IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4601-d791408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Will Video Conference Fatigue Affect Participants of MICE in the With-COVID-19 Era? Focusing on Video Conference Quality, Social Presence Theory, and Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Hwa Jang

    (Department of Industry-University Cooperation, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea)

  • Eui-Yul Choi

    (Department of Marine Sport Sciences, Korea Maritime & Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea)

Abstract

Is our mental health at risk due to spending a significant amount of time online due to the COVID-19 pandemic? In the new era that we are living in, where we live a life that coexists with the virus, we are participating in video conferences held online rather than on-site in order to slow the spread of the virus. Video conferencing has become our necessity since March 2020, and is becoming a new standard, especially in the MICE industry. Recently, however, people who have excessively used video conference platforms are complaining of video conference fatigue, which is a new negative emotion such as stress, anxiety, and worry as well as general work fatigue. Therefore, this study focused on the mechanism of video conferencing in MICE, which is rapidly digitally converted by the virus, and the digital psychological factors of the participants. This study derived the quality attributes of video conferencing in MICE and empirically analyzed the relationship with digital psychological factors of the video conference participants, such as video conference fatigue, social presence, and flow. One hundred and thirty-eight valid questionnaires collected from participants of several international academic conferences held in EXCO, Daegu, Korea, from 23 to 28 May 2021, were analyzed. The main results are as follows. First, unlike general video conference fatigue, MICE video conference fatigue was not found to be related to the preceding and following variables. This is due to the characteristics of the MICE video conference and the expertise of the participants. Second, social presence was identified as an important variable in MICE video conferencing. Although media-mediated, the feeling of being present with the presenter and participants was found to affect the participants’ flow in the video conference. Third, in this study, the fun factor was identified as the most important video conference quality that can enhance the social presence of the video conference participants of MICEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Hwa Jang & Eui-Yul Choi, 2022. "How Will Video Conference Fatigue Affect Participants of MICE in the With-COVID-19 Era? Focusing on Video Conference Quality, Social Presence Theory, and Flow," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4601-:d:791408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman & Yiu-Fai Yung, 2000. "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, May.
    2. Dhir, Amandeep & Kaur, Puneet & Chen, Sufen & Pallesen, Ståle, 2019. "Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 193-202.
    3. Ji-Hee Jung & Jae-Ik Shin, 2021. "Assessment of University Students on Online Remote Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Souha Al-Geitany & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani & Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali & Elsie Nasr, 2023. "Consumer Behavior in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Impact of Perceived Interactivity on Behavioral Intention in the Context of Virtual Conferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Mo & Xiaosan Zhang & Yabin Lin & Zhenghui Yuan & Zengjun Peng, 2023. "Consumers’ Attitudes towards Online Advertising: A Model of Personalization, Informativeness, Privacy Concern and Flow Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Martins, José & Costa, Catarina & Oliveira, Tiago & Gonçalves, Ramiro & Branco, Frederico, 2019. "How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-387.
    3. Jabeen, Fauzia & Tandon, Anushree & Azad, Nasreen & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "The dark side of social media platforms: A situation-organism-behaviour-consequence approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    4. Hufrish Majra & Rajan Saxena & Sumi Jha & Srinath Jagannathan, 2016. "Structuring Technology Applications for Enhanced Customer Experience: Evidence from Indian Air Travellers," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(2), pages 351-374, April.
    5. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Youn Kang & Won Lee, 2015. "Self-customization of online service environments by users and its effect on their continuance intention," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(2), pages 321-342, June.
    7. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    8. Mohammad Shirazian & Imran Khan & Faraz Sadeghvaziri & Elham Ebrahimi, 2024. "Development and validation of a scale for measuring E-retail brand experience," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4157-4180, October.
    9. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    10. Mollen, Anne & Wilson, Hugh, 2010. "Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 919-925, September.
    11. Jinjie Li & Jiayin Qi & Lianren Wu & Nan Shi & Xu Li & Yuxin Zhang & Yinyin Zheng, 2021. "The Continued Use of Social Commerce Platforms and Psychological Anxiety—The Roles of Influencers, Informational Incentives and FoMO," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Esther Calderon-Monge & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2024. "The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 449-491, February.
    13. McDowell, William C. & Wilson, Rachel C. & Kile, Charles Owen, 2016. "An examination of retail website design and conversion rate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4837-4842.
    14. Mutlu Yuksel Avcilar & Akin Alkevli, 2017. "The Antecedents of Mobile Repurchasing Intentions: An Empirical Investigation among Turkish Mobile Shoppers," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 105-105, February.
    15. Juan Pedro Aznar & Josep Maria Sayeras & Jorge Galiana & Alba Rocafort, 2016. "Sustainability Commitment, New Competitors’ Presence, and Hotel Performance: The Hotel Industry in Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Nizar Allouch & Arkadi Predtetchinski, 2008. "On the non-emptiness of the fuzzy core," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 203-210, June.
    17. repec:cmj:networ:y:2013:i:1:p:74-80 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Elisabete Magalhães Serra & Fernando Colmenero-Ferreira & José Manuel Carvalho Vieira, 2007. "Web Consumer Behavior: The Effect Of Enjoyment On Innovativeness," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(1), pages 45-58.
    19. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    20. Parise, Salvatore & Guinan, Patricia J. & Kafka, Ron, 2016. "Solving the crisis of immediacy: How digital technology can transform the customer experience," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 411-420.
    21. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2021. "Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-563.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4601-:d:791408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.