IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v138y2024ics0264837723004787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing impact: The power of combining land tenure formalization and productive social safety nets programmes in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Msangi, Haji Athumani
  • Ndyetabula, Daniel Wilson
  • Waized, Betty

Abstract

While standard economic theory considers formal property rights as vital for agricultural productivity and economic prosperity, its potential can be limited by absence of important complementary factors necessary for the mechanism to operate. This study sheds some light on complementarities between Land Tenure Formalization (LTF) and Productive Social Safety Nets (PSSN) programmes in Tanzania. Using the Tanzania national panel survey data (2020/21 wave), we employed a doubly robust Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the stand-alone and joint impacts of LTF and PSSN on farm productivity, consumption and food security. We find that joint participation in LTF and PSSN programmes significantly improve farm productivity, households’ consumption and food security. We show that joint impacts of LTF and PSSN are greater than sum of stand-alone impacts suggesting a great complementarity between the programmes. Our cross-tenure analysis suggests a stronger joint impact of statutory LTF with PSSN than that of customary LTF with PSSN, and the true opposite for stand-alone impacts. The study recommends the design of pro-poor productive interventions that incorporate potentially complementary interventions for more optimal outcomes. We suggest for further research on possible interactions between LTF and other anti-poverty interventions for more clarity and sound policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Msangi, Haji Athumani & Ndyetabula, Daniel Wilson & Waized, Betty, 2024. "Maximizing impact: The power of combining land tenure formalization and productive social safety nets programmes in Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004787
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004787
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.