IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1502-d321846.html

Analysis of China’s Manufacturing Industry Carbon Lock-In and Its Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Xia Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Kaifeng 475004, China
    College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Lijun Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Kaifeng 475004, China
    College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Yaochen Qin

    (Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Kaifeng 475004, China
    College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Jingfei Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Kaifeng 475004, China
    College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

Abstract

There are industry lock-in and regional lock-in phenomena in China’s manufacturing industry carbon emissions. However, the existing researches often focus on global carbon emissions, which is not adverse to finding the main problems of manufacturing industry carbon emissions. The biggest contributions of this study are the identification of the industry lock-in and regional lock-in of China’s manufacturing industry and the finding of the regional factors that affect the carbon lock-in of the manufacturing industry, which points out the direction for the low-carbon transformation of the local manufacturing industry. This paper is based on the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) carbon emissions coefficient method and energy consumption data from 2000 to 2016 to count the manufacturing industry carbon emissions of 30 provinces in China (except Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet). On this basis, the paper uses a spatial–temporal geographical weighted regression (GTWR) model to analysis the regional influencing factors of the high-carbon manufacturing industry. Results demonstrate that China’s high-carbon manufacturing industry mainly concentrates on the ferrous metal processing industry, non-metallic mineral manufacturing industry and other sectors. In addition, the carbon emissions of high-carbon manufacturing industries are mainly concentrated in Bohai Bay and the North China Plain. The industrial structure and economic scale are the main reasons for the regional carbon lock-in of the high-carbon manufacturing industry, and the strength of the lock-in has continued to increase. Resource endowment is a stable factor of carbon lock-in in high-carbon regions. Technological progress helps to unlock carbon, while foreign direct investment results in the enhancement of carbon regional lock-in. This study focuses on the regional factors of carbon lock-in in the manufacturing industry, hoping to provide decision support for the green development of China’s manufacturing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia Wang & Lijun Zhang & Yaochen Qin & Jingfei Zhang, 2020. "Analysis of China’s Manufacturing Industry Carbon Lock-In and Its Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1502-:d:321846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Oliveira Junior, Valter B. & Pena, João G. Coelho & Salles, José L. Félix, 2016. "An improved plant-wide multiperiod optimization model of a byproduct gas supply system in the iron and steel-making process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 462-474.
    2. Ning Chang & Michael L. Lahr, 2016. "Changes in China’s production-source CO 2 emissions: insights from structural decomposition analysis and linkage analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 224-242, June.
    3. Boqiang Lin & Kui Liu, 2016. "How Efficient Is China’s Heavy Industry? A Perspective of Input–Output Analysis," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 2546-2564, November.
    4. Unruh, Gregory C., 2002. "Escaping carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 317-325, March.
    5. Diakoulaki, D. & Mandaraka, M., 2007. "Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 636-664, July.
    6. Hammond, G.P. & Norman, J.B., 2012. "Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 220-227.
    7. Yehua Dennis Wei & Wangming Li & Chunbin Wang, 2007. "Restructuring Industrial Districts, Scaling Up Regional Development: A Study of the Wenzhou Model, China," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(4), pages 421-444, October.
    8. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2016. "Reducing CO2 emissions in China's manufacturing industry: Evidence from nonparametric additive regression models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 161-173.
    9. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Guangdong Zuo, 2017. "Volatility Spillovers and Causality of Carbon Emissions, Oil and Coal Spot and Futures for the EU and USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Shumin Jiang & Chen Yang & Jingtao Guo & Zhanwen Ding & Lixin Tian & Jianmei Zhang, 2017. "Uncovering the Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions in an Investment Allocation Model of China’s High-Carbon and Low-Carbon Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Lee, Myunghun & Zhang, Ning, 2012. "Technical efficiency, shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions, and substitutability for energy in the Chinese manufacturing industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1492-1497.
    12. Tao Li & Yimiao Song & Jing Shen, 2019. "Clean Power Dispatching of Coal-Fired Power Generation in China Based on the Production Cleanliness Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    14. Hao Chen & Ling He & Jiachuan Chen & Bo Yuan & Teng Huang & Qi Cui, 2019. "Impacts of Clean Energy Substitution for Polluting Fossil-Fuels in Terminal Energy Consumption on the Economy and Environment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-29, November.
