IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A szervezett sokféleség evolúcióelmélet, hálózatelemzés és a posztszocialista átalakulás
[Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analisys, and postsocialist transformation]

Author

Listed:
  • Stark, David
  • Gernot Grabher, -

Abstract

A posztszocialista átmenettel foglalkozó munkák uralkodó irányzata aszerint vizsgálja a kelet-európai szervezeti formákat, hogy mennyiben felelnek meg a már létező kapitalista mintának, illetőleg hol térnek el ettől. A szerzők ezzel szemben arra mutatnak rá, hogy a gazdasági élet szereplői szükség szülte módon értelmezik át és szervezik újjá az erőforrásokat a posztszocialista viszonyok között, s ezzel innovatív jellegű, rekombináns szervezeti formákat alakítanak ki. A szerzők ezekben nem véletlenszerű torzulásokat látnak, hanem az evolúciós lehetőségeik kimutatására törekednek. Kiinduló feltevésük szerint a vállalkozás valóságos egysége nem az elszigetelt egyén, hanem a társadalmi hálózat, mely összekapcsolja a vállalatokat és a bennük tevékenykedő szereplőket. Arra figyelmezetetnek az evolúcióelmélet újabb eredményei alapján, hogy a mindent átfogó privatizáció és piacosítás segítheti ugyan az érintett gazdaságok rövid távú alkalmazkodását, de a szervezeti formák elszegényítéséhez vezethet, s ezzel leronthatja a hosszú távú alkalmazkodóképességet.

