IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/58930.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Wirkung von Innovationsaktivitäten geförderter österreichischer Unternehmen auf die Belegschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Bock-Schappelwein
  • Rainer Eppel

    (WIFO)

  • Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger

    (WIFO)

  • Agnes Kügler
  • Helmut Mahringer

    (WIFO)

  • Fabian Unterlass

    (WIFO)

  • Christine Zulehner

Abstract

Die Analyse möglicher Effekte von geförderten Innovationsaktivitäten für die gesamte Belegschaft eines Unternehmens konzentriert sich auf Faktoren wie Arbeitsplatzsicherheit, Arbeitsplatzstabilität und Arbeitskräfteumschlag, Entlohnung und Belegschaftsstruktur (z. B. Lehrausbildungsaktivitäten) im Unternehmen. Erstmals wird dafür ein Datensatz aus FFG- und Aurelia-Daten bzw. administrativen Daten des Hauptverbandes der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger generiert. Demnach ziehen Innovationsaktivitäten auf Unternehmensebene leichte Veränderungen der Belegschaftsstruktur nach sich. Innovationsgeförderte Unternehmen nehmen tendenziell zusätzliche Arbeitskräfte auf. Dies sind überproportional Männer, Junge und Höherqualifizierte. Die neu eingestellten Arbeitskräfte scheinen das Unternehmen nicht rasch wieder zu verlassen, sondern zumindest mittelfristig zu bleiben.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Rainer Eppel & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Agnes Kügler & Helmut Mahringer & Fabian Unterlass & Christine Zulehner, 2016. "Die Wirkung von Innovationsaktivitäten geförderter österreichischer Unternehmen auf die Belegschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58930.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58930
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/58930
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harrison, Rupert & Jaumandreu, Jordi & Mairesse, Jacques & Peters, Bettina, 2014. "Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 29-43.
    2. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    3. Peneder, Michael, 2010. "Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-334, April.
    4. Philippe, ASKENAZY & Eva, MORENO-GALBIS, 2004. "The impact of technological and organizatioanl changes on labor flows. Evidence on French establishments," Discussion Papers (IRES - Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales) 2004031, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    5. Peters, Bettina, 2004. "Employment Effects of Different Innovation Activities: Microeconometric Evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-73, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Askenazy, Philippe & Moreno-Galbis, Eva, 2007. "Technological and Organizational Changes, and Labor Flows: Evidence on French Establishments," IZA Discussion Papers 2549, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Antonioli, Davide & Manzalini, Rocco & Pini, Paolo, 2011. "Innovation, workers skills and industrial relations: Empirical evidence from firm-level Italian data," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 312-326, May.
    8. Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2014. "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2509-2526, August.
    9. Cheron, Arnaud & Langot, François & Moreno-Galbis, Eva, 2007. "The dynamic of job competition during the ICT revolution," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 0702, CEPREMAP.
    10. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, Elsevier.
    11. Eichhorst, Werner & Buhlmann, Florian, 2015. "Die Zukunft der Arbeit und der Wandel der Arbeitswelt," IZA Standpunkte 77, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Philippe Askenazy & Eva Moreno Galbis, 2007. "The Impact of Technological and Organizational Changes on Labor Flows. Evidence on French Establishments," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 21(2), pages 265-301, June.
    13. Donald B. Rubin, 1977. "Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Francesco Bogliacino, 2014. "Innovation and employment: A firm level analysis with European R&D Scoreboard data," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 15(2), pages 141-154.
    15. Dehio, Jochen & Engel, Dirk & Graskamp, Rainer & Rothgang, Michael, 2005. "Beschäftigungswirkungen von Forschung und Innovation: Forschungsvorhaben im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Arbeit. Projektnummer 20/03. Endbericht," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 69959.
    16. Rammer, Christian & Peters, Bettina, 2010. "Innovationen und Beschäftigung in verschiedenen Konjunkturphasen," ZEW Wachstums- und Konjunkturanalysen, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 8-9.
    17. Falk, Martin, 1999. "Technological innovations and the expected demand for skilled labour at the firm level," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-59, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Stoetzer Matthias-Wolfgang & Ernst Daniel, 2015. "Arbeitsplatzeffekte von Innovationen auf Unternehmensebene: Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Evidenz," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 173-188, June.
    19. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt, 1997. "Endogenous Growth Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011662, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:wfo:wstudy:60794 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2017v:43i:3p:405 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ilse Schulz). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.