IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2018_271.html

Brownfield areas and housing value: Evidence from Milan

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Gibilaro
  • Gianluca Mattarocci

Abstract

The existence of brownfield areas inside a city has negative effects on the real estate market due to the decrease of the demand for real estate assets nearby for both the prices and rents.The impact could be different on the basis of the different type of real estate investment considered and normally the impact is expected to be higher for residential assets. The paper evaluates the economic effect of abandoned real estate in the city of Milan for the time period 1993-2016 and shows that the city is characterised by a concentration of abandoned/dismissed assets in some city districts. Using standard hedonic models, the paper shows that the existence of brownfield areas nearby a real estate asset affects negatively its price and the negative contribution on price could be even higher than some district/building features.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Gibilaro & Gianluca Mattarocci, 2018. "Brownfield areas and housing value: Evidence from Milan," ERES eres2018_271, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2018-271
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/P_20180131231309_543.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Simons & Roberto G. Quercia & Ivan Maric, 1998. "The Value Impact of New Residential Construction and Neighborhood Disinvestment on Residential Sales Price," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 15(2), pages 147-162.
    2. Michael Greenberg & Karen Lowrie & Henry Mayer & K. Tyler Miller & Laura Solitare, 2001. "Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 129-143, June.
    3. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    4. White, Michelle J., 1986. "Property taxes and urban housing abandonment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 312-330, November.
    5. Mark van Duijn & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "Analysis of household location behaviour, local amenities and house prices in a sorting framework," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 280-297, July.
    6. Kris Wernstedt & Peter B. Meyer & Anna Alberini, 2006. "Attracting private investment to contaminated properties: The value of public interventions," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 247-369.
    7. Northridge, M.E. & Yankura, J. & Kinney, P.L. & Santella, R.M. & Shepard, P. & Riojas, Y. & Aggarwal, M. & Strickland, P., 1999. "Diesel exhaust exposure among adolescents in Harlem: A community-driven study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(7), pages 998-1002.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey Zabel, 2007. "The Impact of Imperfect Information on the Transactions of Contaminated Properties," NCEE Working Paper Series 200703, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    2. Boris A. Portnov & Yakov Odish & Larissa Fleishman, 2005. "Factors Affecting Housing Modifications and Housing Pricing: A Case Study of Four Residential Neighborhoods in Haifa, Israel," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 27(4), pages 371-408.
    3. Zhenguo Lin & Eric Rosenblatt & Vincent Yao, 2009. "Spillover Effects of Foreclosures on Neighborhood Property Values," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 387-407, May.
    4. Ayoung Woo & Sugie Lee, 2016. "Illuminating the impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing prices: Case of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the US," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1107-1132, June.
    5. Zabel, Jeffrey, 2007. "The Impact of Imperfect Information on the Transactions of Contaminated Properties," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280853, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    6. Alm, James & Hawley, Zackary & Lee, Jin Man & Miller, Joshua J., 2016. "Property tax delinquency and its spillover effects on nearby properties," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 71-77.
    7. Christopher A. De Sousa & Changshan Wu & Lynne M. Westphal, 2009. "Assessing the Effect of Publicly Assisted Brownfield Redevelopment on Surrounding Property Values," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(2), pages 95-110, May.
    8. Thomas J. Fitzpatrick & Stephan D. Whitaker, 2012. "The impact of vacant, tax-delinquent, and foreclosed property on sales prices of neighboring homes," Working Papers (Old Series) 1123, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    9. Ayoung Woo & Kenneth Joh & Shannon Van Zandt, 2016. "Unpacking the impacts of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program on nearby property values," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2488-2510, September.
    10. Hao Huang & Jianyi Li, 2021. "The spatial variation of moderating effects of density and natural amenities on housing prices in Wuhan, China," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1778-1804, December.
    11. Fernando Carriazo & Julian PeÔøΩaranda, 2015. "The Effect of Commuting Costs to Employment Centers on Urban Property Values: A Spatial Analysis in Bogot√°, Colombia," Documentos CEDE 13133, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    12. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Lucija Muehlenbachs & Elisheba Spiller & Christopher Timmins, 2015. "The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(12), pages 3633-3659, December.
    14. Hassan, Daniel & Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette, 2003. "Transmission des prix dans la filière fruits: une approche hédonique," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 275.
    15. Maristella Botticini & Aloysius Siow, 2003. "Why Dowries?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1385-1398, September.
    16. Guilfoos, Todd & Walsh, Jason, 2023. "A hedonic study of New England dam removals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Alexander Kihm & Colin Vance, 2016. "The determinants of equity transmission between the new and used car markets: a hedonic analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(10), pages 1250-1258, October.
    18. Huang, Chung L. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2006. "A Hedonic Analysis on the Implicit Values of Fresh Tomatoes," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25404, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Muhammad Rafiq & Mir Kalan Shah, 2010. "The Value of Reduced Risk of Injury and Deaths in Pakistan—Using Actual and Perceived Risk Estimates," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 823-837.
    20. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 687-720, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.