IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8600-d1155665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Behavior in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Impact of Perceived Interactivity on Behavioral Intention in the Context of Virtual Conferences

Author

Listed:
  • Souha Al-Geitany

    (Department of Business, Girne American University, North Cyprus Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia 99320, Turkey)

  • Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, Centre for Management Research, Girne American University, North Cyprus, Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia 99428, Turkey)

  • Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali

    (Business Management Department, Girne American University, North Cyprus Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia 99320, Turkey)

  • Elsie Nasr

    (Business Management Department, Girne American University, North Cyprus Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia 99320, Turkey)

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of perceived interactivity on behavioral intention in the context of virtual conferences in the post-COVID-19 era. With academic conferences moving exclusively online due to the pandemic, there is a gap in the literature regarding attendees’ attitudes and perceived benefits regarding these events. This study developed the technology acceptance model (TAM) by treating perceived conference interactivity as the antecedent construct of the TAM. The moderating role of self-congruity and the mediating effect of perceived quality were also studied to understand the behavioral intention of attending future virtual conferences. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), a sample of 327 academic staff members in Lebanon was analyzed. Our study found that perceived interactivity and quality both positively influenced behavioral intentions. Additionally, perceived interactivity was positively associated with the perceived quality of virtual conferences, and self-congruity further strengthened this relationship. Our study also revealed that perceived quality mediates the relationship between perceived interactivity and behavioral intention to attend future virtual conferences. This study fills a gap in the literature by examining the impact of perceived interactivity and quality on behavioral intention toward virtual conferences in the post-COVID-19 era. Our findings provide insights into consumer behavior at virtual conferences and can contribute to the development of the TAM via an exploration of its applicability in the context of online events.