    15. Moreno, Blanca & Pereira da Silva, Patrícia, 2016. "How do Spanish polluting sectors' stock market returns react to European Union allowances prices? A panel data approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 240-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Tianjing & Sun, Yongjun, 2025. "Impact of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility investment: The mediating role of analyst coverage," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Zhao, Congyu & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Wang, Kun, 2023. "How does renewable energy encourage carbon unlocking? A global case for decarbonization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Clara Inés Pardo Martínez, 2009. "Energy efficiency developments in the manufacturing industries of Germany and Colombia, 1998-2005," Serie de Documentos en Economía y Violencia 6144, Centro de Investigaciones en Violencia, Instituciones y Desarrollo Económico (VIDE).
    4. You, Jiansheng & Hu, Jin & Jiang, Bing, 2024. "The correlation evolution and formation mechanism of energy ecological efficiency in China: A spatial network approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    5. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen & Xinyuan Zheng & Peng Liu & Ludan Zhang & Feiyu Chen, 2023. "Asset Structure, Asset Utilization Efficiency, and Carbon Emission Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of China’s Low-Carbon Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Wang, Feipeng & Wong, Wing-Keung & Wang, Zheng & Albasher, Gadah & Alsultan, Nouf & Fatemah, Ambreen, 2023. "Emerging pathways to sustainable economic development: An interdisciplinary exploration of resource efficiency, technological innovation, and ecosystem resilience in resource-rich regions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    7. Congyu Zhao & Kangyin Dong & Xiucheng Dong, 2025. "Is enhanced information and communication technology efficiency a powerful weapon for carbon unlocking? The case of China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(1), pages 599-625, December.
    8. Wang, Pengfei & Li, Hongbo & Huang, Zhenbin, 2023. "The inter-provincial trade inequality in China: An assessment of the impact of changes in built-up land and carbon storage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Hu, Zheng & Xu, Yingzhi, 2025. "Can new energy demonstration cities break through the multiple carbon lock-in? Evidence based on double machine learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Wang, Feng & Wu, Min & Du, Xuyang, 2023. "Does industrial upgrading improve eco-efficiency? Evidence from China's industrial sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Peng Chen & Zaijun Li & Meijuan Hu, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Pattern and Driving Forces of Carbon Lock-In in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Assessing CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry: A nonparametric additive regression approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 325-337.
    2. O’ Mahony, Tadhg & Zhou, Peng & Sweeney, John, 2012. "The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Ireland: A multi-sectoral decomposition from 1990 to 2007," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 256-267.
    3. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    4. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    5. Cheng, Zhaolin & Li, Yanli & Zhao, Laijun & Zeng, Mengjia & Shi, Zhen & Wen, Fashuai, 2025. "Transportation carbon emission structural lock-in and subsidy mechanism design in the “Belt and Road Initiative”," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 424-442.
    6. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi, 2013. "Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 401-429, April.
    7. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    8. Xu, Wenyan & Mo, Wenting, 2024. "Institutional unlocking or technological unlocking? The logic of carbon unlocking in the new energy vehicle industry in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Nill, Jan & Kemp, Ren, 2009. "Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 668-680, May.
    10. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Gürsan, C. & de Gooyert, V., 2021. "The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Foxon, Timothy J. & Pearson, Peter J.G. & Arapostathis, Stathis & Carlsson-Hyslop, Anna & Thornton, Judith, 2013. "Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 146-158.
    13. Bandyopadhyay, Gopal & Bagheri, Fathollah & Mann, Michael, 2007. "Reduction of fossil fuel emissions in the USA: A holistic approach towards policy formulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 950-965, February.
    14. Pablo Del Río, 2010. "Climate Change Policies and New Technologies," Chapters, in: Emilio Cerdá Tena & Xavier Labandeira (ed.), Climate Change Policies, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Liu, Jian & Yang, Qingshan & Ou, Suhua & Liu, Jie, 2022. "Factor decomposition and the decoupling effect of carbon emissions in China's manufacturing high-emission subsectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    16. Fertel, Camille & Bahn, Olivier & Vaillancourt, Kathleen & Waaub, Jean-Philippe, 2013. "Canadian energy and climate policies: A SWOT analysis in search of federal/provincial coherence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1139-1150.
    17. Albert Faber & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 08-15, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Apr 2008.
    18. Tozer, Laura & University, Durham, 2020. "Catalyzing political momentum for the effective implementation of decarbonization for urban buildings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    19. Richard Lohwasser & Reinhard Madlener, 2009. "Impact of CCS on the Economics of Coal-Fired Power Plants: Why Investment Costs Do and Efficiency Doesn’t Matter," FCN Working Papers 7/2009, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    20. John Foster & Liam Wagner, 2014. "International experience with transformations in electricity markets: A Short Literature Review," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 2-2014, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1502-:d:321846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.