IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404541.html

What Drives Persistent Cost-Price Squeezes in Food Systems?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Xuemei
  • Yu, Xiaohua

Abstract

Cost–price squeeze (CPS) is an important but under-measured form of producer-side stress in food systems. It occurs when rising production costs are not sufficiently matched by output-price adjustments, resulting in compressed producer margins. While existing research has documented agricultural profitability pressures in specific commodities or countries, less is known about the conditions under which CPS emerges across global staple crop systems. This paper examines the drivers of CPS using a harmonized country–year panel for maize, wheat, and rice systems over 2000–2023. Building on an outcome-based CPS indicator developed in a companion pattern paper, we estimate fixed-effects models, fertilizer shock-exposure specifications, placebo tests, and machine-learning prediction models. The results show that exchange-rate pressure is the most stable external predictor of CPS risk, suggesting that macro-external price exposure plays an important role in producer margin stress. More importantly, global fertilizer price shocks disproportionately increase CPS risk in countries with higher pre-period fertilizer intensity. This shock-exposure result remains robust after controlling for lagged macroeconomic, food-trade, agricultural-structure, and climate variables, while a lead-shock placebo is statistically insignificant. Nutrient-specific estimates indicate that nitrogen exposure is the most consistent fertilizer-related channel. Machine-learning models provide complementary predictive validation: Random Forest, XGBoost, and LASSO-logit models achieve meaningful out-of-sample performance, and fertilizer shock exposure, nitrogen shock exposure, food-trade variables, and global fertilizer shocks rank among the most important predictors. The findings suggest that CPS risk emerges from the interaction between external cost shocks and country-specific exposure structures, highlighting the importance of monitoring input dependence as an early-warning indicator of food-system vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Xuemei & Yu, Xiaohua, 2026. "What Drives Persistent Cost-Price Squeezes in Food Systems?," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404541, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404541
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404541/files/177554_192670_115232_CPS_driver_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T.E. Glau, 1971. "The Cost‐Price Squeeze On Australian Farm Income," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Christophe Gouel & Sébastien Jean, 2015. "Optimal Food Price Stabilization in a Small Open Developing Country," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(1), pages 72-101.
    3. Hal R. Varian, 2014. "Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 3-28, Spring.
    4. Thomas Kopp & Richard J. Sexton, 2021. "Farmers, Traders, and Processors: Buyer Market Power and Double Marginalization in Indonesia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 543-568, March.
    5. Thompson, Wyatt & Dewbre, Joe & Pieralli, Simone & Schroeder, Kateryna & Pérez Domínguez, Ignacio & Westhoff, Patrick, 2019. "Long-term crop productivity response and its interaction with cereal markets and energy prices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Daniel A. Sumner, 2014. "American Farms Keep Growing: Size, Productivity, and Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(1), pages 147-166, Winter.
    7. Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 87-106, Spring.
    8. Petra Hellegers, 2022. "Food security vulnerability due to trade dependencies on Russia and Ukraine," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(6), pages 1503-1510, December.
    9. Headey, Derek, 2011. "Rethinking the global food crisis: The role of trade shocks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 136-146, April.
    10. Glau, T.E., 1971. "The Cost-Price Squeeze On Australian Farm Income," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 15(01), pages 1-19, April.
    11. A. Colin Cameron & Douglas L. Miller, 2015. "A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 317-372.
    12. Uris Lantz C. Baldos & Keith O. Fuglie & Thomas W. Hertel, 2020. "The research cost of adapting agriculture to climate change: A global analysis to 2050," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 207-220, March.
    13. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    14. Jean‐Paul Chavas, 2019. "Adverse Shocks in Agriculture: The Assessment and Management of Downside Risk," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 731-748, September.
    15. Acharya, Shabd S., 2006. "Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(2), July.
    16. Ariel Ortiz-Bobea & Toby R. Ault & Carlos M. Carrillo & Robert G. Chambers & David B. Lobell, 2021. "Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(4), pages 306-312, April.
    17. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2014. "High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 29-50, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Croux, Christophe & Jagtiani, Julapa & Korivi, Tarunsai & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "Important factors determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 270-296.
    2. Georges, Christophre & Pereira, Javier, 2021. "Market stability with machine learning agents," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Andreas Fuster & Paul Goldsmith‐Pinkham & Tarun Ramadorai & Ansgar Walther, 2022. "Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 5-47, February.
    4. Shengying Zhai & Qihui Chen & Wenxin Wang, 2019. "What Drives Green Fodder Supply in China?—A Nerlovian Analysis with LASSO Variable Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Colin F. Camerer & Gideon Nave & Alec Smith, 2019. "Dynamic Unstructured Bargaining with Private Information: Theory, Experiment, and Outcome Prediction via Machine Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1867-1890, April.
    6. Jo~ao B. Assunc{c}~ao & Pedro Afonso Fernandes, 2024. "The Surprising Robustness of Partial Least Squares," Papers 2409.05713, arXiv.org.
    7. Byron Botha & Rulof Burger & Kevin Kotzé & Neil Rankin & Daan Steenkamp, 2023. "Big data forecasting of South African inflation," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 149-188, July.
    8. Sun, Weixin & Wang, Yong & Zhang, Li & Chen, Xihui Haviour & Hoang, Yen Hai, 2025. "Enhancing economic cycle forecasting based on interpretable machine learning and news narrative sentiment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Teck-Hua Ho & Noah Lim & Sadat Reza & Xiaoyu Xia, 2017. "OM Forum—Causal Inference Models in Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 509-525, October.
    10. Jorge Mejia & Shawn Mankad & Anandasivam Gopal, 2019. "A for Effort? Using the Crowd to Identify Moral Hazard in New York City Restaurant Hygiene Inspections," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1363-1386, December.
    11. Michael C. Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2022. "Heterogeneous Employment Effects of Job Search Programs: A Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(2), pages 597-636.
    12. Jeffrey D. Michler & Anna Josephson, 2022. "Recent developments in inference: practicalities for applied economics," Chapters, in: A Modern Guide to Food Economics, chapter 11, pages 235-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Susan Athey, 2018. "The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 507-547, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Francesco Bloise & Paolo Brunori & Patrizio Piraino, 2021. "Estimating intergenerational income mobility on sub-optimal data: a machine learning approach," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(4), pages 643-665, December.
    15. Akash Malhotra, 2021. "A hybrid econometric–machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: prioritizing food policy," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 549-581, September.
    16. Mckenzie,David J. & Sansone,Dario & Mckenzie,David J. & Sansone,Dario, 2017. "Man vs. machine in predicting successful entrepreneurs : evidence from a business plan competition in Nigeria," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8271, The World Bank.
    17. Andini, Monica & Boldrini, Michela & Ciani, Emanuele & de Blasio, Guido & D'Ignazio, Alessio & Paladini, Andrea, 2022. "Machine learning in the service of policy targeting: The case of public credit guarantees," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 434-475.
    18. Philipp Bach & Victor Chernozhukov & Sven Klaassen & Martin Spindler & Jan Teichert-Kluge & Suhas Vijaykumar, 2024. "Adventures in Demand Analysis Using AI," Papers 2501.00382, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    19. Stepan Gordeev & Jeremy Jelliffe & Dongin Kim & Sandro Steinbach, 2025. "What matters for agricultural trade? Assessing the role of trade deal provisions using machine learning," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(4), pages 1469-1506, September.
    20. Tatiana de Macedo Nogueira Lima, 2022. "Documento de Trabalho 03/2022 - Aprendizado de máquina e antitruste," Documentos de Trabalho 2022030, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.