IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i6d10.1007_s10668-021-01766-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-environmental behavior prescribed by top companies of the world

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry A. Ruban

    (K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (the First Cossack University)
    Southern Federal University)

  • Natalia N. Yashalova

    (Cherepovets State University)

Abstract

Pro-environmental behavior allows top companies of the world to improve their environmental responsibility, to minimize their impact on nature and to guide smaller businesses. The content of 82 codes of conduct of the 100 largest companies from the Forbes GLOBAL 2000 ranking is analyzed. Prescriptions for pro-environmental behavior are found in 78% of the codes. These prescriptions are extensive in the only 14 codes. The analyzed codes deal in average with four pro-environmental behavior types. The most common are the prescriptions of environmental responsibility and general nature respect. Some companies state climate-friendly behavior. It is established that company location is somewhat important determinant of the prescribed pro-environmental behavior: The West European companies prescribe pro-environmental behavior better than those East Asian. The findings of the present study indicate on a promising state of the eco-ethics stated by the top companies, although they also indicate on the urgency of certain amendments of the codes of conduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2022. "Pro-environmental behavior prescribed by top companies of the world," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7918-7935, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01766-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01766-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01766-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01766-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Andrea Werner & Simon Webley, 2009. "How UK companies use their codes of ethics – highlights of the 2007 Institute of Business Ethics survey," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 280-297.
    3. Karasmanaki, Evangelia & Tsantopoulos, Georgios, 2019. "Exploring future scientists' awareness about and attitudes towards renewable energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 111-119.
    4. Kathy Babiak & Sylvia Trendafilova, 2011. "CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 11-24, January.
    5. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Public economics as if time matters: Climate change and the dynamics of policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 4-17.
    7. Olivier Boiral, 2009. "Greening the Corporation Through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 221-236, June.
    8. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    9. Sadia Cheema & Bilal Afsar & Farheen Javed, 2020. "Employees' corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: The mediating roles of organizational identification and environmental orientation ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 9-21, January.
    10. Nhat Tan Pham & Tan Vo-Thanh & Muhammad Shahbaz & Toan Luu Duc Huynh & Muhammad Usman, 2020. "Managing environmental challenges: Training as a solution to improve employee green performance," Post-Print hal-02614722, HAL.
    11. Cherniwchan, Jevan, 2012. "Economic growth, industrialization, and the environment," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 442-467.
    12. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Marie‐Christine Brotherton, 2019. "Improving corporate biodiversity management through employee involvement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 688-698, July.
    13. Bartz, Sherry & Kelly, David L., 2008. "Economic growth and the environment: Theory and facts," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 115-149, May.
    14. Hui Zhou & Haitao Yin & Fang Yuan & Feng Wang, 2019. "Social relationships, public media, and pro-environmental behaviors," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 569-588, August.
    15. Margaret Brunton & Gabriel Eweje & Nazim Taskin, 2017. "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 31-48, January.
    16. Reinhard Steurer, 2010. "The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(1), pages 49-72, March.
    17. Sullivan, Jeremiah, 1999. "What are the functions of corporate home pages?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 193-210, July.
    18. Haiying Lin, 2012. "Cross-sector Alliances for Corporate Social Responsibility Partner Heterogeneity Moderates Environmental Strategy Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 219-229, October.
    19. Francesco Testa & Niccolò Todaro & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Marco Frey, 2020. "Embedding corporate sustainability: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of organization citizenship behavior," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1198-1212, May.
    20. Ioanna Zerinou & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Konstantinos Ioannou & Veronika Andrea & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2020. "Energy Saving: Views and Attitudes among Primary School Students and Their Parents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-23, August.
    21. Nordhaus, William D, 1991. "A Sketch of the Economics of the Greenhouse Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 146-150, May.