Suggested Citation

  • Souha Al-Geitany & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani & Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali & Elsie Nasr, 2023. "Consumer Behavior in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Impact of Perceived Interactivity on Behavioral Intention in the Context of Virtual Conferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8600-:d:1155665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Mazodier & Dwight Merunka, 2012. "Achieving brand loyalty through sponsorship: the role of fit and self-congruity," Post-Print hal-01822308, HAL.
    2. Hahm, Jeeyeon (Jeannie) & Breiter, Deborah & Severt, Kimberly & Wang, Youcheng & Fjelstul, Jill, 2016. "The relationship between sense of community and satisfaction on future intentions to attend an association's annual meeting," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 151-160.
    3. Omar Mubin & Fady Alnajjar & Abdullah Shamail & Suleman Shahid & Simeon Simoff, 2021. "The new norm: Computer Science conferences respond to COVID-19," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1813-1827, February.
    4. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    5. Seren Başaran & Kowther Abdikarin Hussein, 2023. "Determinants of University Students’ Intention to Use Video Conferencing Tools during COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Somalia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Bae, Joonheui, 2022. "Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 797-804.
    7. Sirgy, M. Joseph & Lee, Dong-Jin & Johar, J.S. & Tidwell, John, 2008. "Effect of self-congruity with sponsorship on brand loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 1091-1097, October.
    8. Sirgy, M. Joseph, 1985. "Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 195-206, June.
    9. Milica Jevremović & Nada Staletić & Gheorghe Orzan & Milena P. Ilić & Zorica Jelić & Cristina Teodora Bălăceanu & Oana Valeria Paraschiv, 2022. "Predicting User Behaviour Based on the Level of Interactivity Implemented in Blockchain Technologies in Websites and Used Devices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Chen, Qian & Gong, Yeming & Lu, Yaobin & Tang, Jing, 2022. "Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 552-568.
    11. Manis, Kerry T. & Choi, Danny, 2019. "The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 503-513.
    12. Cho, Heetae & Chi, Christina & Chiu, Weisheng, 2020. "Understanding sustained usage of health and fitness apps: Incorporating the technology acceptance model with the investment model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Camilleri, Adriana Caterina, 2022. "Remote learning via video conferencing technologies: Implications for research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Kamal Basha, Norazlyn & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2022. "Are we so over smartwatches? Or can technology, fashion, and psychographic attributes sustain smartwatch usage?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Parves Sultan & Ho Yin Wong, 2019. "How service quality affects university brand performance, university brand image and behavioural intention: the mediating effects of satisfaction and trust and moderating roles of gender and study mod," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 332-347, May.
    16. Yoo, Weon-Sang & Lee, Yunjung & Park, JungKun, 2010. "The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 89-96.
    17. Mi-Hwa Jang & Eui-Yul Choi, 2022. "How Will Video Conference Fatigue Affect Participants of MICE in the With-COVID-19 Era? Focusing on Video Conference Quality, Social Presence Theory, and Flow," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Benlian, Alexander & Koufaris, M. & Hess, Thomas, 2011. "Service quality in Software-As-A-Service: Developing the SaaS-QUAL measure and examining its role in usage continuance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 58027, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. Martin Thomas Falk & Eva Hagsten, 2021. "When international academic conferences go virtual," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 707-724, January.
    20. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    21. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    22. Junze Wang & Sheng Zhao & Wei Zhang & Richard Evans, 2021. "Why people adopt smart transportation services: an integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 629-646, August.
    23. M. Joseph Sirgy, 2018. "Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: A little history," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 197-207, April.
    24. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    25. Sirgy, M Joseph, 1982. "Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 287-300, December.
    26. Shmueli, Galit & Ray, Soumya & Velasquez Estrada, Juan Manuel & Chatla, Suneel Babu, 2016. "The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4552-4564.
    27. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    28. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Jaeyoung An & Hany Kim & Dongkeun Hur, 2021. "Keeping the Competitive Edge of a Convention and Exhibition Center in MICE Environment: Identification of Event Attributes for Long-Run Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    30. Poonyawat Kusonwattana & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Stefanus Vincent & Jefferson Christofelix & Aryadaksa Amudra & Hazel Juan Montgomery & Michael Nayat Young & Reny Nadlifatin & Satria Fadil Persada, 2022. "Determining Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention to Organize an Online Event during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    31. Sirgy, M. Joseph & Grewal, Dhruv & Mangleburg, Tamara, 2000. "Retail Environment, Self-Congruity, and Retail Patronage: An Integrative Model and a Research Agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 127-138, August.
    32. Mollen, Anne & Wilson, Hugh, 2010. "Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 919-925, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esam Salamah & Ahmad Alzubi & Azmiye Yinal, 2023. "Unveiling the Impact of Digitalization on Supply Chain Performance in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Hang To Diem Tran & Minsook Kim, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Continued Intent to Use Virtual Interactive Platforms in Korean Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises for Remote and Hybrid Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez-Jimenez, Hector & Fastoso, Fernando & Fukukawa, Kyoko, 2019. "How independence and interdependence moderate the self-congruity effect on brand attitude: A study of east and west," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 293-300.
    2. R. J. J. Voorn & G. Veen & T. J. L. Rompay & S. M. Hegner & A. T. H. Pruyn, 2021. "Human values as added value(s) in consumer brand congruence: a comparison with traits and functional requirements," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 48-59, January.
    3. Umesh Raut & Tamas Gyulavari & Erzsabet Malota, 2017. "The Role of Self-Congruity and Other Associative Variables on Consumer Purchase Decision," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    4. Tapas Ranjan Moharana & Debashree Roy & Garima Saxena, 2023. "Brand sponsorship effectiveness: how self-congruity, event attachment, and subjective event knowledge matters to sponsor brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(5), pages 432-448, September.
    5. Zhang, Jing & Chen, Mingliang & Xie, Zhaohan & Zhuang, Jingyi, 2022. "Don't fall into exquisite poverty: The impact of mismatch between consumers and luxury brands on happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 298-309.
    6. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Baker, Thomas L. & Chari, Simos & Daryanto, Ahmad & Dzenkovska, Julija & Ifie, Kemefasu & Lukas, Bryan A. & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2020. "Discount venture brands: Self-congruity and perceived value-for-money?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 412-419.
    8. Lee, Jihyun & Lee, Yuri, 2015. "The interactions of CSR, self-congruity and purchase intention among Chinese consumers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-26.
    9. Basco, Rodrigo & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2022. "Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3).
    10. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    11. Zhu, Xiajing & Teng, Lefa & Foti, Lianne & Yuan, Yige, 2019. "Using self-congruence theory to explain the interaction effects of brand type and celebrity type on consumer attitude formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 301-309.
    12. Fethi Klabi, 2020. "To what extent do conspicuous consumption and status consumption reinforce the effect of self-image congruence on emotional brand attachment? Evidence from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 99-117, June.
    13. Alabed, Amani & Javornik, Ana & Gregory-Smith, Diana, 2022. "AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users' self-congruence and self–AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Belanche, Daniel & Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Marta & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio, 2021. "Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 186-195.
    15. Nicolas G. A. Lorgnier & Nicolas Chanavat & Che-Jen Su & Shawn M. O’Rourke, 2020. "Examining the influence of brand-based value congruity: do the values of the International Olympic Committee really matter?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(1), pages 73-99, March.
    16. Géraldine Michel & Carlos Torelli & Nathalie Fleck & Benoit Hubert, 2022. "Self-brand values congruity and incongruity: Their impacts on self-expansion and consumers’ responses to brands," Post-Print hal-03518525, HAL.
    17. Hector Gonzalez-Jimenez, 2017. "The self-concept life cycle and brand perceptions: An interdisciplinary perspective," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 67-84, June.
    18. Rodrigo, Padmali & Khan, Hina & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2019. "The determinants of foreign product preference amongst elite consumers in an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 139-148.
    19. Mohamed Bouteraa & Brahim Chekima & Nelson Lajuni & Ayesha Anwar, 2023. "Understanding Consumers’ Barriers to Using FinTech Services in the United Arab Emirates: Mixed-Methods Research Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Kressmann, Frank & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Herrmann, Andreas & Huber, Frank & Huber, Stephanie & Lee, Dong-Jin, 2006. "Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 955-964, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8600-:d:1155665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.