IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235511.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hyeyoung
  • Zansler, Marisa
  • House, Lisa A.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate imperfect price reversibility and measure price sensitivity incorporated with the effect of trade promotions for refrigerated 100% OJ. Using a price decomposition method with distributed lags, we test imperfect irreversibility and asymmetric price responses. Empirical models consisted of prices coupled with promotions and prices decoupled from promotions to determine the effect of trade promotions on retail prices. The results showed that the demand for OJ was imperfectly price reversible when we used prices coupled with promotion, and asymmetric price responses were found in NFC OJ demand. Prices coupled with promotions were more elastic than prices decoupled from promotions. The demand for OJ was influenced by both current and previous information. Dynamic adjustments toward price and promotions may result in irreversibility. Competitions with price reduction increase sales in the short run, but frequent promotions may lead to lower reference prices that eventually weaken consumer willingness to purchase at regular prices without promotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hyeyoung & Zansler, Marisa & House, Lisa A., 2016. "The imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235511, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235511
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235511/files/AAEA2016_imperfect%20price.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gately, D., 1992. "The Imperfect Price-Reversibility of World Demand," Working Papers 92-21, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    2. Robert C. Blattberg & Richard Briesch & Edward J. Fox, 1995. "How Promotions Work," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 122-132.
    3. Mayhew, Glenn E & Winer, Russell S, 1992. "An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 62-70, June.
    4. John Crespi & Stéphan Marette, 2002. "Generic Advertising and Product Differentiation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 691-701.
    5. Brown, Mark G., 2008. "Impact of Income on Price and Income Responses in the Differential Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 593-608, August.
    6. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 2009. "Impacts of Flu/Cold Incidences and Retail Orange Juice Promotion on Orange Juice Demand," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 2009. "Impacts of Flu/Cold Incidences and Retail Orange Juice Promotion on Orange Juice Demand," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 338-344, December.
    8. Timothy J. Richards & Miguel I. Gómez & Jun Lee, 2014. "Pass-Through and Consumer Search: An Empirical Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1049-1069.
    9. Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2000. "A Uniform Substitute Demand Model With Varying Coefficients," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.
    10. Dermot Gately & Hiliard G. Huntington, 2002. "The Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Price and Income on Energy and Oil Demand," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 19-55.
    11. Dargay, Joyce & Gately, Dermot, 1995. "The imperfect price reversibility of non-transport oil demand in the OECD," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 59-71, January.
    12. Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jong-Yinq, 2000. "A Uniform Substitute Demand Model with Varying Coefficients," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2007. "Impacts of Promotional Tactics in a Conditional Demand System for Beverages," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 25(2), pages 1-16.
    14. Krishnamurthi, Lakshman & Mazumdar, Tridib & Raj, S P, 1992. "Asymmetric Response to Price in Consumer Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 387-400, December.
    15. Brown, Mark G., 2008. "Impact of Income on Price and Income Responses in the Differential Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyeyoung Kim & Marisa Zansler & Lisa A. House, 2018. "Retail promotion with price cut and the imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 363-376, March.
    2. van Oest, Rutger, 2013. "Why are Consumers Less Loss Averse in Internal than External Reference Prices?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 62-71.
    3. Yuval Arbel & Danny Ben-Shahar & Stuart Gabriel, 2016. "Are The Disabled Less Loss Averse? Evidence From A Natural Policy Experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 1291-1318, April.
    4. Chandrashekaran, Rajesh & Grewal, Dhruv, 2006. "Anchoring effects of advertised reference price and sale price: The moderating role of saving presentation format," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1063-1071, October.
    5. Adofo, Yaw Osei & Evans, Joanne & Hunt, Lester Charles, 2013. "How sensitive to time period sampling is the asymmetric price response specification in energy demand modelling?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 90-109.
    6. Huntington, Hillard G. & Barrios, James J. & Arora, Vipin, 2019. "Review of key international demand elasticities for major industrializing economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Robert Slonim & Ellen Garbarino, 2009. "Similarities and differences between stockpiling and reference effects," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 351-371.
    8. Mao, Zhixin & Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Wenxia, 2023. "Consumers’ choice of private label considering reference price and moderating effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Adeyemi, Olutomi I. & Hunt, Lester C., 2007. "Modelling OECD industrial energy demand: Asymmetric price responses and energy-saving technical change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 693-709, July.
    10. Xin Xu & Jayachandran N Variyam & Zhenxiang Zhao & Frank J Chaloupka, 2014. "Relative Food Prices and Obesity in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: 1976-2001," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Koen Pauwels & Shuba Srinivasan & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "When Do Price Thresholds Matter in Retail Categories?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 83-100, 01-02.
    12. Ajayi, V. & Reiner, D., 2018. "European Industrial Energy Intensity: The Role of Innovation 1995-2009," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1835, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Chou, Hsuan-Yi, 2015. "The effects of promotional frames of sales packages on perceived price increases and repurchase intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 23-33.
    14. Brown, Mark G. & Jauregui, Carlos E., 2011. "Conditional Demand System for Beverages," Research papers 104335, Florida Department of Citrus.
    15. Adeyemi, Olutomi I. & Broadstock, David C. & Chitnis, Mona & Hunt, Lester C. & Judge, Guy, 2010. "Asymmetric price responses and the underlying energy demand trend: Are they substitutes or complements? Evidence from modelling OECD aggregate energy demand," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1157-1164, September.
    16. Kopalle, Praveen K. & Kannan, P.K. & Boldt, Lin Bao & Arora, Neeraj, 2012. "The impact of household level heterogeneity in reference price effects on optimal retailer pricing policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 102-114.
    17. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    18. Mark Brown & Jonq-Ying Lee, 2008. "Impacts of the distribution of households across income groups in a differential demand system for orange juice," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 567-584, June.
    19. Wolk, Agnieszka & Spann, Martin, 2008. "The effects of reference prices on bidding behavior in interactive pricing mechanisms," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 2-18.
    20. Brown, Mark G., 2006. "Impact of Income on Price and Income Responses in the Differential Demand System," Research papers 36836, Florida Department of Citrus.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.