    22. Carl J. Kock & Juan Santaló & Luis Diestre, 2012. "Corporate Governance and the Environment: What Type of Governance Creates Greener Companies?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 492-514, May.
    23. McCabe, Donald L. & Trevino, Linda Klebe & Butterfield, Kenneth D., 1996. "The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 461-476, October.
    24. Grimm, Veronika & Kretschmer, Sandra & Mehl, Simon, 2020. "Green innovations: The organizational setup of pilot projects and its influence on consumer perceptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    25. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    26. Steensen, Elmer Fly, 2014. "Five types of organizational strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 266-281.
    27. Aikaterini Zerva & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2021. "Multiple criteria analysis of citizens’ information and trust in climate change actions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7706-7727, May.
    28. Michelle Man Suet Law & Peter Hills & Billy Chi Hang Hau, 2017. "Engaging Employees in Sustainable Development – a Case Study of Environmental Education and Awareness Training in Hong Kong," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 84-97, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Pellegrini & Francesco Rizzi & Marco Frey, 2018. "The role of sustainable human resource practices in influencing employee behavior for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1221-1232, December.
    2. Shibing You & Bi Wu & Ping Shen, 2015. "Government factors that influence the relevance between environmental and economic growth," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 228(1), pages 35-45, May.
    3. Muhammad Mubushar & Shahid Rasool & Muhammad Imtiaz Haider & Roberto Cerchione, 2021. "The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on stakeholders' value co‐creation behaviour," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1906-1920, November.
    4. Jin, Wei & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Energy transition without dirty capital stranding," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Bartosz Jóźwik & Antonina-Victoria Gavryshkiv & Kinga Galewska, 2022. "Do Urbanization and Energy Consumption Change the Role in Environmental Degradation in the European Union Countries?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2016. "China's pursuit of environmentally sustainable development: Harnessing the new engine of technological innovation," CCEP Working Papers 1601, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    7. Abrar ul haq, Muhammad, 2018. "A Role of Corporate Governance and Firm’s Environmental Performance: A Moderating Role of Institutional Regulations," MPRA Paper 100047, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    8. Mou Lin & Azura Abdullah Effendi & Qaisar Iqbal, 2022. "The Mechanism Underlying the Sustainable Performance of Transformational Leadership: Organizational Identification as Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova & Vladimir A. Ermolaev, 2021. "Is Environment a Strategic Priority of the Leading Energy Companies? Evidence from Mission Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Azam, Muhammad & Khan, Abdul Qayyum, 2016. "Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 556-567.
    11. Yusuf Opeyemi Akinwale, 2022. "Awareness and Perceptions of University Students in the Business College towards Energy Savings and Renewable Energy Sources in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 470-476, May.
    12. Alberto Ansuategi & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Is Environmental Protection Beneficial for the Environment?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 786-802, August.
    13. Torelli, Riccardo & Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna, 2019. "Greenwashing and Environmental Communication: Effects on Stakeholders’ Perceptions," OSF Preprints 97vxn, Center for Open Science.
    14. Salome Zimmermann, 2019. "Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2018. "Capital Accumulation, Green Paradox, and Stranded Assets: An Endogenous Growth Perspective," Working Papers 2018.33, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Evangelia Karasmanaki & Panagiota Dimopoulou & Zisis Vryzas & Philippos Karipidis & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2021. "Is the Environmental Behavior of Farmers Affecting Their Pesticide Practices? A Case Study from Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Haider Mahmood & Alam Asadov & Muhammad Tanveer & Maham Furqan & Zhang Yu, 2022. "Impact of Oil Price, Economic Growth and Urbanization on CO 2 Emissions in GCC Countries: Asymmetry Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Hang Thu Nguyen & Tra Thi Dan Vu & Hiep Manh Nguyen & Michael Troege, 2022. "Political embeddedness and the adoption of environmental management practices: The mediating effects of institutional pressures," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 965-983, July.
    19. Elbasha, Elamin H. & Roe, Terry L., 1995. "Environment in Three Classes of Endogenous Growth Models," Bulletins 7474, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    20. Faheem Gul Gilal & Zubaida Ashraf & Naeem Gul Gilal & Rukhsana Gul Gilal & Nisar Ahmed Channa, 2019. "Promoting environmental performance through green human resource management practices in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1579-1590, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01766-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.