Author
Abstract
This study examines the dynamic relationship between market structure, diversification, and firm performance in India. Our objective is to investigate the possibility that market structure might moderate the diversification-performance relationship. We build a panel vector autoregression model (PVAR) for Indian firms over 7 years from 2012 to 2018, under the Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm. We use the 4-firm concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman Index to measure market structure, entropy measures of diversification to measure conduct, and Tobin’s Q and Return on Asset (ROA) to measure firm performance. Our study is conducted considering diversification at the group level as well as segment-wise diversification at the firm level. Our study shows that the impact of the market concentration on firm performance is linked to the diversification strategy. High market concentration enhances firm performance with related diversification and reduces firm performance with unrelated diversification. Firm performance is positively impacted by its own lagged values. The firm performance also has a strong positive impact on the Herfindahl -Hirschman index (HHI) in the short run and the influence of Tobin’s Q on HHI persists in the long run. We also find that market concentration is positively influenced by total diversification. Except for unrelated diversification which has a negative impact on Tobin’s Q, the other measures of diversification do not impact firm performance. Therefore, our findings suggest that market structure played some role in explaining the diversification-performance relationship in the Indian context. However, when our study is extended to the segment-wise diversification at the firm level for a few industries, we find that concentration enhances performance and unrelated diversification reduces performance, but it is not significant for most models.
Suggested Citation
Zinnia Mitra Bose & Indrani Chakraborty, 2025.
"Diversification-Performance Linkage: Does Market Structure Play a Moderating Role in India?,"
Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 23(2), pages 479-520, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jqecon:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40953-024-00436-4
DOI: 10.1007/s40953-024-00436-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jqecon:v:23:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40953-024-00436-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.