IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.12420.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Game Theory Analysis of Third-Party Regulation in Organic Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Joao Zambujal-Oliveira
  • Andre Silva
  • Rui Vasconcelos

Abstract

As people become more conscious of their health and the environment, the demand for organic food is expected to increase. However, distinguishing organic products from conventionally produced ones can be hard, creating a problem where producers may have the incentive to label their conventional products as organic to sell them at a higher price. Game theory can help to analyze the strategic interactions between producers and consumers in order to help consumers verifying these claims. Through a game theory analysis approach, this paper provides evidence of the need for a third party to equalize markets and foster trust in organic supply chains. Therefore, government regulation, including regular and random monitoring and certification requirements, plays a crucial role in achieving the desired level of trust and information exchange among supply chain agents, which ultimately determines the growth trajectory of the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Joao Zambujal-Oliveira & Andre Silva & Rui Vasconcelos, 2025. "Game Theory Analysis of Third-Party Regulation in Organic Supply Chains," Papers 2510.12420, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.12420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.12420
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis H. Amato & Arthur Zillante & Christie H Amato, 2015. "Corporate environmental claims: a game theory model with empirical results," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 36-55, March.
    2. Kathleen Segerson, 1999. "Mandatory versus voluntary approaches to food safety," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 53-70.
    3. Mariya Bondareva & Edieal Pinker, 2019. "Dynamic Relational Contracts for Quality Enforcement in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1305-1321, March.
    4. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1989. "Noncooperative game theory for industrial organization: An introduction and overview," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 259-327, Elsevier.
    5. Konstantinos Giannakas, 2002. "Information Asymmetries and Consumption Decisions in Organic Food Product Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(1), pages 35-50, March.
    6. Starbird S. Andrew & Amanor-Boadu Vincent, 2007. "Contract Selectivity, Food Safety, and Traceability," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Miguel Carriquiry & Bruce A. Babcock, 2007. "Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(1), pages 12-23.
    8. Ladwein, Richard & Sánchez Romero, Andrea Milena, 2021. "The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Luanne Lohr, 1998. "Implications of Organic Certification for Market Structure and Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(5), pages 1125-1129.
    10. Hatanaka, Maki & Bain, Carmen & Busch, Lawrence, 2005. "Third-party certification in the global agrifood system," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 354-369, June.
    11. Faical Akaichi & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr & José M. Gil, 2012. "Assessing Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Different Units of Organic Milk: Evidence from Multiunit Auctions," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 60(4), pages 469-494, December.
    12. Chen, Yi-Chun & Long, Ngo Van & Luo, Xiao, 2007. "Iterated strict dominance in general games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 299-315, November.
    13. Eva-Marie Meemken & Matin Qaim, 2018. "Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 39-63, October.
    14. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    15. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2012. "A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 568-583.
    16. Häring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2009. "Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 265-272, June.
    17. repec:hal:journl:hal-04457588 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mariah Dolsen Ehmke & Alessandro Bonanno & Kathryn Boys & Trenton G. Smith, 2019. "Food fraud: economic insights into the dark side of incentives," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), pages 685-700, October.
    19. Asier Baquero, 2022. "Net Promoter Score (NPS) and Customer Satisfaction: Relationship and Efficient Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Louis H. Amato & Arthur Zillante & Christie H Amato, 2015. "Corporate environmental claims: a game theory model with empirical results," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 36-55, March.
    21. McCluskey, Jill J., 2000. "A Game Theoretic Approach to Organic Foods: An Analysis of Asymmetric Information and Policy," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 1-9, April.
    22. Sanogo, Diakalia & Masters, William A., 2002. "A market-based approach to child nutrition: mothers' demand for quality certification of infant foods in Bamako, Mali," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 251-268, June.
    23. Hong Zhang & Paul Georgescu, 2022. "Sustainable Organic Farming, Food Safety and Pest Management: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, June.
    24. Noelke, Corinna M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2000. "A Model Of The Implementation Of Quality Management Systems For Credence Attributes," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21874, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    25. J. Zambujal-Oliveira, 2021. "Supply Chain Innovation Research: A Conceptual Approach of Information Management with Game Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 377-394, April.
