IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v62y2016icp326-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of proposals for practical power sector restructuring and reforms in a dynamic electricity supply industry

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Muhammad T.
  • Thopil, George Alex
  • Lalk, Jorg

Abstract

South Africa׳s electricity supply industry (ESI) remains a vertically-integrated monopoly despite global trends towards restructuring. The monopolistic nature of the ESI could hinder the development of distributed power systems as penetration of renewable electricity increases. The research aims to rationalise South Africa׳s ESI evolution; propose practical power sector restructuring in the short-to-medium term; and to determine their potential impact. The research methodology included a single case study instrument, with embedded sub-units of analysis. Primary research data was gathered using semi-structured interviews with industry experts in addition to which secondary data from government documents and archival records were used for triangulation. Research results conclude that South Africa׳s ESI grew due to techno-economic industrialisation factors, while Apartheid-era policies influenced the ESI in only some specific respects. The vertically-integrated status quo was sustained in the post-transformation period due to government׳s focus on social imperatives; lack of regulatory & policy certainty; and conflicts in political ideology. South Africa did not experience the pre-conditions that triggered global power sector reforms in the late 20th century but these pre-conditions are now becoming evident. Privatisation of Eskom Generation and introduction of wholesale and retail competition are not practical in the short-to-medium term, proving the infeasibility of the standard model of reform locally. The introduction of an Independent System and Market Operator (ISMO) using a single-buyer model is seen as the most favourable and practical option, with the ISMO owning transmission infrastructure. The research suggests that ESI changes will increase system efficiencies, economic performance and private sector involvement, but will not reduce electricity tariffs. The scenarios, challenges and proposals identified in this research are also applicable to other countries in Africa and other developing regions of the world, that have similar social and political backgrounds, ensuring sustainable supply of electricity.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Muhammad T. & Thopil, George Alex & Lalk, Jorg, 2016. "Review of proposals for practical power sector restructuring and reforms in a dynamic electricity supply industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 326-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:326-335
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116300892
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heffron, Raphael J., 2013. "Nuclear new build in the United States 1990–2010: A three state analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(5), pages 876-892.
    2. Verbruggen, Aviel & Vanderstappen, Erwin, 1999. "Electricity sector restructuring in Belgium during the 90's," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 159-171, September.
    3. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2015. "Caught between theory and practice: Government, market, and regulatory failure in electricity sector reforms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 16-24.
    4. Madlener, Reinhard & Stoverink, Simon, 2012. "Power plant investments in the Turkish electricity sector: A real options approach taking into account market liberalization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 124-134.
    5. Perl, Lewis J., 1997. "Regulatory restructuring in the United States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-34, March.
    6. Gaunt, C.T., 2008. "Electricity distribution industry restructuring in South Africa: A case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 3448-3459, September.
    7. Barton, Barry, 1999. "Risk and promise in energy market liberalization: consumer choice in buying electricity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-4), pages 275-288, September.
    8. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Chunyu & Ding, Yi & Xydis, George & Wang, Jianhui & Østergaard, Jacob, 2015. "Review of real-time electricity markets for integrating Distributed Energy Resources and Demand Response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 695-706.
    9. Ahlborg, Helene & Hammar, Linus, 2014. "Drivers and barriers to rural electrification in Tanzania and Mozambique – Grid-extension, off-grid, and renewable energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 117-124.
    10. Matthew Barmack & Edward Kahn & Susan Tierney, 2007. "A cost-benefit assessment of wholesale electricity restructuring and competition in New England," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 151-184, April.
    11. Steyn, Grove, 1995. "Restructuring the South African electricity supply industry : Appropriate governance in a newly democratized South Africa," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 95-108, April.
    12. Roxas, Fernando & Santiago, Andrea, 2010. "Broken dreams: Unmet expectations of investors in the Philippine electricity restructuring and privatization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7269-7277, November.
    13. Polemis, Michael L. & Fafaliou, Irene, 2015. "Electricity regulation and FDIs spillovers in the OECD: A panel data econometric approach," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 110-123.
    14. Kira R. Fabrizio & Nancy L. Rose & Catherine D. Wolfram, 2007. "Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on US Electric Generation Efficiency," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1250-1277, September.
    15. Rabindra, Nepal & Tooraj, Jamasb, 2013. "Caught Between Theory and Practice: Government, Market, and Regulatory Failure in Electricity Sector Reforms," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-22, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    16. Pollitt, Michael, 2008. "The arguments for and against ownership unbundling of energy transmission networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 704-713, February.
    17. Hepbasli, Arif, 2005. "Development and restructuring of Turkey's electricity sector: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 311-343, August.
    18. Jednak, Sandra & Kragulj, Dragana & Bulajic, Milica & Pittman, Russell, 2009. "Electricity reform in Serbia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 125-133, March.
    19. Anupama Sen and Tooraj Jamasb, 2012. "Diversity in Unity: An Empirical Analysis of Electricity Deregulation in Indian States," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    20. Malgas, Isaac & Eberhard, Anton, 2011. "Hybrid power markets in Africa: Generation planning, procurement and contracting challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3191-3198, June.
    21. Tooraj Jamasb and Michael Pollitt, 2005. "Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization & Integration," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 11-42.
    22. Singh, Randhir & Sood, Yog Raj, 2011. "Current status and analysis of renewable promotional policies in Indian restructured power sector--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 657-664, January.
    23. Kulczycka, Joanna & Lipinska, Aleksandra, 2003. "Barriers to liberalisation of the Polish energy-sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-3), pages 229-238, September.
    24. Sung Eun Kim & Joonseok Yang & Johannes Urpelainen, 2016. "Does Power Sector Deregulation Promote or Discourage Renewable Energy Policy? Evidence from the States, 1991–2012," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 33(1), pages 22-50, January.
