IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/58930.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Wirkung von Innovationsaktivitäten geförderter österreichischer Unternehmen auf die Belegschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Bock-Schappelwein
  • Rainer Eppel

    (WIFO)

  • Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger

    (WIFO)

  • Agnes Kügler
  • Helmut Mahringer

    (WIFO)

  • Fabian Unterlass

    (WIFO)

  • Christine Zulehner

Abstract

Die Analyse möglicher Effekte von geförderten Innovationsaktivitäten für die gesamte Belegschaft eines Unternehmens konzentriert sich auf Faktoren wie Arbeitsplatzsicherheit, Arbeitsplatzstabilität und Arbeitskräfteumschlag, Entlohnung und Belegschaftsstruktur (z. B. Lehrausbildungsaktivitäten) im Unternehmen. Erstmals wird dafür ein Datensatz aus FFG- und Aurelia-Daten bzw. administrativen Daten des Hauptverbandes der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger generiert. Demnach ziehen Innovationsaktivitäten auf Unternehmensebene leichte Veränderungen der Belegschaftsstruktur nach sich. Innovationsgeförderte Unternehmen nehmen tendenziell zusätzliche Arbeitskräfte auf. Dies sind überproportional Männer, Junge und Höherqualifizierte. Die neu eingestellten Arbeitskräfte scheinen das Unternehmen nicht rasch wieder zu verlassen, sondern zumindest mittelfristig zu bleiben.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Rainer Eppel & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Agnes Kügler & Helmut Mahringer & Fabian Unterlass & Christine Zulehner, 2016. "Die Wirkung von Innovationsaktivitäten geförderter österreichischer Unternehmen auf die Belegschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58930, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58930
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/58930
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eichhorst, Werner & Buhlmann, Florian, 2015. "Die Zukunft der Arbeit und der Wandel der Arbeitswelt," IZA Standpunkte 77, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Philippe Askenazy & Eva Moreno Galbis, 2007. "The Impact of Technological and Organizational Changes on Labor Flows. Evidence on French Establishments," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 21(2), pages 265-301, June.
    3. Antonioli, Davide & Manzalini, Rocco & Pini, Paolo, 2011. "Innovation, workers skills and industrial relations: Empirical evidence from firm-level Italian data," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 312-326, May.
    4. Donald B. Rubin, 1977. "Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Francesco Bogliacino, 2014. "Innovation and employment: A firm level analysis with European R&D Scoreboard data," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 15(2), pages 141-154.
    6. Harrison, Rupert & Jaumandreu, Jordi & Mairesse, Jacques & Peters, Bettina, 2014. "Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 29-43.
    7. Peneder, Michael, 2010. "Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-334, April.
    8. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    9. Peter Huber & Helmut Mahringer & Marianne Schoeberl & Kristin Smeral, 2004. "Arbeitsplatzreallokation und Arbeitskräftemobilität," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25322.
    10. Dehio, Jochen & Engel, Dirk & Graskamp, Rainer & Rothgang, Michael, 2005. "Beschäftigungswirkungen von Forschung und Innovation: Forschungsvorhaben im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Arbeit. Projektnummer 20/03. Endbericht," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 69959.
    11. Bauer, Thomas K. & Bender, Stefan, 2004. "Technological change, organizational change, and job turnover," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 265-291, June.
    12. Dale T. Mortensen & Christopher A. Pissarides, 1998. "Technological Progress, Job Creation and Job Destruction," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(4), pages 733-753, October.
    13. Chéron, Arnaud & Langot, François & Moreno-Galbis, Eva, 2007. "The “Dynamic” of Job Competition during the ICT Revolution," IZA Discussion Papers 2671, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Rammer, Christian & Peters, Bettina, 2010. "Innovationen und Beschäftigung in verschiedenen Konjunkturphasen," ZEW Wachstums- und Konjunkturanalysen, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 8-9.
    15. Peters, Bettina, 2004. "Employment Effects of Different Innovation Activities: Microeconometric Evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 04-73, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Askenazy, Philippe & Moreno-Galbis, Eva, 2007. "Technological and Organizational Changes, and Labor Flows: Evidence on French Establishments," IZA Discussion Papers 2549, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2014. "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2509-2526, August.
    18. Falk, Martin, 1999. "Technological innovations and the expected demand for skilled labour at the firm level," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-59, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 12, pages 1043-1171, Elsevier.
    20. Stoetzer Matthias-Wolfgang & Ernst Daniel, 2015. "Arbeitsplatzeffekte von Innovationen auf Unternehmensebene: Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Evidenz: Innovative firms and employment – a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 173-188, June.
