IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v90y2024icp154-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate earnings management strategy under environmental regulation: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jintao
  • Su, Taoyong
  • Meng, Li

Abstract

In response to external adverse factors affecting corporate performance, managers may be motivated to engage in earnings manipulation. Environmental regulation as an institutional factor threatens normal earnings for heavy-polluting firms. This paper discusses corporate earnings management strategy under an environmental regulation policy. A multistage difference-in-differences (DID) estimation is performed, based on the central environmental protection inspection (CEPI) that is widely acknowledged as China's most stringent environmental policy. The results show that heavy-polluting firms significantly adjust their earnings management strategy after CEPI. Managers tend to adopt real activities manipulation with the effects of CEPI, while reducing their reliance on accrual-based earnings management. CEPI stimulates heavy-polluting firms to increase environmental investment, which makes their managers more likely to manage earnings through real activity manipulation, simultaneously resulting in the reduction of discretionary accruals. This earnings management strategy only appears in firms inspected in 2016 or non-state-owned enterprises or firms located in the regions with low environmental pressure. Our findings show that managers could use the chances provided by exogenous shocks to manipulate earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jintao & Su, Taoyong & Meng, Li, 2024. "Corporate earnings management strategy under environmental regulation: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 154-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:90:y:2024:i:c:p:154-166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602300446X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:90:y:2024:i:c:p:154-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.