    26. Yanan Yu & Yong He & Xuan Zhao & Li Zhou, 2022. "Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 645-675, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anders, Sven M. & Souza Monteiro, Diogo M. & Rouviere, Elodie, 2007. "Objectiveness in the Market for Third-Party Certification: Does market structure matter?," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7894, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Jiayang Xu & Jian Cao & Sanjay Kumar & Sisi Wu, 2023. "Optimal government and manufacturer incentive contracts for green production with asymmetric information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Liu, Jing & Xia, Senmao & Wang, Zhaoxing & Nie, Jiajia & Ameen, Nisreen & Yan, Cheng & Lim, Ming K., 2023. "How to balance economic profits and environmental protection: The impacts of cash hedging on remanufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Padilla Bravo, Carlos Antonio & Spiller, Achim & Villalobos, Pablo, . "Are Organic Growers Satisfied with the Certification System? A Causal Analysis of Farmers’ Perceptions in Chile," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22.
    5. Zhao, Li & Gu, Haiying & Yue, Chengyan & Ahlstrom, David, 2013. "Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 58-70.
    6. Minarelli, Francesca & Galioto, Francesco & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2016. "Modelling asymmetric information in a food supply chain within Emilia Romagna Region," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 245071, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Giovanni Anania & Rosanna Nisticò, 2004. "Public Regulation as a Substitute for Trust in Quality Food Markets: What if the Trust Substitute cannot be Fully Trusted?," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 160(4), pages 681-701, December.
    8. Grolleau, Gilles & Caswell, Julie A., 2006. "Interaction Between Food Attributes in Markets: The Case of Environmental Labeling," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Stancu, Alina & Suvorov, Nicolae, 2021. "Step By Step Conversion to Organic Agriculture," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 3(01), June.
    10. Gabriele Jahn & Matthias Schramm & Achim Spiller, 2005. "The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 53-73, December.
    11. Steven C. Blank & Gary D. Thompson, 2004. "Can/Should/Will A Niche Become the Norm? Organic Agriculture's Short Past and Long Future," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(4), pages 483-503, October.
    12. Raburn, Samuel, 2024. "Optimal Quality Standards for Credence Goods: An Application to Organic Strawberries and the Commercial Availability Clause Loophole," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343623, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Jahn, Gabriele & Schramm, Matthias & Spiller, Achim, . "Institutioneller Wandel der Qualitätssicherung im ökologischen Landbau: Zur Selbstauflösung der Verbandskontrolle," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40.
    14. Baker, Andrew & Smyth, Stuart, 2010. "Managing Opportunism in Value-Added Supply Chains:," 14th ICABR Conference, June 16-18, 2010, Ravello, Italy 187979, International Consortium on Applied Bioeconomy Research (ICABR).
    15. Adalja, Aaron & Lichtenberg, Erik, 2018. "Produce growers’ cost of complying with the Food Safety Modernization Act," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 23-38.
    16. Charlier, Christophe & Valceschini, Egizio, 2010. "Food Safety, Market Power and Private Standards: An Analysis of the Emerging Strategies of Food Operators," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-8.
    17. Chloé Tankam & Dominique Vollet & Olivier Aznar, 2019. "Between information asymmetry and shared uncertainty, an analysis of organic certification systems for the Kenyan domestic market [Entre asymétrie d'information et incertitude partagée analyse des ," Post-Print hal-02534461, HAL.
    18. Karlis Rokpelnis & Peter Ho & Gong Cheng & Heng Zhao, 2018. "Consumer Perceptions of the Commodification and Related Conservation of Traditional Indigenous Naxi Forest Products as Credence Goods (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Fakheri, Sajjad & Bahrami-Bidoni, Zeynab & Makui, Ahmad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto DR., 2022. "A sustainable competitive supply chain network design for a green product under uncertainty: A case study of Iranian leather industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Rokpelnis, Karlis & Ho, Peter & Cheng, Gong & Zhao, Heng, 2018. "Consumer perceptions of the commodification and related conservation of traditional indigenous Naxi forest products as credence goods (China)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.12420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.