IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

La gestion optimale d'une forêt exploitée pour son potentiel de diminution des gaz à effet de serre et son bois

Listed author(s):

Forests emit and absorb carbon. Although the portion of anthropic climate change that can be attributed to forestry activities and land use is small relative to the contribution of fossil fuels consumption, it is by no mean negligible. The role that the forest may play as a sink or a source of greenhouse gases (GHG) has been recognized in the process leading to the Kyoto agreement and the necessity to encourage improvements in that respect has also been stressed. In countries such as Canada, for example, forests have been a net sink to the tune of about 70 Million t per year for the best part of the century, but various factors made it a net source in the late 1980's. Rough calculations based on Winjum (1998) indicate that changes that would reduce by one third the sources associated with wood harvest only (twigs, branches, tops, and stumps left to be burned or to decompose) could contribute almost a fifth of Canada's Kyoto commitment. Many other factors have been identified as potentially significant contributors to a forest's GHG emission balance. Human factors are crucial in that respect. They can be decomposed into three major components that need to be investigated from a theoretical point of view before their impact can be appraised, and before behaviors can be targeted from a policy point of view. The first factor is forest management; the second factor is the mix and use of forest products; the third element is forest area. Our paper is part of a research program which addresses all three factors. It deals with the first factor: forest management. Although externalities have been added to old and new formulations of the tree cutting problem, the GHG externality turns out to be special. It results in a positive flow during growth; it becomes insignificant when net growth is over; harvest releases part of the carbon locked into wood back into the atmosphere but also allows the beginning of a new carbon locking rotation; meanwhile the carbon contained in harvested wood products is released into the atmosphere at rates that are highly dependent on the type of product (fire wood, paper, construction wood, etc.). Our paper provides a theoretical analysis of the socially optimal harvesting decision when society attributes value to carbon being locked into wood and when wood prices evolve randomly as in Reed and Clarke (1990). We provide results and comparative statics results on optimum cutting age and carbon emissions under socially optimal, versus private, management. In the process we also provide the forest value function relevant to the decision whether to devote land to forestry or to alternative uses. This is the central element necessary to address the third component of our research program: the determination of forest area and its impact on GHG emissions.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques in its series Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM with number 20-03.

in new window

Date of creation: Feb 2001
Publication status: forthcoming, Actualité économique
Handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:20-03
Contact details of provider: Postal:
P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8

Phone: (514) 987-4114
Fax: (514) 987-8494
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Nelson, Daniel B & Ramaswamy, Krishna, 1990. "Simple Binomial Processes as Diffusion Approximations in Financial Models," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(3), pages 393-430.
  2. Snyder, Donald L. & Bhattacharyya, Rabindra N., 1990. "A more general dynamic economic model of the optimal rotation of multiple-use forests," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 168-175, March.
  3. Nordhaus, William D, 1991. "A Sketch of the Economics of the Greenhouse Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 146-150, May.
  4. William R. Cline, 1992. "Economics of Global Warming, The," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 39, November.
  5. Mendelsohn, Robert & Nordhaus, William D & Shaw, Daigee, 1994. "The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 753-771, September.
  6. G. Cornelis van Kooten & Clark S. Binkley & Gregg Delcourt, 1995. "Effect of Carbon Taxes and Subsidies on Optimal Forest Rotation Age and Supply of Carbon Services," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(2), pages 365-374.
  7. Thomas A. Thomson, 1992. "Optimal Forest Rotation When Stumpage Prices Follow a Diffusion Process," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 329-342.
  8. Yin, Runsheng & Newman, David H., 1996. "The Effect of Catastrophic Risk on Forest Investment Decisions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 186-197, September.
  9. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
  10. Morck, Randall & Schwartz, Eduardo & Stangeland, David, 1989. "The Valuation of Forestry Resources under Stochastic Prices and Inventories," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(04), pages 473-487, December.
  11. G. Cornelis van Kooten & Louise M. Arthur & W. R. Wilson, 1992. "Potential to Sequester Carbon in Canadian Forests: Some Economic Considerations," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(2), pages 127-138, June.
  12. Conrad, Jon M., 1997. "On the option value of old-growth forest," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 97-102, August.
  13. Amin, Kaushik I., 1991. "On the Computation of Continuous Time Option Prices Using Discrete Approximations," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(04), pages 477-495, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:20-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stéphane Pallage)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.