IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/62293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Promotional Tactics in a Conditional Demand System for Beverages

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Mark G.
  • Lee, Jonq-Ying

Abstract

This study examined the impacts of four promotional tactics—features, displays, features and display together, and temporary price reductions—in context of a conditional demand system for 12 beverages. The Rotterdam model with promotion effects specified through the Tintner-Ichimura-Basmann relationship was used in the empirical study. The estimated conditional-demand equations exhibited relatively strong own- and cross-promotional effects, indicating a relatively high level of competition for market share among the beverages studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2007. "Impacts of Promotional Tactics in a Conditional Demand System for Beverages," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 25(2), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:62293
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.62293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/62293/files/JAB_Fall07__03_pp147-162.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.62293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Mark G. & Behr, Robert M. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 1994. "Conditional Demand And Endogeneity? A Case Study Of Demand For Juice Products," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Mark G. & Jauregui, Carlos E., 2011. "Conditional Demand System for Beverages," Research papers 104335, Florida Department of Citrus.
    2. Lin, Biing-Hwan & Smith, Travis A. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2010. "Effects of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverage and Subsidizing Milk: Beverage Consumption, Nutrition, and Obesity among US Children," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116448, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kim, Hyeyoung & Zansler, Marisa & House, Lisa A., 2016. "The imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235511, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Hyeyoung Kim & Marisa Zansler & Lisa A. House, 2018. "Retail promotion with price cut and the imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 363-376, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kira Lancker & Julia Bronnmann, 2022. "Substitution Preferences for Fish in Senegal," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 1015-1045, August.
    2. Leffler, Kristyn K. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Boonsaeng, Tullaya, 2012. "Temporal Aggregation and Treatment of Zero Dependent Variables in the Estimation of Food Demand using Cross-Sectional Data," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124913, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Maynard, Leigh J. & Veeramani, Venkat N., 2003. "Price Sensitivities for U.S. Frozen Dairy Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Brown, Mark G., 2009. "Preference Variable Impacts in Direct and Inverse Differential Demand Systems," Research papers 104331, Florida Department of Citrus.
    5. Okrent, Abigail M. & Alston, Julian M., 2011. "Demand for Food in the United States: A Review of Literature, Evaluation of Previous Estimates, and Presentation of New Estimates of Demand," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 251908, December.
    6. Brown, Mark G. & Jauregui, Carlos E., 2011. "Conditional Demand System for Beverages," Research papers 104335, Florida Department of Citrus.
    7. Andrew Muhammad & S. Aaron Smith & Tun‐Hsiang Edward Yu, 2021. "COVID‐19 and cotton import demand in China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 3-24, January.
    8. Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2000. "A Uniform Substitute Demand Model With Varying Coefficients," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.
    9. Brown, Mark G., 2006. "Impact of Income on Price and Income Responses in the Differential Demand System," Research papers 36836, Florida Department of Citrus.
    10. Gao, Zhifeng & Yu, Xiaohua & Lee, Jonq-Ying, 2013. "Consumer demand for diet quality: evidence from the healthy eating index," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(3).
    11. Xiao, Hui & Kinnucan, Henry W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1998. "Advertising, Structural Change, and U.S. Non-Alcoholic Drink Demand," Research Bulletins 122688, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    12. Mark G. Brown & Jonq-Ying Lee & Thomas H. Spreen, 1996. "The impact of generic advertising and the free rider problem: A look at the US orange juice market and imports," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 309-316.
    13. Mark G. Brown & Jonq-Ying Lee, 2000. "A measurement of the quality of orange-juice consumption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 321-332.
    14. Brown, Mark G., 2008. "Impact of Income on Price and Income Responses in the Differential Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Everett B. Peterson & Ronald W. Cotterill, 1998. "Incorporating Flexible Demand Systems in Empirical Models of Market Power," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 043, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:62293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.