IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v9y1995i2p241-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System, Society and Dominance Effects in Cross-National Organisational Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Smith

    (Aston Business School, Aston University)

  • Peter Meiksins

    (Cleveland State University, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Current cross-national organisational theory remains tied to stark polarisation between convergence and divergence, universal and relative, frames of analysis. Attempts at synthesis between these forces allow for, but do not always explain, why the organisation of work should be constantly pressured to conform to one particular `best practice'. Our approach examines three sources of external influence on work organisation practices: (i) the economic mode of production; (ii) national legacies and institutional patterns; and (iii) `best practice' or universal modernisation strategies generated and diffused by the `society-in-dominance' within the global economy at a particular period of time. In other words, the influences upon work within a particular country are the result of a three-way interaction of what we call system effects, societal effects and dominance effects. All societies are marked by these three influences, although the order of influence varies historically and between societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Smith & Peter Meiksins, 1995. "System, Society and Dominance Effects in Cross-National Organisational Analysis," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 9(2), pages 241-267, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:9:y:1995:i:2:p:241-267
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709592002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709592002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709592002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenney, Martin & Florida, Richard, 1994. "Japanese maquiladoras: Production organization and global commodity chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 27-44, January.
    2. Ouchi, William, 1981. "Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 82-83.
    3. Martin Kenney & Richard Florida, 1988. "Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labor Process in Japan," Politics & Society, , vol. 16(1), pages 121-158, March.
    4. Wolf D. Reitsperger, 1986. "Japanese Management: Coping With British Industrial Relations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 72-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dodd, Nigel, 2000. "Economic sociology in the UK," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 2(1), pages 3-12.
    2. Schröter, Oliver & Davoine, Eric, 2013. "Unterschiede in der institutionellen Einbettung der Arbeitsbeziehungen und Human Resource Management Praktiken zwischen Deutschland und der Schweiz: eine explorative Untersuchung in Schweizer Tochterg," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 67(4), pages 364-390.
    3. Mohan Pyari Maharjan & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2016. "Human resource management practices at foreign-affiliated companies in least-developed regions: US and Japanese Companies in Nepal," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 137-164, April.
    4. Anthony McDonnell & Jonathan Lavelle & Patrick Gunnigle, 2014. "Human Resource Management in Multinational Enterprises: Evidence From a Late Industrializing Economy," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 361-380, June.
    5. Dirk Akkermans & Anne-Wil Harzing & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2010. "Cultural Accommodation and Language Priming," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 559-583, October.
    6. van Hoorn, Andre, 2016. "How much does job autonomy vary across countries and other extra-organizational contexts?," MPRA Paper 80010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tony Edwards & Paul Edwards & Anthony Ferner & Paul Marginson & Olga Tregaskis, 2010. "Multinational Companies and the Diffusion of Employment Practices from Outside the Country of Origin," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 613-634, October.
    8. Fiona Moore, 2012. "The Diorama," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 619-642, October.
    9. Jonathan Morris & Rick Delbridge & Takahiro Endo, 2018. "The Layering of Meso‐Level Institutional Effects on Employment Systems in Japan," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 603-630, September.
    10. Tony Royle & Luis Ortiz, 2009. "Dominance Effects from Local Competitors: Setting Institutional Parameters for Employment Relations in Multinational Subsidiaries; a Case from the Spanish Supermarket Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 653-675, December.
    11. Tony Edwards & Rocío Sánchez-Mangas & Patrice Jalette & Jonathan Lavelle & Dana Minbaeva, 2016. "Global standardization or national differentiation of HRM practices in multinational companies? A comparison of multinationals in five countries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(8), pages 997-1021, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mulvaney, Dustin & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2014. "Zero-tolerance for genetic pollution: Rice farming, pharm rice, and the risks of coexistence in California," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 125-131.
    2. Hanibuchi, Tomoya & Murata, Yohei & Ichida, Yukinobu & Hirai, Hiroshi & Kawachi, Ichiro & Kondo, Katsunori, 2012. "Place-specific constructs of social capital and their possible associations to health: A Japanese case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 225-232.
    3. Kaja Prystupa, 2017. "The Role of Organizational Culture in KnowledgeManagement in Small Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 151-173.
    4. Sinem AYDOGDU & Baris ASIKGIL, 2011. "The Effect of Transformational Leadership Behavior on Organizational Culture: An Application in Pharmaceutical Industry," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 1(4), pages 65-73.
    5. Caligiuri, Paula & Bonache, Jaime, 2016. "Evolving and enduring challenges in global mobility," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 127-141.
    6. Dengjian Jin, 1995. "Bounded governance within extended order: The Confucian advantage of synergy under generalized constitutional rules," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 263-279, October.
    7. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    8. Kertai-Kiss Ildikó, 2014. "The Fit of National and Organisational Cultures in International Scientific Literature," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2014),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    9. Masaaki Kotabe, 2020. "Japanese management and the climate of the time," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 25-35, February.
    10. Goncalo, Jack A. & Staw, Barry M., 2006. "Individualism-collectivism and group creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 96-109, May.
    11. Eleni ARAVOPOULOU, 2015. "Zmiana Organizacyjna – Przegląd Teorii I Koncepcji," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 19-32.
    12. Satu Teerikangas & Olivier Irrmann, 2016. "Cultural Change Following International Acquisitions: Cohabiting the Tension Between Espoused and Practiced Cultures," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 195-226, April.
    13. Pramodita Sharma & S. Manikutty, 2005. "Strategic Divestments in Family Firms: Role of Family Structure and Community Culture," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(3), pages 293-311, May.
    14. Sargent, John & Matthews, Linda, 2009. "China versus Mexico in the Global EPZ Industry: Maquiladoras, FDI Quality, and Plant Mortality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1069-1082, June.
    15. Rao Indu, 2009. "The Behavioral Equivalence of Organizational Culture," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-07-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    16. Mohan Pyari Maharjan & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2016. "Human resource management practices at foreign-affiliated companies in least-developed regions: US and Japanese Companies in Nepal," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 137-164, April.
    17. Bonus, Holger & Greve, Rolf & Kring, Thorn & Polster, Dirk, 1999. "Der genossenschaftliche Finanzverbund als Strategisches Netzwerk: Neue Wege zur Kleinheit," Arbeitspapiere 16, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    18. Ivo Bayer, Holger Bonus, "undated". "Europäische Identität und symbolische Politik," Working Papers 201161, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    19. Bernard Burnes & Rune By, 2012. "Leadership and Change: The Case for Greater Ethical Clarity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 239-252, June.
    20. Jonas Puck & Markus K. Hödl & Igor Filatotchev & Hans-Georg Wolff & Benjamin Bader, 2016. "Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1075-1105, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:9:y:1995:i:2:p:241-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.