    21. Crimmann, A. & Evers, K. & Günther, Jutta & Guhr, Katja & Sunder, M., 2010. "Sind Innovatoren erfolgreicher als Nicht-Innovatoren? Eine empirische Analyse für das Verarbeitende Gewerbe in Deutschland," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 16(10), pages 484-490.
    22. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt, 1997. "Endogenous Growth Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011662, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jürgen Janger & Matthias Firgo & Kathrin Hofmann & Agnes Kügler & Anna Strauss-Kollin & Gerhard Streicher & Hans Pechar, 2017. "Wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Effekte von Universitäten," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60794.
    2. Maximilian Unger & Stella Zilian & Wolfgang Polt & Wilfried Altzinger & Timon Scheuer & Karim Bekhtiar, 2017. "Technologischer Fortschritt und Ungleichheit: eine empirische Analyse der Entwicklung in Österreich 2008-2014," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 43(3), pages 405-437.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rammer, Christian & Peters, Bettina, 2010. "Innovationsverhalten der Unternehmen in Deutschland 2008: Aktuelle Entwicklungen – Innovationsperspektiven – Beschäftigungsbeitrag von Innovationen," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Maliranta, Mika, 2013. "Globalization, occupational restructuring and firm performance," ETLA Working Papers 5, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    3. Ugur, Mehmet, 2019. "Innovation, technology adoption and employment: Evidence synthesis," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 28307, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    4. Luigi Aldieri & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Firm Size and Sustainable Innovation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Stephan Brunow & Stefanie Lösch & Ostap Okhrin, 2022. "Labor market tightness and individual wage growth: evidence from Germany," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 56(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Rinaldo Evangelista & Maria Savona, 2010. "Innovation and Employment in Services," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Luc Behaghel & Julie Moschion, 2011. "Skilled labor supply, IT-based technical change and job instability," Working Papers halshs-00646595, HAL.
    8. Aldieri, Luigi & Garofalo, Antonio & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2015. "R&D Spillovers and Employment: A Micro-econometric Analysis," MPRA Paper 67269, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Di Cintio, Marco & Grassi, Emanuele, 2015. "Labour flows and R&D: A quantile regression analysis," MPRA Paper 61714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Petri Böckerman & Mika Maliranta, 2013. "Outsourcing, Occupational Restructuring, and Employee Well-Being: Is There a Silver Lining?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 878-914, October.
    11. Böckerman, Petri & Kauhanen, Antti & Maliranta, Mika, 2012. "ICT and occupation-based measures of organisational change: Firm and employee outcomes," MPRA Paper 43302, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Koomen, Miriam & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2022. "Occupational tasks and wage inequality in West Germany: A decomposition analysis," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Gregory, Terry & Salomons, Anna & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145843, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Luc Behaghel & Eve Caroli & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2012. "Information and communication technologies and skill upgrading: the role of internal vs external labour markets," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 490-517, July.
    15. Aubert-Tarby, Clémence & Escobar, Octavio R. & Rayna, Thierry, 2018. "The impact of technological change on employment: The case of press digitisation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 36-45.
    16. Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "ELS issues in robotics and steps to consider them. Part 1: Robotics and employment. Consequences of robotics and technological change for the structure and level of employment," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 146501.
    17. Bernhard Dachs & Martin Hud & Christian Köhler & Bettina Peters, 2016. "Employment Effects of Innovations over the Business Cycle: Firm-Level Evidence from European Countries," DEM Discussion Paper Series 16-20, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    18. Luc Behaghel & Eve Caroli & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2009. "Do internal labour markets survive in the New Economy? The Case of France," PSE Working Papers halshs-00567682, HAL.
    19. Beckert, Bernd & Buschak, Daniela & Graf, Birgit & Hägele, Martin & Jäger, Angela & Moll, Cornelius & Schmoch, Ulrich & Wydra, Sven, 2016. "Automatisierung und Robotik-Systeme," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    20. Richard Duhautois & Christine Erhel & Mathilde Guergoat-Larivière & Malo Mofakhami & Monika Obersneider & Dominik Postels & José Ignacio Anton & Rafael Muñoz De Bustillo & Fernando Pinto, 2018. "The Employment and Job Quality Effects of Innovation in France, Germany and Spain: Evidence from Firm-Level Data," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02613444, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.