    25. Ibarra-Yunez, Alejandro, 2015. "Energy reform in Mexico: Imperfect unbundling in the electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 19-27.
    26. Kim, Jihwan & Kim, Yeonbae & Flacher, David, 2012. "R&D investment of electricity-generating firms following industry restructuring," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 103-117.
    27. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "The role of distribution network operators in promoting cost-effective distributed generation: Lessons from the United States of America for Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 484-496.
    28. Severin Borenstein & James Bushnell & Christopher R. Knittel, 1999. "Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 65-88.
    29. Brian Kantor, 1988. "The pricing of electricity in South Africa: A critical assessment of the De Villiers Commission of inquiry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 301-309, December.
    30. Bunn, Derek W. & Martoccia, Maria & Ochoa, Patricia & Kim, Haein & Ahn, Nam-Sung & Yoon, Yong-Beom, 2010. "Vertical integration and market power: A model-based analysis of restructuring in the Korean electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3710-3716, July.
    31. Diaconu, Oana & Oprescu, Gheorghe & Pittman, Russell, 2009. "Electricity reform in Romania," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 114-124, March.
    32. Gratwick, Katharine Nawaal & Eberhard, Anton, 2008. "Demise of the standard model for power sector reform and the emergence of hybrid power markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3948-3960, October.
    33. Pollitt, Michael G., 2012. "Lessons from the history of independent system operators in the energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-48.
    34. Streimikiene, Dalia & Siksnelyte, Indre, 2016. "Sustainability assessment of electricity market models in selected developed world countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 72-82.
    35. Rogge, Karoline S. & Schneider, Malte & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2011. "The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System -- Findings of company case studies in the German power sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 513-523, January.
    36. Sahin, Cem & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Erkmen, Ismet, 2012. "Generation risk assessment in volatile conditions with wind, hydro, and natural gas units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 4-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zaman, Rafia & Brudermann, Thomas, 2018. "Energy governance in the context of energy service security: A qualitative assessment of the electricity system in Bangladesh," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 443-456.
    2. Imam, M. & Jamasb, T. & Llorca, M., 2019. "Political Economy of Reform and Regulation in the Electricity Sector of Sub-Saharan Africa," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1949, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Visser, Henning & Thopil, George Alex & Brent, Alan, 2019. "Life cycle cost profitability of biomass power plants in South Africa within the international context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 9-21.
    4. Xu, Qingyang & Sun, Feihu & Cai, Qiran & Liu, Li-Jing & Zhang, Kun & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2022. "Assessment of the influence of demand-side responses on high-proportion renewable energy system: An evidence of Qinghai, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 945-958.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arina Nikandrova & Jevgenijs Steinbuks, 2017. "Contracting for the second best in dysfunctional electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 41-71, February.
    2. Asantewaa, Adwoa & Jamasb, Tooraj & Llorca, Manuel, 2022. "Reforming Small Electricity Systems: Market Design and Competition," Working Papers 12-2022, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    3. Bensch, Gunther, 2019. "The effects of market-based reforms on access to electricity in developing countries: a systematic review," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 165-188.
    4. Juan C. Percino-Picazo & Armando R. Llamas-Terres & Federico A. Viramontes-Brown, 2021. "Analysis of Restructuring the Mexican Electricity Sector to Operate in a Wholesale Energy Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda R. Timilsina, 2017. "A Quarter Century Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    6. Ibarra-Yunez, Alejandro, 2015. "Energy reform in Mexico: Imperfect unbundling in the electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 19-27.
    7. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda Timilsina & Michael Toman, 2014. "Energy Sector Reform, Economic Efficiency and Poverty Reduction," Discussion Papers Series 529, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    8. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2010. "Electricity Market Reform: Lessons for developing countries," MPRA Paper 27317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Jamasb,Tooraj & Nepal,Rabindra & Timilsina,Govinda R., 2015. "A quarter century effort yet to come of age : a survey of power sector reforms in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7330, The World Bank.
    10. Rabindra, Nepal & Tooraj, Jamasb, 2013. "Caught Between Theory and Practice: Government, Market, and Regulatory Failure in Electricity Sector Reforms," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-22, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    11. Gaffney, F. & Deane, J.P. & Gallachóir, B.P.Ó, 2017. "A 100 year review of electricity policy in Ireland (1916–2015)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 67-79.
    12. Malhotra, Abhishek, 2022. "Trade-offs and synergies in power sector policy mixes: The case of Uttar Pradesh, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2015. "Caught between theory and practice: Government, market, and regulatory failure in electricity sector reforms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 16-24.
    14. Gautier, Axel & Nsabimana, René & Walheer, Barnabé, 2023. "Quality performance gaps and minimal electricity losses in East Africa," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Pollitt, Michael G., 2012. "The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 128-137.
    16. Zaman, Rafia & Brudermann, Thomas, 2018. "Energy governance in the context of energy service security: A qualitative assessment of the electricity system in Bangladesh," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 443-456.
    17. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2013. "Essays on Electricity Market Reforms: A Cross-Country Applied Approach," MPRA Paper 47139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hasan, Mudassar & Arif, Muhammad & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Taghizadeh–Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Time-frequency connectedness between Asian electricity sectors," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 208-224.
    19. Morgan Bazilian & Patrick Nussbaumer & Hans-Holger Rogner & Abeeku Brew-Hammond & Vivien Foster & Shonali Pachauri & Eric Williams & Mark Howells & Philippe Niyongabo & Lawrence Musaba & Brian Ó Galla, 2011. "Energy Access Scenarios to 2030 for the Power Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 2011.68, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    20. Chen, Hao & Cui, Jian & Song, Feng & Jiang, Zhigao, 2022. "Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:326-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.