IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12762.html

Local Labor Market Tightness and Job Quality: Evidence from Job Changers

Author

Listed:
  • Brad Hershbein
  • Katherine Lim
  • Douglas Webber
  • Mike Zabek

Abstract

We examine how labor market tightness affects workers' job amenities and quality. Using novel data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED), and multiple measures of labor market tightness, we estimate that a 10 percent increase in job vacancies per thousand residents leads to a 7-12 percent increase in the probability of changing jobs, an 11-18 percent increase in the (unconditional) probability of switching to a self-assessed overall better job, and similar-size increases in pay and benefits, interest in the work, and better opportunities for advancement. Tight labor markets thus not only improve worker pay, in line with earlier studies, but also improve job amenities more broadly, and by roughly the same proportion. Consequently, the benefits to workers of a tight labor market are likely underestimated when based on pay alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad Hershbein & Katherine Lim & Douglas Webber & Mike Zabek, 2026. "Local Labor Market Tightness and Job Quality: Evidence from Job Changers," CESifo Working Paper Series 12762, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12762.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Lavetti, 2023. "Compensating Wage Differentials in Labor Markets: Empirical Challenges and Applications," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(3), pages 189-212, Summer.
    2. Giuseppe Moscarini & Fabien Postel-Vinay, 2017. "The Relative Power of Employment-to-Employment Reallocation and Unemployment Exits in Predicting Wage Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 364-368, May.
    3. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    4. Tor Eriksson & Nicolai Kristensen, 2014. "Wages or Fringes? Some Evidence on Trade-Offs and Sorting," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(4), pages 899-928.
    5. Iacopo Morchio & Christian Moser, 2026. "The Gender Pay Gap: Micro Sources and Macro Consequences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 116(5), pages 1765-1810, May.
    6. Nicole Maestas & Kathleen J. Mullen & David Powell & Till von Wachter & Jeffrey B. Wenger, 2023. "The Value of Working Conditions in the United States and the Implications for the Structure of Wages," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(7), pages 2007-2047, July.
    7. Christopher A. Pissarides & Barbara Petrongolo, 2001. "Looking into the Black Box: A Survey of the Matching Function," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 390-431, June.
    8. Zoë Cullen & Bobak Pakzad-Hurson & Ricardo Perez-Truglia, 2025. "Home Sweet Home: How Much Do Employees Value Remote Work?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 115, pages 276-281, May.
    9. Timothy J. Bartik, 1991. "Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number wbsle.
    10. David Autor & Arindrajit Dube & Annie McGrew, 2023. "The Unexpected Compression: Competition at Work in the Low Wage Labor Market," NBER Working Papers 31010, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Robert H. Topel & Michael P. Ward, 1992. "Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 439-479.
    12. Royalty, Anne Beeson, 2008. "Estimating workers' marginal valuation of employer health benefits: Would insured workers prefer more health insurance or higher wages," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 89-105, January.
    13. Anders Humlum & Mette Rasmussen & Evan K. Rose, 2025. "Firm Premia and Match Effects in Pay vs. Amenities," NBER Working Papers 33884, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Lorenzo Lagos, 2025. "Union Bargaining Power and the Amenity-Wage Tradeoff," NBER Working Papers 34186, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Bound, John & Holzer, Harry J, 2000. "Demand Shifts, Population Adjustments, and Labor Market Outcomes during the 1980s," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(1), pages 20-54, January.
    16. Viola Corradini & Lorenzo Lagos & Garima Sharma, 2025. "Collective Bargaining for Women: How Unions Can Create Female-Friendly Jobs," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(3), pages 2053-2105.
    17. Robert E. Hall & Marianna Kudlyak, 2019. "Job-Finding and Job-Losing: A Comprehensive Model of Heterogeneous Individual Labor-Market Dynamics," NBER Working Papers 25625, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Danny Yagan, 2019. "Employment Hysteresis from the Great Recession," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 2505-2558.
    19. Isaac Sorkin, 2018. "Ranking Firms Using Revealed Preference," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(3), pages 1331-1393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faberman, Jason & Mueller, Andreas & Sahin, Aysegül, 2026. "Job Search, Job Amenities, and the Gender Pay Gap," IZA Discussion Papers 18418, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Markus Nagler & Johannes Rincke & Erwin Winkler, 2024. "Working from home, commuting, and gender," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Arellano-Bover, Jaime & San, Shmuel, 2023. "The Role of Firms and Job Mobility in the Assimilation of Immigrants: Former Soviet Union Jews in Israel 1990–2019," IZA Discussion Papers 16389, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Collis, Manuela R. & Van Effenterre, Clémentine, 2025. "Workplace Hostility," IZA Discussion Papers 18302, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Simon Cordes & Max Müller, 2026. "Do Firms Know What Workers Want?," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_739, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    6. Sam Desiere & Christian Walter, 2025. "The Shift Premium: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(3), pages 508-524, September.
    7. Michael Amior, 2024. "Education and Geographical Mobility: The Role of the Job Surplus," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 341-381, November.
    8. Jean Flemming, 2018. "Costly Commuting and the Job Ladder," 2018 Meeting Papers 100, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. Benjamin Lochner & Christian Merkl, 2026. "Gender-Specific Application Behaviour, Matching, and the Residual Gender Earnings Gap," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(673), pages 97-124.
    10. Jason Sockin, 2022. "Show Me the Amenity: Are Higher-Paying Firms Better All Around?," CESifo Working Paper Series 9842, CESifo.
    11. Lambert, Peter John & Schindler, Yannick, 2026. "The Broken Ladder: AI, Remote Work, and Early-Career Hiring," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 808, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    12. Haoran He & David Neumark & Qian Weng, 2021. "Do Workers Value Flexible Jobs? A Field Experiment," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(3), pages 709-738.
    13. Benjamin W. Arold & Elliott Ash & W. Bentley MacLeod & Suresh Naidu, 2025. "Worker Rights in Collective Bargaining," CESifo Working Paper Series 11766, CESifo.
    14. Tanaka, Satoshi & Warren, Lawrence & Wiczer, David, 2023. "Earnings growth, job flows and churn," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 86-98.
    15. Katherine Lim & Mike Zabek, 2024. "What makes a job better? Survey evidence from job changers," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2024-004, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    16. Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Victoria Vernon, 2025. "Remote work, wages, and hours worked in the United States," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-49, March.
    17. Thimo De Schouwer & Sebastiaan Maes & Tom Potoms, 2026. "The Price of Long Hours," CESifo Working Paper Series 12779, CESifo.
    18. Minwoo Hyun, 2025. "Trapped or Transferred: Worker Mobility and Labor Market Power in the Energy Transition," Working Papers 25-76, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    19. Olle Folke & Johanna Rickne, 2022. "Sexual Harassment and Gender Inequality in the Labor Market [High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 137(4), pages 2163-2212.
    20. Tristany Armangue-Jubert & Tancredi Rapone & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2026. "Firm Dynamics, Monopsony, and Aggregate Productivity Differences," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 59, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
    • J62 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Job, Occupational and Intergenerational Mobility; Promotion

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.