Suggested Citation

  • Stark, David & Gernot Grabher, -, 1996. "A szervezett sokféleség evolúcióelmélet, hálózatelemzés és a posztszocialista átalakulás [Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analisys, and postsocialist transformation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 745-769.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=112
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1984. "Micro heterogeneity of firms and the stability of industrial growth," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 5(3-4), pages 249-274.
    2. Allen, P. M. & McGlade, J. M., 1987. "Modelling complex human systems: A fisheries example," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 147-167, June.
    3. Nee, Victor & Young, Frank W, 1991. "Peasant Entrepreneurs in China's "Second Economy": An Institutional Analysis," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(2), pages 293-310, January.
    4. Karla Brom & Mitchell Orenstein, 1994. "The privatised sector in the Czech republic: Government and bank control in a transitional economy," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 893-928.
    5. Dosi, G, 1991. "Some Thoughts on the Promises, Challenges and Dangers of an "Evolutionary Perspective" in Economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 5-7, January.
    6. Bruszt, László & Stark, David, 1996. "Vállalatközi tulajdonosi hálózatok a kelet-európai kapitalizmusban [Inter-enterprise ownership networks in the East European capitalism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 183-203.
    7. Storper, Michael, 1989. "The Transition to Flexible Specialisation in the U.S. Film Industry: External Economies, the Division of Labour, and the Crossing of Industrial Divides," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 273-305, June.
    8. Cohen, Michael D., 1984. "Conflict and Complexity: Goal Diversity and Organizational Search Effectiveness," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 78(2), pages 435-451, June.
    9. Eliasson, G, 1991. "Deregulation, Innovative Entry and Structural Diversity as a," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 49-63, January.
    10. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    11. Richard R. Nelson, 1991. "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 61-74, December.
    12. Boyer, Robert & Orlean, Andre, 1992. "How Do Conventions Evolve?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 165-177, October.
    13. Chan, Steve, 1979. "The Intelligence of Stupidity: Understanding Failures in Strategic Warning," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 171-180, March.
    14. Hamilton, Gary G & Feenstra, Robert C, 1995. "Varieties of Hierarchies and Markets: An Introduction," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 4(1), pages 51-91.
    15. Peter Murrell, 1991. "Can Neoclassical Economics Underpin the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 59-76, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vince, Péter, 2001. "A vállalati beszerzési és értékesítési kapcsolatok rendszere. Egy gépipari felmérés eredményei [The system of corporate procurement and sales. The findings of an engineering survey]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 980-992.
    2. Vedres, Balázs, 2000. "A tulajdonosi hálózatok felbomlása. A rekombináns tulajdonformák szerepe és a hazai nagyvállalatok tulajdonszerkezetének jellemzői a kilencvenes évek végén [The break-up of the ownership networks. ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 680-699.
    3. Lengyel, György & Janky, Béla, 2004. "Vállalati magatartás és túlélési esélyek a posztszocialista átmenetgazdaságban [Corporate behaviour and chances of survival in a post-socialist transitional economy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 699-716.
    4. Szabó, Katalin, 1996. "Barbárok és elitek. Szalai Erzsébet: Az elitek átváltozása. Cserépfalvi Kiadó, 1996," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1038-1043.
    5. Bódis, Lajos, 1997. "Privatizáció, munkaszervezet és bérelosztási mechanizmusok egy nagyüzemi varrodában, I. rész [Privatization, work organization and wage distribution methods. (The example of a sewing workshop in a ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 698-717.
    6. Tóth, István János, 1998. "Vállalkozások tulajdonosi kapcsolatai Magyarországon 19921996 között [Ownership relations of enterprises in Hungary between 19921996]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 591-615.
    7. Gábor R., István, 1997. "Belső versus foglalkozási munkaerőpiac - a posztszocialista átalakulás elhanyagolt dimenziója [Internal counter-employment labour market - a neglected dimension of post-socialist transformation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 457-473.
    8. Kovách, Imre & Csite, András, 1999. "A posztszocialimus vége. A magyarországi nagyvállalatok tulajdonosi szerkezete és hatékonysága 1997-ben [The end of post-socialism. The ownership structure and efficiency of big Hungarian firms in ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 121-144.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eliasson, Gunnar & Johansson, Dan & Taymaz, Erol, 2004. "Simulating the New Economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 289-314, September.
    2. Mulligan, Robert F., 2004. "Fractal analysis of highly volatile markets: an application to technology equities," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 155-179, February.
    3. Henderson, Rebecca., 1994. "The evolution of integrative capability : innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery," Working papers 3711-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2005. "The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 428-456, October.
    5. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    6. Dibiaggio, Ludovic & Nasiriyar, Maryam & Nesta, Lionel, 2014. "Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1582-1593.
    7. Schmidt, Tobias S. & Schneider, Malte & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2012. "Decarbonising the power sector via technological change – differing contributions from heterogeneous firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 466-479.
    8. Atul Nerkar & Srikanth Paruchuri, 2005. "Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 771-785, May.
    9. Rahmeyer Fritz, 2013. "Schumpeter, Marshall, and Neo-Schumpeterian Evolutionary Economics: A Critical Stocktaking," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(1), pages 39-64, February.
    10. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Bart Verspagen, 2017. "The motivations, institutions and organization of university-industry collaborations in the Netherlands," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 379-412, July.
    11. Qunhong Shen & Kaidong Feng & Xiaobin Zhang, 2016. "Divergent technological strategies among leading electric vehicle firms in China: Multiplicity of institutional logics and responses of firms," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 492-504.
    12. Huygens, M.W. & Baden-Fuller, C.W.F. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2001. "Coevolution of Firm Capabilities and Industry Competition," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-61-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Luigi Marengo & Corrado Pasquali, 2012. "How to Get What You Want When You Do Not Know What You Want: A Model of Incentives, Organizational Structure, and Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1298-1310, October.
    14. Krzysztof Szczygielski & Wojciech Grabowski & Richard Woodward, 2013. "External vs Internal Determinants of Firm Technology Strategy:Evidence from the Polish Services Sector," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0454, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Baker, William E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Gattermann Perin, Marcelo, 2022. "Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 863-873.
    16. Kapás, Judit, 1999. "Szükséges-e többdimenziós vállalatelmélet?. Az evolúciós vállalatelmélet kritikai összefoglalása [Is a multi-dimensional theory of the firm necessary?. A critical summary of the evolutionary theory," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 823-841.
    17. Vekstein, Daniel, 1998. "Managing Knowledge and Corporate Performance: an Empirical Analysis of the World Automobile Industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 551-568, October.
    18. Luigi Marengo & Corrado Pasquali, 2010. "How to get what you want when you do not know what you want. A model of incentives, organizational structure and learning," LEM Papers Series 2010/08, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Boyer, Robert, 1998. "Evolution des modèles productifs et hybridation : géographie, histoire et théorie," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9804, CEPREMAP.
    20. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 1998. "Competence and contract in the theory of the firm," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 179-201, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights
    • P31 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.