IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ucsdec/qt0gf0w872.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Let׳s talk it over: Coordination via preplay communication with level-k thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Crawford, Vincent P

Abstract

This paper reconsiders Joseph Farrell׳s (1987) and Matthew Rabin׳s (1994) analyses of coordination via preplay communication, focusing on Farrell׳s analysis of Battle of the Sexes. Replacing their equilibrium and rationalizability assumptions with a structural non-equilibrium model based on level-k thinking, I reevaluate FR׳s assumptions on how players use language and their conclusions on the limits of communication in bringing about coordination. The analysis partly supports their assumptions about how players use language, but suggests that their “agreements” do not reflect a full meeting of the minds. A level-k analysis also yields very different conclusions about the effectiveness of communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Crawford, Vincent P, 2017. "Let׳s talk it over: Coordination via preplay communication with level-k thinking," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt0gf0w872, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt0gf0w872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0gf0w872.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keshav Dogra, 2024. "Paradoxes and Problems in the Causal Interpretation of Equilibrium Economics," Staff Reports 1093, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    2. Dietrichson, Jens & Gudmundsson, Jens & Jochem, Torsten, 2022. "Why don’t we talk about it? Communication and coordination in teams," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 257-278.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt0gf0w872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deucsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.