IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/31219.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Volkswirtschaftliche Evaluierung eines nationalen Biomasseaktionsplans für Österreich

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Kletzan

    (WIFO)

  • Kurt Kratena

    (Coordination)

  • Ina Meyer
  • Franz Sinabell
  • Erwin Schmid
  • Bernhard Stürmer

    (University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna)

Abstract

In einem Szenario werden die makroökonomischen Effekte der Einführung eines Biomasseaktionsplans (Steigerung der Beimischung von Biokraftstoffen auf 20% und des Anteils erneuerbarer Energieträger am Gesamtenergieverbrauch auf 45% bis 2020) analysiert. Die wesentlichen primären Effekte dieser Zunahme der Biomassenachfrage auf die österreichische Wirtschaft sind (jeweils gegenüber dem Basisszenario ohne Biomasseaktionsplan) ein Anstieg der Rohstoffkosten und der Strompreise aufgrund der Förderung von Ökostrom aus Biomasse. Dadurch wird die Investitionstätigkeit der Sachgütererzeugung erheblich gedämpft. Die Energieverteuerung schlägt sich auch in höheren Konsumentenpreisen nieder, gleichzeitig wird das verfügbare Einkommen der privaten Haushalte aufgrund der Gegenfinanzierung (Aufkommensneutralität) der Fördermaßnahmen gedrückt. Die Ausweitung der Investitionen der Energiewirtschaft in teure Technologien (Biomasse) bewirkt eine starke Belebung der gesamten Investitionsnachfrage und damit einen geringfügig positiven gesamtwirtschaftlichen Effekt. Weiters nimmt der Verbrauch an fossilen Energieträgern erheblich ab, sodass die CO2-Emissionen deutlich gedämpft werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Kletzan & Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Franz Sinabell & Erwin Schmid & Bernhard Stürmer, 2008. "Volkswirtschaftliche Evaluierung eines nationalen Biomasseaktionsplans für Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31219, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:31219
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/31219
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard E. Howitt, 1995. "Positive Mathematical Programming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(2), pages 329-342.
    2. Isermeyer, Folkhard, 2005. "Ökonomische Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven landwirtschaftlicher Produktion in den nächsten Jahrzehnten," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 02/2005, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. Donna J. Lee & Richard E. Howitt, 1996. "Modeling Regional Agricultural Production and Salinity Control Alternatives for Water Quality Policy Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(1), pages 41-53.
    4. Franz Sinabell, 2005. "Marktspannen und Erzeugeranteil an den Ausgaben für Nahrungsmittel," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25398, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Kletzan & Ina Meyer & Claudia Kettner & Olivia Koland & Thomas Loibnegger & Alexandra Pack & Thomas Trink, 2008. "AMARA – Adequacy of Mitigation and Adaptation Options for a Case Study Region in Austria. The Example of Biomass as Climate Change Response Strategy," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 33220, April.
    2. Matthias Firgo & Oliver Fritz & Peter Mayerhofer & Stefan Schönfelder & Niklas Schraml & Gerhard Streicher & Michaela Friedl-Schafferhans & Trude Hausegger, 2014. "Öko-Jobs in Wien. Bestandsaufnahme und Analyse," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57881, April.
    3. Ina Meyer & Claudia Kettner & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Erwin Schmid & Martin Schönhart & Andreas Gobiet & Olivia Koland & Thomas Loibnegger & Christoph Schmid & Thomas Trink, 2010. "AMARA – Adequacy of Mitigation and Adaptation Options for a Case Study Region in Austria. The Case for Agriculture and Forestry," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 38862, February.
    4. Olivia Koland & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2013. "International Trade of Bio-Energy Products – Economic Potentials for Austria," FIW Research Reports series IV-004, FIW.
    5. Austrian Institute of Economic Research & University of Graz, Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change & Graz University of Technology, Institute for Process and Particle Engineering & KWI Consult, 2009. "Energiestrukturen für 2020. Technisches Basisdokument für die österreichische Energiestrategie," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 36983, April.
    6. Sinabell, F. & Schmid, E., 2009. "Biomass for Energy Use - Exploring Production Potential and the Production Costs for Austria," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franz Sinabell & Erwin Schmid, 2006. "Entwicklungen in der österreichischen Landwirtschaft bis 2013," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 79(2), pages 121-135, February.
    2. Franz Sinabell & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2015. "Austrian Agriculture 2010-2050. Quantitative Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Measures – An Analysis of the Scenarios WEM, WAM and a Sensitivity Analysis of the Scenario WEM," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58400, April.
    3. Schmid, Erwin & Sinabell, Franz, 2006. "Modelling Organic Farming at Sector Level - An Application to the Reformed CAP in Austria," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25300, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Schmid, Erwin & Sinabell, Franz, 2005. "Evaluation Of Decoupling Scenarios in a Rural Development Context: Results for Austria," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 239278, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Franz Sinabell & Erwin Schmid, 2003. "The Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. Consequences for the Austrian Agricultural Sector," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 8(3), pages 84-101, August.
    6. Schmid, Erwin & Sinabell, Franz, 2004. "Multifunctionality of Agriculture: Political Concepts, Analytical Challenges and an Empirical Case Study," Discussion Papers DP-08-2004, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    7. Hofreither, Markus F. & Schmid, Erwin & Sinabell, Franz, 2004. "Phasing Out Of Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Effects Of The Cap 2003 Reform," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20169, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Konyar, Kazim, 2001. "Assessing the role of US agriculture in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and generating additional environmental benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 85-103, July.
    9. Franz Sinabell & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2018. "Austrian Agriculture 2020-2050. Scenarios and Sensitivity Analyses on Land Use, Production, Livestock and Production Systems," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61571, April.
    10. Schmid, Erwin & Sinabell, Franz & Hofreither, Markus F., 2007. "Phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies: Consequences of the 2003 CAP reform," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 596-604, January.
    11. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Britz, Wolfgang & Linda, Arata, "undated". "How Important Are Crop Shares In Managing Risk For Specialized Arable Farms? A Panel Estimation Of A Programming Model For Three European Regions," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244801, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    13. Kooten, G. Cornelis van, 2013. "Modeling Forest Trade in Logs and Lumber: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis," Working Papers 149182, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    14. Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Johansson, Robert C., 2003. "When The !%$? Hits The Land: Implications For Us Agriculture And Environment When Land Application Of Manure Is Constrained," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22002, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Scheierling, Susanne M. & Treguer, David O. & Booker, James F. & Decker, Elisabeth, 2014. "How to assess agricultural water productivity ? looking for water in the agricultural productivity and efficiency literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6982, The World Bank.
    16. Britz, Wolfgang & Kuhn, Arnim, 2011. "Can Hydro-economic River Basis Models Simulate Water Shadow Prices Under Asymmetric Access?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114272, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    18. Masahiko Gemma & Yacov Tsur, 2007. "The Stabilization Value of Groundwater and Conjunctive Water Management under Uncertainty ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 540-548.
    19. Schuck, Eric C. & Green, Gareth P., 2002. "Supply-based water pricing in a conjunctive use system: implications for resource and energy use," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 175-192, June.
    20. Key, Nigel D. & Kaplan, Jonathan D., 2007. "Multiple Environmental Externalities and Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:31219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.