat management and design differentiated ancillary service products.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Xinhui & Pan, Na & Jiang, Hong, 2022. "Differentiated pricing for airline ancillary services considering passenger choice behavior heterogeneity and willingness to pay," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 292-305.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:292-305
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22002128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Seung-Bok & Park, Jin-Woo, 2017. "A study on the importance of airline selection attributes by airline type: An emphasis on the difference of opinion in between Korean and overseas aviation experts," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 76-83.
    2. Balcombe, Kelvin & Fraser, Iain & Harris, Liam, 2009. "Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 221-226.
    3. Shao, Shuai & Kauermann, Göran & Smith, Michael Stanley, 2020. "Whether, when and which: Modelling advanced seat reservations by airline passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 490-514.
    4. O'Connell, John F. & Warnock-Smith, David, 2013. "An investigation into traveler preferences and acceptance levels of airline ancillary revenues," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-21.
    5. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2003. "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 681-698, September.
    6. Avogadro, Nicolò & Malighetti, Paolo & Redondi, Renato & Salanti, Andrea, 2021. "A tale of airline competition: When full-service carriers undercut low-cost carriers fares," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    8. Mumbower, Stacey & Garrow, Laurie A. & Newman, Jeffrey P., 2015. "Investigating airline customers’ premium coach seat purchases and implications for optimal pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-69.
    9. Wittmer, Andreas & Rowley, Edward, 2014. "Customer value of purchasable supplementary services: The case of a European full network carrier's economy class," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 17-23.
    10. Teichert, Thorsten & Shehu, Edlira & von Wartburg, Iwan, 2008. "Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 227-242, January.
    11. Andreas Krämer & Mark Friesen & Tom Shelton, 2018. "Are airline passengers ready for personalized dynamic pricing? A study of German consumers," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 115-120, April.
    12. Scotti, Davide & Dresner, Martin, 2015. "The impact of baggage fees on passenger demand on US air routes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 4-10.
    13. Espino, Raquel & Martín, Juan Carlos & Román, Concepción, 2008. "Analyzing the effect of preference heterogeneity on willingness to pay for improving service quality in an airline choice context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 593-606, July.
    14. Chiambaretto, Paul, 2021. "Air passengers’ willingness to pay for ancillary services on long-haul flights," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Ko, Young Dae & Kwag, Sung Il & Oh, Yonghui, 2020. "An efficient airline seat reallocation algorithm considering customer dissatisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Lai, Shan-Ching, 2010. "Latent class models of international air carrier choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 211-221, March.
    17. Paul Chiambaretto, 2021. "Air passengers’ willingness to pay for ancillary services on long-haul flights," Post-Print hal-03514785, HAL.
    18. Michael D. Wittman & Peter P. Belobaba, 2017. "Personalization in airline revenue management – Heuristics for real-time adjustment of availability and fares," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 376-396, August.
    19. Rouncivell, Adam & Timmis, Andrew J. & Ison, Stephen G., 2018. "Willingness to pay for preferred seat selection on UK domestic flights," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 57-61.
    20. Pels, Eric & Rietveld, Piet, 2004. "Airline pricing behaviour in the London–Paris market," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 277-281.
    21. Michael D Wittman & Peter P Belobaba, 2017. "Dynamic availability of fare products with knowledge of customer characteristics," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(2), pages 201-217, April.
    22. Malighetti, Paolo & Paleari, Stefano & Redondi, Renato, 2009. "Pricing strategies of low-cost airlines: The Ryanair case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 195-203.
    23. Garrow, Laurie A. & Hotle, Susan & Mumbower, Stacey, 2012. "Assessment of product debundling trends in the US airline industry: Customer service and public policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 255-268.
    24. Ødegaard, Fredrik & Wilson, John G., 2016. "Dynamic pricing of primary products and ancillary services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 586-599.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Zhenjie & Zhang, Dezhi & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Fazi, Stefano, 2023. "Integrated multimodal freight service network design and pricing with a competing service integrator and heterogeneous shipper classes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stacey Mumbower & Susan Hotle & Laurie A. Garrow, 2023. "Highly debated but still unbundled: The evolution of U.S. airline ancillary products and pricing strategies," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 276-293, August.
    2. Chiambaretto, Paul, 2021. "Air passengers’ willingness to pay for ancillary services on long-haul flights," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Zhao, Guihong & Cui, Yue & Cheng, Shaoyu, 2021. "Dynamic pricing of ancillary services based on passenger choice behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Jeon, Mi-Sun & Lee, Jang-Ho, 2020. "Estimation of willingness-to-pay for premium economy class by type of service," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Leon, Steven & Uddin, Nizam, 2017. "Airline Ancillary Services: An Investigation into Passenger Purchase Behavior," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 56(1), April.
    6. Michael D. Wittman & Peter P. Belobaba, 2018. "Customized dynamic pricing of airline fare products," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 78-90, April.
    7. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    8. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Huang, Chia-Jung & Fu, Chiang, 2020. "Incorporating continuous representation of preferences for flight departure times into stated itinerary choice modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 10-20.
    9. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    10. Tsai, Tsung-Hsien, 2016. "Homogeneous service with heterogeneous products: Relationships among airline ticket fares and purchase fences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 164-175.
    11. Hetrakul, Pratt & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2013. "Accommodating taste heterogeneity in railway passenger choice models based on internet booking data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-16.
    12. Shao, Shuai & Kauermann, Göran & Smith, Michael Stanley, 2020. "Whether, when and which: Modelling advanced seat reservations by airline passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 490-514.
    13. Rouncivell, Adam & Timmis, Andrew J. & Ison, Stephen G., 2018. "Willingness to pay for preferred seat selection on UK domestic flights," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 57-61.
    14. Adam Bockelie & Peter Belobaba, 2017. "Incorporating ancillary services in airline passenger choice models," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(6), pages 553-568, December.
    15. Koo, Tay T.R. & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Park, Jin-Woo & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2017. "The effect of enhanced international air access on the demand for peripheral tourism destinations: Evidence from air itinerary choice behaviour of Korean visitors to Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 116-129.
    16. Miyoshi, Chikage & Rubio Molina-Prados, Jesus, 2022. "Measuring the impact of long-haul low-cost carriers on lowering fares: A quasi-experimental design to assess the pre-COVID market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 52-64.
    17. Hugon-Duprat, Cindy & O'Connell, John F., 2015. "The rationale for implementing a premium economy class in the long haul markets – Evidence from the transatlantic market," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 11-19.
    18. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    19. Tay T. R. Koo & Carlo Caponecchia & Ann Williamson, 2018. "How important is safety in making flight choices? Evidence from simple choice experiments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 159-175, January.
    20. Kurtulmuşoğlu, Feride Bahar & Can, Gülin Feryal & Tolon, Metehan, 2016. "A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 130-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:292-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.